scholarly journals Assessment of TOPKAPI-X Applicability for Flood Events Simulation in Two Small Catchments in Saxony

Hydrology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Firas Al Janabi ◽  
Nurlan Ongdas ◽  
Christian Bernhofer ◽  
Julian David Reyes Silva ◽  
Jakob Benisch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rapid Development ◽  
Soil Layer ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Flood Events ◽  
Small Watersheds ◽  
Physically Based ◽  
Low Performance ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model

Numerical simulations of rainfall-runoff processes are useful tools for understanding hydrological processes and performing impact assessment studies. The advancements in computer technology and data availability have assisted their rapid development and wide use. This project aims to evaluate the applicability of a physically based, fully distributed rainfall-runoff model TOPKAPI-X for the simulation of flood events in two small watersheds of Saxony, Germany. The results indicate that the model was calibrated well for 4.88 km2 Wernersbach catchment (NSE 0.89), whereas 276 km2 Wesenitz catchment calibration was only satisfactory (NSE 0.7). The addition of the second soil layer improved the model’s performance in comparison to the simulations with only one soil layer for Wernersbach (NSE increase from 0.83 to 0.89). During the validation process, the model showed a variable performance. The best performance was achieved for Wernersbach for the year with the highest runoff (NSE 0.95) in the last decade. The lowest performance for the Wernersbach and Wesenitz catchments was 0.64 for both. The reasons for the model’s low performance in some years are discussed, and include: (i) input data quality and data insufficiency, (ii) methods used within the simulations (interpolation, ETP estimation, etc.), and (iii) assumptions made during the calibration (manual calibration, parameter selection, etc.).

scholarly journals Can a Calibration-Free Dynamic Rainfall‒Runoff Model Predict FDCs in Data-Scarce Regions? Comparing the IDW Model with the Dynamic Budyko Model in South India

Hydrology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nag ◽  
Biswal
Keyword(s):  
Model Performance ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Ungauged Basins ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Discharge Data ◽  
Study Region ◽  
Calibration Free ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model ◽  
Free Dynamic

Construction of flow duration curves (FDCs) is a challenge for hydrologists as most streams and rivers worldwide are ungauged. Regionalization methods are commonly followed to solve the problem of discharge data scarcity by transforming hydrological information from gauged basins to ungauged basins. As a consequence, regionalization-based FDC predictions are not very reliable where discharge data are scarce quantitatively and/or qualitatively. In such a scenario, it is perhaps more meaningful to use a calibration-free rainfall‒runoff model that can exploit easily available meteorological information to predict FDCs in ungauged basins. This hypothesis is tested in this study by comparing a well-known regionalization-based model, the inverse distance weighting (IDW) model, with the recently proposed calibration-free dynamic Budyko model (DB) in a region where discharge observations are not only insufficient quantitatively but also show apparent signs of observational errors. The DB model markedly outperformed the IDW model in the study region. Furthermore, the IDW model’s performance sharply declined when we randomly removed discharge gauging stations to test the model in a variety of data availability scenarios. The analysis here also throws some light on how errors in observational datasets and drainage area influence model performance and thus provides a better picture of the relative strengths of the two models. Overall, the results of this study support the notion that a calibration-free rainfall‒runoff model can be chosen to predict FDCs in discharge data-scarce regions. On a philosophical note, our study highlights the importance of process understanding for the development of meaningful hydrological models.

scholarly journals Conceptual Rainfall–Runoff Model Performance with Different Spatial Rainfall Inputs

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1100-1112 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Vaze ◽  
D. A. Post ◽  
F. H. S. Chiew ◽  
J.-M. Perraud ◽  
J. Teng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Model Simulation ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Grid Cell ◽  
Rainfall Series ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Rainfall Time Series ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model

Abstract Different methods have been used to obtain the daily rainfall time series required to drive conceptual rainfall–runoff models, depending on data availability, time constraints, and modeling objectives. This paper investigates the implications of different rainfall inputs on the calibration and simulation of 4 rainfall–runoff models using data from 240 catchments across southeast Australia. The first modeling experiment compares results from using a single lumped daily rainfall series for each catchment obtained from three methods: single rainfall station, Thiessen average, and average of interpolated rainfall surface. The results indicate considerable improvements in the modeled daily runoff and mean annual runoff in the model calibration and model simulation over an independent test period with better spatial representation of rainfall. The second experiment compares modeling using a single lumped daily rainfall series and modeling in all grid cells within a catchment using different rainfall inputs for each grid cell. The results show only marginal improvement in the “distributed” application compared to the single rainfall series, and only in two of the four models for the larger catchments. Where a single lumped catchment-average daily rainfall series is used, care should be taken to obtain a rainfall series that best represents the spatial rainfall distribution across the catchment. However, there is little advantage in driving a conceptual rainfall–runoff model with different rainfall inputs from different parts of the catchment compared to using a single lumped rainfall series, where only estimates of runoff at the catchment outlet is required.

scholarly journals QUASI-PHYSICALLY-BASED DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL INCORPORATING GIS DATA

1992 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 659-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klttlpong JIRAYOOT ◽  
Masaki SAWAMOTO ◽  
SO KAZAMA
Keyword(s):  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Gis Data ◽  
Physically Based ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model

scholarly journals An Automatic Optimization Technique for the Calibration of a Physically Based Hydrological Rainfall-Runoff Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Zohou Pierre Jérôme ◽  
Alamou Adéchina Eric ◽  
Obada Ezéchiel ◽  
Biao Iboukoun Eliézer ◽  
Eugène C. Ezin
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Technique ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Automatic Optimization ◽  
Physically Based ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model

scholarly journals Use of the KINFIL rainfall-runoff model on the Hukava catchment

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (No. 1) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
P. Kovář ◽  
V. Kadlec
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Use Changes ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Flood Events ◽  
Event Duration ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Events ◽  
Small Catchments

The paper reports on the flood events on the forested Hukava catchment. It describes practical implementation of the KINFIL rainfall-runoff model. This model has been used for the reconstruction of the rainfall-runoff events and thus for the calibration of its parameters. The model was subsequently used to simulate the design discharges with an event duration of t<sub>d</sub> = 30, 60, and 300 min in the period of recurrence of 100 years, and during the scenario simulations of the land use change when 40% and 80% of the forest in the catchment had been cleared out and then replaced by permanent grasslands. The implementation of the KINFIL model supported by GIS proved to be a proper method for the flood runoff assessment on small catchments, during which different scenarios of the land use changes were tested.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document