scholarly journals Patient Reported Outcome Measures of Sleep Quality in Fibromyalgia: A COSMIN Systematic Review

Author(s):  
Carolina Climent-Sanz ◽  
Anna Marco-Mitjavila ◽  
Roland Pastells-Peiró ◽  
Fran Valenzuela-Pascual ◽  
Joan Blanco-Blanco ◽  
...  

Poor sleep quality is a common concern and a troublesome symptom among patients suffering from fibromyalgia. The purpose of this review was to identify and describe the available patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of sleep quality validated in adult people diagnosed with fibromyalgia. The COSMIN and PRISMA recommendations were followed. An electronic systematized search in the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO, and ISI Web of Science was carried out. Validation studies of PROMs of sleep quality in fibromyalgia published in English or Spanish were included. The selection of the studies was developed through a peer review process through the online software “COVIDENCE”. The quality of the studies was assessed using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. A total of 5 PROMs were found validated in patients with fibromyalgia: (1) Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), (2) Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS), (3) Sleep Quality Numeric Rating Scale (SQ-NRS), (4) Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS), and (5) Fibromyalgia Sleep Diary (FSD). The quality of the evidence was very good and the quality of the results ranged from moderate to high. All the included PROMs, except for the FSD, showed adequate psychometric properties and, therefore, are valid and reliable tools for assessing sleep quality in the context of FM. However, none of the studies analyzed all the psychometric properties of the included PROMs as established in the COSMIN guidelines, highlighting that this is a potential field of research for future investigations.

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii24-ii24
Author(s):  
K S Bull ◽  
S Stubley ◽  
A Freeman ◽  
C Liossi ◽  
A E Darlington ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Survivors of childhood brain tumours are at risk of poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Appropriate and relevant measures can be used to monitor HRQoL so that timely interventions may be made for issues thus identified. We had previously selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with good psychometric properties that had emerged as well-suited for this use in two systematic reviews. The aim of the present study was to ascertain the views of families regarding the suitability of the selected measures for use in paediatric neuro-oncology follow-up clinics. These views were then used to inform the choice of PROMs for use on the KLIK PROM portal, a website designed to gather HRQoL information from families. MATERIAL AND METHODS As part of the PROMOTE study, we used a multi-centre, multi-informant, cross-sectional, qualitative methods research design. Using ‘think aloud’ audio-recorded interviews, children aged 8–17 years diagnosed within the previous five years with a brain tumour, off treatment and receiving outpatient care, and their parents, were shown a total of nine PROMs and asked to express their views on which they preferred. Detailed notes were made of all audio-recordings by two independent researchers. The final choice of PROMs to be included on the KLIK PROM portal was agreed through discussion of the PROMs selected by families with an expert panel of clinicians, researchers, and parent representatives. RESULTS 16 children and 17 parents participated and of these 2 children and 2 parents did not express a preference. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Core module was the most popular among the children and parents with 7/14 (50%) of children selecting it as either their 1st or 2nd choice citing that they liked the questions and felt them to be most relevant to them, and 8/15 (53%) of parents citing that it was easy, quick and simple, the wording was easy, and they liked the questions about emotional, social, and school functioning. The least popular questionnaires, with no participants selecting them as first choices, were the Kidscreen-10 and the Health Utilities Index. The latter 2 were selected only as 2nd or lower choices by 1 child and 3 parents respectively. CONCLUSION The PROMs that were finally selected for the KLIK PROM portal were the parent- and child-report PedsQL-Core measures of HRQoL due to their good psychometric properties, family and clinician preference and perceived relevance to follow-up care, and for clinical utility on the KLIK PROM portal.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 12-13
Author(s):  
Munira Essat ◽  
Ahmed Aber ◽  
Patrick Phillips ◽  
Edith Poku ◽  
Helen Buckley Wood ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION:Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a way to measure the impact of a disease and its associated treatments on the quality of life from the patients’ perspective. The aim of this review was to identify PROMs that have been developed and/or validated in patients with carotid artery disease (CAD) undergoing revascularization, and to assess their psychometric properties and examine suitability for research and clinical use.METHODS:Eight electronic databases including MEDLINE and CINAHL were searched from inception to May 2015 and updated in the MEDLINE database to February 2017. A two-stage search approach was used to identify studies reporting the development and/or validation of relevant PROMs in patients with CAD undergoing revascularization. Supplementary citation searching and hand-searching reference lists of included studies were also undertaken. The Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) and Oxford criteria were used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies, and the psychometric properties of the PROMs were evaluated using established assessment criteria.RESULTS:Six PROMs, reported in five studies, were identified: 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Euro-QoL-5-Dimension Scale (EQ-5D), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Quality of life for CAD scale by Ivanova 2015 and a disease-specific PROM designed by Stolker 2010. The rigour of the psychometric assessment of the PROMs were variable with most only attempting to assess a single psychometric criterion. No study reported evidence on criterion validity and test-retest reliability. The overall psychometric evaluation of all included PROMs was rated as poor.CONCLUSIONS:This review highlighted a lack of evidence in validated PROMs used for patients undergoing carotid artery revascularization. As a result, the development and validation of a new PROM for this patient population is warranted in order to provide data which can supplement traditional clinical outcomes (stroke >30 days post-procedural, myocardial infarction and death), and capture changes in health status and quality of life in patients to help inform treatment decisions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 264 ◽  
pp. 394-401
Author(s):  
Mary Kate Luddy ◽  
Rachel Vetter ◽  
Jessica Shank ◽  
Whitney Goldner ◽  
Anery Patel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document