scholarly journals Evaluating the Potential Use of Smartphone Apps for Diabetes Self-Management in an Underserved Population: A Qualitative Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (18) ◽  
pp. 9886
Author(s):  
Jenny Luo ◽  
Shelley White-Means
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Smartphone Apps ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Limited Access ◽  
Health Apps ◽  
Underserved Patients ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

Health disparities cause a higher rate of diabetes development in poor and minority groups and also limit the care these people receive. Smartphone applications (apps) may be a low-cost, accessible resource to patients with diabetes who experience barriers to traditional health care. Currently, little is known about using health apps to help underserved patients in the United States. This study aimed to investigate the willingness to use diabetes apps in patients with limited access to primary care providers. Fifteen personal interviews were collected and analyzed according to the interpretative phenomenological analysis framework. The interviews produced three overall themes: (1) Despite having little previous knowledge about health apps, patients were all willing to try at least one diabetes-related app; (2) app functions should be individualized to each patient’s needs for maximum benefit; and (3) barriers to app use were varied but commonly included knowledge and technological challenges and security issues. Underserved patients with diabetes expressed a willingness to try health apps, despite limited experience with the technology. Choosing apps individualized to each patient’s needs, instead of a blanket multifunctional app, would provide the greatest benefit for patient-driven diabetes management. Smartphone apps may be a feasible, low-cost resource for patients with limited access to traditional healthcare.

scholarly journals Feasibility and Acceptability of Using Mobile Health Apps in Underserved Patients with Diabetes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Jieyu Luo ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Mobile Health ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Smartphone Apps ◽  
Health Apps ◽  
Underserved Patients ◽  
Mobile Health Apps ◽  
At Home

Introduction. Diabetes mellitus is a condition with a growing morbidity and mortality burden. An estimated 30 million adults currently live with diabetes, with each individual spending over $9500 annually on medical care. The successful management of diabetes is a lifelong endeavor. This involves balancing a variety of factors including diet, medications, and glucose monitoring. It has been well established that successful control of diabetes depends largely upon patients’ daily lifestyle habits and activities. Not all patients, however, have the resources necessary for effective diabetes management. Health disparities lead to a higher rate of diabetes development in minority and poor populations. Since underserved patients have limited access to traditional healthcare avenues, providers should explore other means, like mobile health (mHealth), to help such patients. The rapid adoption of smartphones within the last decade has allowed an opportunity for patients to use mHealth and smartphone applications (apps) as a low-cost way to get health information and services. mHealth has the potential to address such disparities in access to health care. Little is known about the effectiveness of using apps to help underserved patients with their diabetes management. Assessing these patients’ current self-management practices and their interest in using smartphone apps for their diabetes management is the first step in determining how mHealth may benefit this patient population. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to assess how underserved patients with limited access to primary care physicians handled their diabetes on their own at home, to determine what challenges they faced with their self-management, and to examine their willingness to use diabetes mHealth apps on their smartphones to assist with their diabetes management. Methods. This study employed purposive sampling to select patients for individual interviews. Participant selection occurred at a Memphis hospital located in an area of town with predominately low-income and minority residents, as well as a high prevalence of diabetes. Semi-structured interviews were conducted on-site at the hospital based on McNamara’s interview staging. In all, 15 interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded according to the interpretative phenomenological analysis framework. Results. The data produced 5 topic clusters related to at-home diabetes management, which supported 2 overarching themes, and 7 clusters related to mHealth smartphone app use, which supported 3 overarching themes. The themes related to self-management are as follows: 1. Patients are aware that successful diabetes control requires active engagement on their part but voiced struggles related to balancing limited income and a healthy diet, how to manage fluctuating glucose readings throughout the day, and affording medications; and 2. Lacking a traditional relationship with a primary care doctor, these underserved patients turn to friends and family, written materials, and the internet as health care resources. The themes related to smartphone mHealth are as follows: 1. Despite limited knowledge about health apps and varying phone use patterns, patients were all willing to try at least one diabetes-related app; 2. App functions should be individualized to meet each patient’s needs for maximum benefit; and 3. Barriers to app use were varied but commonly included knowledge and technological challenges and security issues. Conclusion. Interviews from this vulnerable population demonstrated that individuals understood the importance of their own active involvement in controlling their diabetes. Yet, because of limited economic and health care resources, these patients struggle with the implementation of effective lifestyle choices in their daily routine. Furthermore, interviewees expressed interest in trying mobile health apps for diabetes management, despite minimal knowledge about the technology. Responses showed that selecting apps tailored to each individual’s needs, instead of offering one blanket multifunctional app, would provide patients with the greatest benefit. Smartphone apps may be a low-cost health resource that patients without regular access to physicians can use for their at-home diabetes management.

scholarly journals Variation in Diabetes Management: A National Assessment of Primary Care Providers

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-76
Author(s):  
John W. Peabody ◽  
Enrico de Belen ◽  
Jeffrey R. Dahlen ◽  
Maria Czarina Acelajado ◽  
Mary T. Tran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Glycemic Variability ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Poor Glycemic Control ◽  
Simulated Patients ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers

Background:Glucose control is monitored primarily through ordering HbA1c levels, which is problematic in patients with glycemic variability. Herein, we report on the management of these patients by board-certified primary care providers (PCPs) in the United States.Methods:We measured provider practice in a representative sample of 156 PCPs. All providers cared for simulated patients with diabetes presenting with symptoms of glycemic variability. Provider responses were reviewed by trained clinicians against evidence-based care standards and accepted standard of care protocols.Results:Care varied widely—overall quality of care averaged 51.3%±10.6%—with providers performing just over half the evidence-based practices necessary for their cases. More worryingly, provider identified the underlying etiology of the poor glycemic control only 36.3% of the time. HbA1c was routinely ordered in 91.3% of all cases but often (59.5%) inappropriately. Ordering other tests of glycemic control (done in 15% of cases) led to significant increases in identifying the etiology of the hyperglycemia. Correctly modifying their patient’s treatment was more likely to occur if doctors first identified the underlying etiology (65.9% vs 49.0%, P<0.001). We conservatively estimated a US $65/patient/visit in unnecessary testing and US $389 annually in additional care costs when the etiology was missed, translating potentially into millions of dollars of wasteful spending.Conclusion:Despite established evidence that HbA1c misses short-term changes in diabetes, we found PCPs consistently ordered HbA1c, rarely using other available blood tests. However, if the factors leading to poor glycemic control were recognized, PCPs were more likely to correctly alter their patient’s hypoglycemic therapy.

scholarly journals Feasibility and Acceptability of Using Smartphone Apps in Diabetes Self-Management in an Underserved Population: Qualitative Study (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Luo ◽  
Shelley White-Means
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Mobile Health ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Underserved Populations ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Health Apps ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

BACKGROUND The successful management of diabetes is a chronic endeavor. It involves a whole host of factors ranging from a consistent patient-provider relationship to regular physical activity. Not all patients with diabetes, however, have access to the resources needed for effective disease management. Health disparities contribute to a higher frequency of diabetes development in poor and minority populations. Moreover, health care disparities limit the care these patient populations receive. Because underserved populations have little to no access to traditional means of health care, providers must explore other avenues to reach this patient group. Mobile health (mHealth) has grown significantly in the last decade. With the fast-paced adoption of cell phones across all socioeconomic groups, mobile health presents the opportunity to offer patients a low-cost way to receive health information, to communicate with providers, and to self-manage chronic conditions. It has been well established that low-income, minority populations experience several barriers to receiving basic health care including uninsurance, limited transportation, and high out-of-pocket costs. The provision of health care via mobile devices may have the potential to address such health disparities. Little is known about the effectiveness of using mobile health and smartphone applications (apps) in underserved populations to help with diabetes management. Knowledge of these patients’ interest in using mobile apps to augment their home self-management may have use in future implementations. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to examine the perception of and willingness to use diabetes mobile health apps on smartphones in patients with limited access to primary care providers. METHODS This study used purposive sampling to select patients for personal interviews. The study was conducted at a general hospital located in a part of town with predominate minority and low-income residency, as well as the highest diabetes prevalence rates. Semi-structured interviews were conducted according to McNamara’s interview staging. A total of 15 interviews were collected and coded by the researcher according to the interpretative phenomenological analysis framework. An independent committee reviewed all interview transcripts and coding to verify trustworthiness of collection and analysis. RESULTS The data produced 7 clusters related to smartphone app use and mHealth, each highlighting a component of the patient experience, which supported 3 overarching themes. The themes are as follows: despite limited knowledge about health apps and varying phone use patterns, patients were all willing to try at least one diabetes-related app; apps functions should be individualized to meet each patient’s needs for maximum benefit; and barriers to app use were varied but commonly included knowledge and technological challenges and security issues. CONCLUSIONS Personal interviews of this underserved patient population demonstrated an interest in and willingness to try mobile health apps, despite limited knowledge about the technology. Responses indicate that tailoring app choices to individual needs, instead of choosing a multi-functional one-size-fits-all app, would provide the most benefit for at-home diabetes self-management. Smartphone apps may serve as a viable low-cost resource for patients with diabetes who have limited access to traditional health care providers.

scholarly journals 145. Monthly Antibiotic Prescribing Peer Comparison Combined with In-person Education Decreases Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S83-S83
Author(s):  
Shelby J Kolo ◽  
David J Taber ◽  
Ronald G Washburn ◽  
Katherine A Pleasants
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Delivery Mode ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Acute Respiratory Infections ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Provider Education

Abstract Background Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is an important modifiable risk factor for antibiotic resistance. Approximately half of all antibiotics prescribed for acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in the United States may be inappropriate or unnecessary. The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to evaluate the effect of three consecutive interventions on improving antibiotic prescribing for ARIs (i.e., pharyngitis, rhinosinusitis, bronchitis, common cold). Methods This was a pre-post analysis of an antimicrobial stewardship QI initiative to improve antibiotic prescribing for ARIs in six Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care clinics. Three distinct intervention phases occurred. Educational interventions included training on appropriate antibiotic prescribing for ARIs. During the first intervention period (8/2017-1/2019), education was presented virtually to primary care providers on a single occasion. In the second intervention period (2/2019-10/2019), in-person education with peer comparison was presented on a single occasion. In the third intervention period (11/2019-4/2020), education and prescribing feedback with peer comparison was presented once in-person followed by monthly emails of prescribing feedback with peer comparison. January 2016-July 2017 was used as a pre-intervention baseline period. The primary outcome was the antibiotic prescribing rate for all classifications of ARIs. Secondary outcomes included adherence to antibiotic prescribing guidance for pharyngitis and rhinosinusitis. Descriptive statistics and interrupted time series segmented regression were used to analyze the outcomes. Results Monthly antibiotic prescribing peer comparison emails in combination with in-person education was associated with a statistically significant 12.5% reduction in the rate of antibiotic prescribing for ARIs (p=0.0019). When provider education alone was used, the reduction in antibiotic prescribing was nonsignificant. Conclusion Education alone does not significantly reduce antibiotic prescribing for ARIs, regardless of the delivery mode. In contrast, education followed by monthly prescribing feedback with peer comparison was associated with a statistically significant reduction in ARI antibiotic prescribing rates. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Complementary and Integrative Health Knowledge and Practice in Primary Care Settings: A Survey of Primary Care Providers in the Northwestern United States

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 216495612110233
Author(s):  
Malaika R Schwartz ◽  
Allison M Cole ◽  
Gina A Keppel ◽  
Ryan Gilles ◽  
John Holmes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Knowledge ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Integrative Health ◽  
And Training

Background The demand for complementary and integrative health (CIH) is increasing by patients who want to receive more CIH referrals, in-clinic services, and overall care delivery. To promote CIH within the context of primary care, it is critical that providers have sufficient knowledge of CIH, access to CIH-trained providers for referral purposes, and are comfortable either providing services or co-managing patients who favor a CIH approach to their healthcare. Objective The main objective was to gather primary care providers’ perspectives across the northwestern region of the United States on their CIH familiarity and knowledge, clinic barriers and opportunities, and education and training needs. Methods We conducted an online, quantitative survey through an email invitation to all primary care providers (n = 483) at 11 primary care organizations from the WWAMI (Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana and Idaho) region Practice and Research Network (WPRN). The survey questions covered talking about CIH with patients, co-managing care with CIH providers, familiarity with and training in CIH modalities, clinic barriers to CIH integration, and interest in learning more about CIH modalities. Results 218 primary care providers completed the survey (45% response rate). Familiarity with individual CIH methods ranged from 73% (chiropracty) to 8% (curanderismo). Most respondents discussed CIH with their patients (88%), and many thought that their patients could benefit from CIH (41%). The majority (89%) were willing to co-manage a patient with a CIH provider. Approximately one-third of respondents had some expertise in at least one CIH modality. Over 78% were interested in learning more about the safety and efficacy of at least one CIH modality. Conclusion Primary care providers in the Northwestern United States are generally familiar with CIH modalities, are interested in referring and co-managing care with CIH providers, and would like to have more learning opportunities to increase knowledge of CIH.

scholarly journals VitalSign6: A Primary Care First (PCP-First) Model for Universal Screening and Measurement-Based Care for Depression

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhukar Trivedi ◽  
Manish Jha ◽  
Farra Kahalnik ◽  
Ronny Pipes ◽  
Sara Levinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Professionals ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Universal Screening ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Similar Treatment ◽  
Measurement Based Care

Major depressive disorder affects one in five adults in the United States. While practice guidelines recommend universal screening for depression in primary care settings, clinical outcomes suffer in the absence of optimal models to manage those who screen positive for depression. The current practice of employing additional mental health professionals perpetuates the assumption that primary care providers (PCP) cannot effectively manage depression, which is not feasible, due to the added costs and shortage of mental health professionals. We have extended our previous work, which demonstrated similar treatment outcomes for depression in primary care and psychiatric settings, using measurement-based care (MBC) by developing a model, called Primary Care First (PCP-First), that empowers PCPs to effectively manage depression in their patients. This model incorporates health information technology tools, through an electronic health records (EHR) integrated web-application and facilitates the following five components: (1) Screening (2) diagnosis (3) treatment selection (4) treatment implementation and (5) treatment revision. We have implemented this model as part of a quality improvement project, called VitalSign6, and will measure its success using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. In this report, we provide the background and rationale of the PCP-First model and the operationalization of VitalSign6 project.

Dysmenorrhea in the Adolescent

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca H. Evans ◽  
Courtney N. Knill
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Pain ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Primary Dysmenorrhea ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Menstrual Suppression ◽  
Secondary Dysmenorrhea ◽  
Medical Advances

As a common medical issue for adolescents both in the United States and worldwide, dysmenorrhea is a leading cause of visits to primary care providers and gynecologic specialists. The prevalence of dysmenorrhea in women is highest in the adolescent population affecting 20-90% of females in this age group. Primary dysmenorrhea is the most common form of dysmenorrhea and is defined as painful menstruation in the absence of pelvic pathology. Secondary dysmenorrhea is explained by an underlying pathology such as endometriosis or genital tract obstruction. The differential diagnosis of dysmenorrhea includes other etiologies of pelvic pain such as gastrointestinal, genitourinary, or other gynecologic pathologies. Symptoms refractory to first and second line treatments warrant further evaluation and management. As the second most common cause of pelvic pain in adolescents after primary dysmenorrhea, endometriosis may manifest itself differently in adolescents when compared to adults. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDS) are first line medical management for dysmenorrhea. Hormonal agents are second line medical management though are often initiated concomitantly with NSAID therapy. Complex imaging and surgery are reserved for refractory cases of pelvic pain. This document outlines the recommended evaluation and management of adolescents with dysmenorrhea and highlights important medical advances that have contributed to treatment.   This review contains 5 figures, 8 tables, and 34 references. Keywords: dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, endometriosis, menstruation, menses, Premenstrual Syndrome, tranexamic acid, menstrual suppression, menstrual disorders  

scholarly journals A Scoping Review of Trauma-Informed Curricula for Primary Care Providers

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 843-856
Author(s):  
Constance Gundacker ◽  
Tyler W. Barreto ◽  
Julie P. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Traumatic Experiences ◽  
Search Term ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Trauma Informed ◽  
The Impact

Background and Objectives: Traumatic experiences such as abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction have a lifetime prevalence of 62%-75% and can negatively impact health outcomes. However, many primary care providers (PCPs) are inadequately prepared to treat patients with trauma due to a lack of training. Our objective was to identify trauma-informed approach curricula for PCPs, review their effectiveness, and identify gaps. Methods: We systematically identified articles from Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Academic Search Premier, Cochrane, PsycINFO, MedEd Portal, and the STFM Resource Library. Search term headings “trauma-informed care (TIC),” “resilience,” “patient-centered care,” “primary care,” and “education.” Inclusion criteria were PCP, pediatric and adult patients, and training evaluation. Exclusion criteria were outside the United States, non-English articles, non-PCPs, and inpatient settings. We used the TIC pyramid to extract topics. We analyzed evaluation methods using the Kirkpatrick Model. Results: Researchers reviewed 6,825 articles and identified 17 different curricula. Understanding health effects of trauma was the most common topic (94%). Evaluation data revealed overall positive reactions and improved knowledge, attitudes, and confidence. Half (53%) reported Kirkpatrick level 3 behavior change evaluation outcomes with increased trauma screening and communication, but no change in referrals. Only 12% (2/17) evaluated Kirkpatrick level 4 patient satisfaction (significant results) and health outcomes (not significant). Conclusions: Pilot findings from studies in our review show trauma-informed curricula for PCPs reveal positive reactions, an increase in knowledge, screening, communication, and patient satisfaction, but no change in referrals or health outcomes. Further research is needed to examine the impact of trainings on quality of care and health outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document