scholarly journals Arteriogenesis and Therapeutic Angiogenesis—An Update

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (24) ◽  
pp. 13244
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Deindl ◽  
Paul H. A. Quax

Vascular occlusive diseases such myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease of the lower extremities, or stroke still represent a substantial health burden worldwide [...]

Circulation ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 91 (11) ◽  
pp. 2687-2692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M. Isner ◽  
Kenneth Walsh ◽  
James Symes ◽  
Ann Pieczek ◽  
Satoshi Takeshita ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Andrew W. Gardner ◽  
Petar Alaupovic ◽  
Donald E. Parker ◽  
Polly S. Montgomery ◽  
Omar L. Esponda ◽  
...  

Apolipoprotein B is a stronger predictor of myocardial infarction than LDL cholesterol, and it is inversely related to physical activity and modifiable with exercise training. As such, apolipoprotein measures may be of particular relevance for subjects with PAD and claudication. We compared plasma apolipoprotein profiles in 29 subjects with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and intermittent claudication and in 39 control subjects. Furthermore, we compared the plasma apolipoprotein profiles of subjects with PAD either treated (n=17) or untreated (n=12) with statin medications. For the apolipoprotein subparticle analyses, subjects with PAD had higher age-adjusted Lp-B:C (P<0.05) and lower values of Lp-A-I:A-II (P<0.05) than controls. The PAD group taking statins had lower age-adjusted values for apoB (P<0.05), Lp-A-II:B:C:D:E (P<0.05), Lp-B:E + Lp-B:C:E (P<0.05), Lp-B:C (P<0.05), and Lp-A-I (P<0.05) than the untreated PAD group. Subjects with PAD have impaired apolipoprotein profiles than controls, characterized by Lp-B:C and Lp-A-I:A-II. Furthermore, subjects with PAD on statin medications have a more favorable risk profile, particularly noted in multiple apolipoprotein subparticles. The efficacy of statin therapy to improve cardiovascular risk appears more evident in the apolipoprotein sub-particle profile than in the more traditional lipid profile of subjects with PAD and claudication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.govNCT00618670.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi H Shishehbor ◽  
Herbert D Aronow ◽  
John R Bartholomew ◽  
Joshua A Beckman ◽  
James B Froehlich ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey O Ouma ◽  
Rebecca A Jonas ◽  
M Haris U Usman ◽  
Emile R Mohler

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 482-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilak Pasala ◽  
Jennifer Soo Hoo ◽  
Mary Kate Lockhart ◽  
Rehan Waheed ◽  
Prasanna Sengodan ◽  
...  

Antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and vascular death in patients who have symptomatic peripheral artery disease. However, a subset of patients who take aspirin continues to have recurrent cardiovascular events. There are few data on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease who manifest aspirin resistance. Patients with peripheral artery disease on long-term aspirin therapy (≥4 wk) were tested for aspirin responsiveness by means of the VerifyNow Aspirin Assay. The mean follow-up duration was 22.6 ± 8.3 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of vascular interventions (surgical or percutaneous), or of amputation or gangrene caused by vascular disease. Of the 120 patients enrolled in the study, 31 (25.8%) were aspirin-resistant and 89 (74.2%) were aspirin-responsive. The primary endpoint occurred in 10 (32.3%) patients in the aspirin-resistant group and in 13 (14.6%) patients in the aspirin-responsive group (hazard ratio=2.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–5.66; P=0.03). There was no significant difference in the secondary outcome of revascularization or tissue loss. By multivariate analysis, aspirin resistance and history of chronic kidney disease were the only independent predictors of long-term adverse cardiovascular events. Aspirin resistance is highly prevalent in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease and is an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular risk. Whether intervening in these patients with additional antiplatelet therapies would improve outcomes needs to be explored.


Open Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e001004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubina Attar ◽  
Axel Wester ◽  
Sasha Koul ◽  
Svend Eggert ◽  
Pontus Andell

AimTo describe the population of patients with previously diagnosed peripheral artery disease (PAD) experiencing a myocardial infarction (MI) and to investigate 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE: all-cause mortality, reinfarction, stroke and heart failure hospitalisation) following MI.BackgroundMI patients with PAD constitute a high-risk population with adverse cardiac outcomes. Contemporary real-life data regarding the clinical characteristics of this patient population and clinical event rates following MI remain scarce.MethodsThis observational study included all MI patients presenting with ST-elevation MI or non-ST-elevation MI between 01 January 2005 and 31 December 2014 with (n=4213) and without (n=106 763) a concurrent PAD diagnosis, identified in the nationwide Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies registry and the National Patient Registry (PAD prevalence: 3.8%). Cox proportional hazard models were applied to compare the outcome between the two populations.ResultsMI patients with PAD were older and more often burdened with comorbidities, such as diabetes, hypertension and previous MI. After adjustments, PAD was significantly associated with higher rates of MACE (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.44), mortality (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.76), reinfarction (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.66), stroke (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.53), heart failure (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.40) and bleeding (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.47) at 1 year.ConclusionA concurrent PAD diagnosis was independently significantly associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes following MI in a nationwide real-life MI population. The low prevalence of PAD compared with previous studies suggests significant underdiagnosing. Future studies should investigate if PAD screening with ankle–brachial index may increase diagnosing and subsequently lead to improved treatment of polyvascular disease


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document