scholarly journals Diagnostic Benefit of High b-Value Computed Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Patients with Hepatic Metastasis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 5289
Author(s):  
Maxime Ablefoni ◽  
Hans Surup ◽  
Constantin Ehrengut ◽  
Aaron Schindler ◽  
Daniel Seehofer ◽  
...  

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has rapidly become an essential tool for the detection of malignant liver lesions. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of high b-value computed DWI (c-DWI) in comparison to standard DWI in patients with hepatic metastases. In total, 92 patients with histopathologic confirmed primary tumors with hepatic metastasis were retrospectively analyzed by two readers. DWI was obtained with b-values of 50, 400 and 800 or 1000 s/mm2 on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. C-DWI was calculated with a monoexponential model with high b-values of 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000 and 5000 s/mm2. All c-DWI images with high b-values were compared to the acquired DWI sequence at a b-value of 800 or 1000 s/mm2 in terms of volume, lesion detectability and image quality. In the group of a b-value of 800 from a b-value of 2000 s/mm2, hepatic lesion sizes were significantly smaller than on acquired DWI (metastases lesion sizes b = 800 vs. b 2000 s/mm2: mean 25 cm3 (range 10–60 cm3) vs. mean 17.5 cm3 (range 5–35 cm3), p < 0.01). In the second group at a high b-value of 1500 s/mm2, liver metastases were larger than on c-DWI at higher b-values (b = 1500 vs. b 2000 s/mm2, mean 10 cm3 (range 4–24 cm3) vs. mean 9 cm3 (range 5–19 cm3), p < 0.01). In both groups, there was a clear reduction in lesion detectability at b = 2000 s/mm2, with hepatic metastases being less visible compared to c-DWI images at b = 1500 s/mm2 in at least 80% of all patients. Image quality dropped significantly starting from c-DWI at b = 3000 s/mm2. In both groups, almost all high b-values images at b = 4000 s/mm2 and 5000 s/mm2 were not diagnostic due to poor image quality. High c-DWI b-values up to b = 1500 s/mm2 offer comparable detectability for hepatic metastases compared to standard DWI. Higher b-value images over 2000 s/mm2 lead to a noticeable reduction in imaging quality, which could hamper diagnosis.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0247379
Author(s):  
Hye Shin Ahn ◽  
Sung Hun Kim ◽  
Ji Youn Kim ◽  
Chang Suk Park ◽  
Robert Grimm ◽  
...  

Purpose To compare the image quality of acquired diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and computed DWI and evaluate the lesion detectability and likelihood of malignancy in these datasets. Materials and methods This prospective study was approved by our institutional review board. A total of 29 women (mean age, 43.5 years) underwent DWI between August 2018 and April 2019 for 32 breast cancers and 16 benign breast lesions. Three radiologists independently reviewed the acquired DWI with b-values of 1000 and 2000 s/mm2 (A-b1000 and A-b2000) and the computed DWI with a b-value of 2000 s/mm2 (C-b2000). Image quality was scored and compared between the three DWI datasets. Lesion detectability was recorded, and the lesion’s likelihood for malignancy was scored using a five-point scale. Results The A-b1000 images were superior to the A-b2000 and C-b2000 images in chest distinction, fat suppression, and overall image quality. The A-b2000 and C-b2000 images showed comparable scores for all image quality parameters. C-b2000 showed the highest values for lesion detection among all readers, although there was no statistical difference in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy between the DWI datasets. The malignancy scores of the DWI images were not significantly different among the three readers. Conclusions A-b1000 DWI is suitable for breast lesion evaluations, considering its better image quality and comparable diagnostic values compared to that of A-b2000 and C-b2000 images. The additional use of computed high b-value DWI may have the potential to increase the detectability of breast masses.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3451
Author(s):  
Nils C. Nuessle ◽  
Felix Behling ◽  
Ghazaleh Tabatabai ◽  
Salvador Castaneda Vega ◽  
Jens Schittenhelm ◽  
...  

Purpose: To investigate the diagnostic performance of in vivo ADC-based stratification of integrated molecular glioma grades. Materials and methods: Ninety-seven patients with histopathologically confirmed glioma were evaluated retrospectively. All patients underwent pre-interventional MRI-examination including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with implemented b-values of 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 2500 s/mm2. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), Mean Kurtosis (MK), and Mean Diffusivity (MD) maps were generated. The average values were compared among the molecular glioma subgroups of IDH-mutant and IDH-wildtype astrocytoma, and 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma. One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Games-Howell correction compared average ADC, MD, and MK values between molecular glioma groups. A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Two b-value-dependent ADC-based evaluations presented statistically significant differences between the three molecular glioma sub-groups (p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: High-b-value ADC from preoperative DWI may be used to stratify integrated molecular glioma subgroups and save time compared to diffusion kurtosis imaging. Higher b-values of up to 2500 s/mm2 may present an important step towards increasing diagnostic accuracy compared to standard DWI protocol.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxing Qiu ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Zhongxu Bi ◽  
Xiaowei Sun ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To compare integrated slice-specific dynamic shimming (iShim) diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI) DWI in image quality and pathological characterization of rectal cancer. Materials and methods A total of 193 consecutive rectal tumor patients were enrolled for retrospective analysis. Among them, 101 patients underwent iShim-DWI (b = 0, 800, and 1600 s/mm2) and 92 patients underwent SS-EPI-DWI (b = 0, and 1000 s/mm2). Qualitative analyses of both DWI techniques was performed by two independent readers; including adequate fat suppression, the presence of artifacts and image quality. Quantitative analysis was performed by calculating standard deviation (SD) of the gluteus maximus, signal intensity (SI) of lesion and residual normal rectal wall, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (generated by b values of 0, 800 and 1600 s/mm2 for iShim-DWI, and by b values of 0 and 1000 s/mm2 for SS-EPI-DWI) and image quality parameters, such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of primary rectal tumor. For the primary rectal cancer, two pathological groups were divided according to pathological results: Group 1 (well-differentiated) and Group 2 (poorly differentiated). Statistical analyses were performed with p < 0.05 as significant difference. Results Compared with SS-EPI-DWI, significantly higher scores of image quality were obtained in iShim-DWI cases (P < 0.001). The SDbackground was significantly reduced on b = 1600 s/mm2 images and ADC maps of iShim-DWI. Both SNR and CNR of b = 800 s/mm2 and b = 1600 s/mm2 images in iShim-DWI were higher than those of b = 1000 s/mm2 images in SS-EPI-DWI. In primary rectal cancer of iShim-DWI cohort, SIlesion was significantly higher than SIrectum in both b = 800 and 1600 s/mm2 images. ADC values were significantly lower in Group 2 (0.732 ± 0.08) × 10− 3 mm2/s) than those in Group 1 ((0.912 ± 0.21) × 10− 3 mm2/s). ROC analyses showed significance of ADC values and SIlesion between the two groups. Conclusion iShim-DWI with b values of 0, 800 and 1600 s/mm2 is a promising technique of high image quality in rectal tumor imaging, and has potential ability to differentiate rectal cancer from normal wall and predicting pathological characterization.


2012 ◽  
Vol 201 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Sebastian Baumann ◽  
Leila Cammoun ◽  
Philippe Conus ◽  
Kim Quang Do ◽  
Pierre Marquet ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Ohlmeyer ◽  
Frederik Bernd Laun ◽  
Sebastian Bickelhaupt ◽  
Theresa Palm ◽  
Rolf Janka ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document