Different Stratification of Physiological Factors Affecting Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury after Cardiac Arrest According to Visible or Non-Visible Primary Brain Injury: A Retrospective Observational Study

We aimed to explore the stratification of physiological factors affecting cerebral perfusion pressure, including arterial oxygen tension, arterial carbon dioxide tension, mean arterial pressure, intracranial pressure (ICP), and blood-brain barrier (BBB) status, with respect to primary or secondary brain injury (PBI or SBI) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Among the retrospectively enrolled 97 comatose OHCA survivors undergoing post-cardiac arrest (PCA) care, 46 (47.4%) with already established PBI (high signal intensity (HSI) on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) had higher ICP (p = 0.02) and poorer BBB status (p < 0.01) than the non-HSI group. On subgroup analysis within the non-HSI group to exclude the confounding effect of already established PBI, 40 (78.4%) patients with good neurological outcomes had lower ICP at 24 h (11.0 vs. 16.0 mmHg, p < 0.01) and more stable BBB status (p = 0.17 in pairwise comparison) compared to those with poor neurological outcomes, despite the non-significant differences in other physiological factors. OHCA survivors with HSI on DWI showed significantly higher ICP and poorer BBB status at baseline before PCA care than those without HSI. Despite the negative DWI findings before PCA care, OHCA survivors have a cerebral penumbra at risk for potentially leading the poor neurological outcome from unsuppressed SBI, which may be associated with increased ICP and BBB permeability.

Download Full-text

Abstract 369: Noninvasive Cerebral Perfusion Pressure and Neurologic Outcome in Post-cardiac Arrest Patients with Targeted Temperature Management

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.142.suppl_4.369 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 142 (Suppl_4) ◽

Author(s):

Minjung K Chae ◽

Sung Eun Lee ◽

Sumin Cho ◽

Taeyoung Kim ◽

Dukyong Yoon

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Brain Injury ◽

Flow Velocity ◽

Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽

Transcranial Doppler ◽

Cerebral Perfusion ◽

Perfusion Pressure ◽

Neurologic Outcome ◽

Temperature Management ◽

Cerebral Monitoring

Introduction: Hypoxic ischemic brain injury (HIBI) is the leading cause of mortality and long-term neurologic disability in survivors of cardiac arrest. Recently, the role of cerebral monitoring is emphasized for individualizing therapy and mitigating secondary brain injury in HIBI patients after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The first step of cerebral monitoring is checking the driving force by cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). However, as CPP is calculated by mean arterial pressure (MAP) minus intracranial pressure (ICP), the process of obtaining ICP is invasive. Noninvasive CPP can be estimated by parameters obtained from transcranial doppler (TCD). Therefore, we aimed to investigate non-invasively measured CPP from TCD and its association with neurologic outcome in post cardiac arrest patients that underwent targeted temperature management (TTM). Methods: This retrospective single-center study included patients who had been treated with TTM following cardiac arrest and who underwent TCD evaluation between July 2017 and July 2019. We aimed to perform TCD evaluation within 48h of ROSC, but sometimes this could not be achieved due to limited resources. Patients with TCD that was performed after 72 hours were excluded. The MFV was calculated using the peak systolic flow velocity (PSV) and the end-diastolic flow velocity (EDV) as below. Two methods of estimating CPP non-invasively was calculated as below.MFV = PSV+(EDVх2) / 3 eCPP_A= MAP*diastolic FVmca/MFVmca + 14eCPP_B= MFVmca*(MAP-DBP)/FVmean-FVdia Results: Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study population Data are presented as mean (standard deviation), number (%) or median (interquartile range).OHCA, out of hospital cardiac arrest; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; AED, automated external defibrillator; TCD, transcranial doppler; CPP, cerebral perfusion pressure. Table 2. Cut off values and diagnostic values in predicting poor neurologic outcome with 100% specificityCPP, cerebral perfusion pressure. Conclusion: eCPP cut off values of <50 mmHg and <60mmHg predicted poor neurological outcome with high specificity. This study suggests that eCPP obtained from TCD may be feasible to predict neurologic outcome.

Download Full-text

Cerebral Perfusion Pressure and Intracranial Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury

Annual Review of Nursing Research ◽

10.1891/0739-6686.33.111 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 33 (1) ◽

pp. 111-183 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Pamela H. Mitchell ◽

Catherine Kirkness ◽

Patricia A. Blissitt

Keyword(s):

Traumatic Brain Injury ◽

Brain Injury ◽

Intracranial Pressure ◽

Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽

Nursing Care ◽

Cerebral Perfusion ◽

Perfusion Pressure ◽

Secondary Brain Injury ◽

Nursing Research ◽

Arterial Blood

Nearly 300,000 children and adults are hospitalized annually with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and monitored for many vital signs, including intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). Nurses use these monitored values to infer the risk of secondary brain injury. The purpose of this chapter is to review nursing research on the monitoring of ICP and CPP in TBI. In this context, nursing research is defined as the research conducted by nurse investigators or research about the variables ICP and CPP that pertains to the nursing care of the TBI patient, adult or child. A modified systematic review of the literature indicated that, except for sharp head rotation and prone positioning, there are no body positions or nursing activities that uniformly or nearly uniformly result in clinically relevant ICP increase or decrease. In the smaller number of studies in which CPP is also measured, there are few changes in CPP since arterial blood pressure generally increases along with ICP. Considerable individual variation occurs in controlled studies, suggesting that clinicians need to pay close attention to the cerebrodynamic responses of each patient to any care maneuver. We recommend that future research regarding nursing care and ICP/CPP in TBI patients needs to have a more integrated approach, examining comprehensive care in relation to short- and long-term outcomes and incorporating multimodality monitoring. Intervention trials of care aspects within nursing control, such as the reduction of environmental noise, early mobilization, and reduction of complications of immobility, are all sorely needed.

Download Full-text

Is there an upper limit of intracranial pressure in patients with severe head injury if cerebral perfusion pressure is maintained?

Neurosurgical FOCUS ◽

10.3171/foc.2003.15.6.2 ◽

2003 ◽

Vol 15 (6) ◽

pp. 1-7 ◽

Cited By ~ 38

Author(s):

Jeffrey S. Young ◽

Osbert Blow ◽

Florence Turrentine ◽

Jeffrey A. Claridge ◽

Andrew Schulman

Keyword(s):

Head Injury ◽

Intracranial Pressure ◽

Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽

Cerebral Perfusion ◽

Severe Head Injury ◽

Perfusion Pressure ◽

Secondary Brain Injury ◽

Traumatic Head Injury ◽

Neurological Outcomes ◽

Physical Examinations

Authors of recent studies have championed the importance of maintaining cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) to prevent secondary brain injury following traumatic head injury. Data from these studies have provided little information regarding outcome following severe head injury in patients with an intracranial pressure (ICP) greater than 40 mm Hg, however, in July 1997 the authors instituted a protocol for the management of severe head injury in patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score lower than 9. The protocol was focused on resuscitation from acidosis, maintenance of a CPP greater than 60 mm Hg through whatever means necessary as well as elevation of the head of the bed, mannitol infusion, and ventriculostomy with cerebrospinal fluid drainage for control of ICP. Since the institution of this protocol, nine patients had a sustained ICP greater than 40 mm Hg for 2 or more hours, and five of these had an ICP greater than 75 mm Hg on insertion of the ICP monitor and later experienced herniation and expired within 24 hours. Because of the severe nature of the injuries demonstrated on computerized tomography scans and their physical examinations, these patients were not aggressively treated under this protocol. The authors vigorously attempted to maintain a CPP greater than 60 mm Hg with intensive fluid resuscitation and the administration of pressor agents in the four remaining patients who had developed an ICP higher than 40 mm Hg after placement of the ICP monitor. Two patients had an episodic ICP greater than 40 mm Hg for more than 36 hours, the third patient had an episodic ICP greater than of 50 mm Hg for more than 36 hours, and the fourth patient had an episodic ICP greater than 50 mm Hg for more than 48 hours. On discharge, all four patients were able to perform normal activities of daily living with minimal assistance and experience ongoing improvement. Data from this preliminary study indicate that intense, aggressive management of CPP can lead to good neurological outcomes despite extremely high ICP. Aggressive CPP therapy should be performed and maintained even though apparently lethal ICP levels may be present. Further study is needed to support these encouraging results.

Download Full-text