scholarly journals Laser Fiber Displacement Velocity during Tm-Fiber and Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripsy: Introducing the Concept of Optimal Displacement Velocity

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 181
Author(s):  
Frederic Panthier ◽  
Thibault Germain ◽  
Cyril Gorny ◽  
Laurent Berthe ◽  
Steeve Doizi ◽  
...  

Background: Endocorporeal laser lithotripsy (EL) during flexible ureteroscopy (URS-f) often uses “dusting” settings with “painting” technique. The displacement velocity of the laser fiber (LF) at the stone surface remains unknown and could improve EL’s ablation rates. This in vitro study aimed to define the optimal displacement velocity (ODV) for both holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) and thulium fiber laser (Tm-Fiber). Methods: A 50W-TFL (IRE Polus®, Russia) and a 30W-MH1-Ho:YAG laser (Rocamed®), were used with 272µm-Core-Diameter LF (Sureflex, Boston Scientific©), comparing three TFL modes, “fine dusting” (FD:0.05–0.15 J/100–600 Hz); “dusting” (D:0.5 J/30–60 Hz); “fragmentation” (Fr:1 J/15–30 Hz) and two Ho:YAG modes (D:0.5 J/20 Hz, Fr:1 J/15 Hz). An experimental setup consisting of immerged cubes of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stone phantoms (Begostone Plus, Begoã) was used with a 2 seconds’ laser operation time. LF were in contact with the stones, static or with a displacement of 5, 10 or 20 mm. Experiments were repeated four times. Stones were dried and µ-scanned. Ablation volumes (mm3) were measured by 3D-segmentation. Results: ODV was higher in dusting compared to fragmentation mode during Ho:YAG lithotripsy (10 mm/sec vs. 5 mm/sec, respectively). With Tm-Fiber, dusting and fragmentation OVDs were similar (5 mm/sec). Tm-Fiber ODV was lower than Ho:YAGs in dusting settings (5 mm/s vs. 10 mm/sec, respectively). Without LF displacement, ablation volumes were at least two-fold higher with Tm-Fiber compared to Ho:YAG. Despite the LF-DV, we report a 1.5 to 5-fold higher ablation volume with Tm-Fiber compared to Ho:YAG. Conclusions: In dusting mode, the ODVTm-Fiber is lower compared to ODVHo:YAG, translating to a potential easier Tm-Fiber utilization for “painting” dusting technique. The ODV determinants remain unknown. Dynamic ablation volumes are higher to static ones, regardless of the laser source, settings or LF displacement velocity.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 2945-2953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Panthier ◽  
Eugenio Ventimiglia ◽  
Laurent Berthe ◽  
Catherine Chaussain ◽  
Michel Daudon ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 3261-3266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Taratkin ◽  
Ekaterina Laukhtina ◽  
Nirmish Singla ◽  
Vasily Kozlov ◽  
Abdusalam Abdusalamov ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mark Taratkin ◽  
Ekaterina Laukhtina ◽  
Nirmish Singla ◽  
Alexander Tarasov ◽  
Tatyana Alekseeva ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Jian J. Zhang ◽  
Jonathan Rutherford ◽  
Metasebya Solomon ◽  
Brian Cheng ◽  
Jason R. Xuan ◽  
...  

Objectives.Although laser lithotripsy is now the preferred treatment option for urolithiasis due to shorter operation time and a better stone-free rate, the optimal laser settings for URS (ureteroscopic lithotripsy) for less operation time remain unclear. The aim of this study was to look for quantitative responses of calculus ablation and retropulsion by performing operator-independent experiments to determine the best fit versus the pulse energy, pulse width, and the number of pulses.Methods.A lab-built Ho:YAG laser was used as the laser pulse source, with a pulse energy from 0.2 J up to 3.0 J and a pulse width of 150 μs up to 1000 μs. The retropulsion was monitored using a high-speed camera, and the laser-induced craters were evaluated with a 3-D digital microscope. The best fit to the experimental data is done by a design of experiment software.Results.The numerical formulas for the response surfaces of ablation speed and retropulsion amplitude are generated.Conclusions.The longer the pulse, the less the ablation or retropulsion, while the longer pulse makes the ablation decrease faster than the retropulsion. The best quadratic fit of the response surface for the volume of ablation varied nonlinearly with pulse duration and pulse number.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document