scholarly journals Use of Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, or Ticagrelor and Patient Outcome after Acute Coronary Syndrome in Austria from 2015 to 2017

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3398
Author(s):  
Safoura Sheikh Rezaei ◽  
Andreas Gleiss ◽  
Berthold Reichardt ◽  
Michael Wolzt

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy improves patient outcome after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but prescription differences of P2Y12 inhibitor treatments exist. The aim of the present investigation was to study the long-term utilization and patient outcomes of clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor in patients with ACS from 2015 to 2017 in Austria. Methods: Data from 13 Austrian health insurance funds of patients with a hospital discharge diagnosis of ACS for the years 2015 to 2017 were analyzed. The primary end point was to investigate the recurrence of ACS or death. Results: Of 49,124 P2Y12 inhibitor-naive patients with a hospital discharge diagnosis of ACS, 25,147 subjects filled a P2Y12 inhibitor prescription within 30 days after the index event. Of these patients, 10,626 (42.9%) subjects had a prescription for clopidogrel, 4788 (19.3%) for prasugrel, and 9383 (37.8%) for ticagrelor. Ticagrelor was the most frequently prescribed P2Y12 inhibitor among patients below 70 years old, and clopidogrel in those aged ≥70 years. Occurrence of an endpoint was highest in elderly patients. After adjustment for age, sex, and pre-existing medication as proxy for comorbidity, the hazard ratio for ACS or death for prasugrel vs. clopidogrel of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.61; 0.79) was similar to that of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel (0.70; 95% CI: 0.64; 0.77). Conclusion: Prescription of ticagrelor or prasugrel after ACS were associated with a lower risk of ACS recurrence or death compared to clopidogrel.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. e0223442
Author(s):  
Hawa O. Abu ◽  
Kate L. Lapane ◽  
Molly E. Waring ◽  
Christine M. Ulbricht ◽  
Randolph S. Devereaux ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Anamika Das ◽  
Melvin George ◽  
Durga Jha ◽  
Luxitaa Goenka

Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the leading cause for morbidity and mortality in developed countries. Numerous groups have explored single and multiple biomarker strategies to identify diagnostic prognosticators of ACS which will improve our ability to identify high-risk individuals. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-9) is one potential biomarker which has been widely studied in ACS. Recent reports have showed the prognostic utility of MMP-9, but due to inconsistent results, it has not been possible to draw firm conclusions. Objective: This review aims to explore the ability of MMP-9 to predict long-term prognosis of ACS. To clarify this issue, we conducted a literature review to provide a comprehensive assessment of MMP-9 levels in ACS patients. Method: We retrieved a total of 1501 articles from PubMed and Google Scholar. After thorough scrutiny, 12 original research articles were found fulfilling the inclusion exclusion criteria. MMP-9’s ability as a biomarker of prognostication post ACS was reviewed. PRISMA guidelines were used for reporting. Result: The results revealed that MMP-9, apart from being an efficient diagnostic biomarker for ACS, helps in predicting the future risk of ACS with disease outcome. Positive correlation was found between plasma MMP-9 and left ventricular remodeling. A positive association was also found between cardiovascular death and higher MMP-9 levels. Conclusion: MMP-9 can be a potential prognostic marker for ACS and aid in identifying high risk patients for intensive management during follow -up.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J.F Iglesias ◽  
D Heg ◽  
M Roffi ◽  
D Tueller ◽  
O Muller ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Newest generation drug-eluting stents (DES) combining ultrathin cobalt chromium platforms with biodegradable polymers may reduce target lesion failure (TLF) as compared to second generation DES among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). While previous studies indicated a potential benefit within the first two years after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it remains uncertain whether the clinical benefit persists after complete degradation of the polymer coating. Purpose To compare the long-term effects of ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES) versus thin-strut durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) for PCI in patients with ACS. Methods We performed a subgroup analysis of ACS patients included into the BIOSCIENCE trial (NCT01443104), a randomized trial comparing BP-SES with DP-EES. The primary endpoint of the present post-hoc analysis was TLF, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI) and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR), at 5 years. Results Among 2,119 patients enrolled between March 2012 and May 2013, 1,131 (53%) presented with ACS (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 36%). Compared to patients with stable CAD, ACS patients were younger, had a lower baseline cardiac risk profile, including a lower prevalence of hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral artery disease, and had a greater incidence of previous revascularization procedures. At 5 years, TLF occurred similarly in 89 patients (cumulative incidence, 16.9%) treated with BP-SES and 85 patients (16.0%) treated with DP-EES (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.78–1.41; p=0.78) in patients with ACS, and in 109 patients (24.1%) treated with BP-SES and 104 patients (21.8%) treated with DP-EES (RR 1.11; 95% CI 0.85–1.45; p=0.46) in stable CAD patients (p for interaction=0.77) (Figure 1, Panel A). Cumulative incidences of cardiac death (8% vs. 7%; p=0.66), target vessel MI (5.2% vs. 5.8%; p=0.66), clinically indicated TLR (8.9% vs. 8.3%; p=0.63) (Figure 1, Panel B-D), and definite thrombosis (1.4% vs. 1.0%; p=0.57) at 5 years were similar among ACS patients treated with ultrathin-strut BP-SES or thin-strut DP-EES. Overall, there was no interaction between clinical presentation and treatment effect of BP-SES versus DP-EES. Conclusion In a subgroup analysis of the BIOSCIENCE trial, we found no difference in long-term clinical outcomes between ACS patients treated with ultrathin-strut BP-SES or thin-strut DP-EES at five years. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Unrestricted research grant to the institution from Biotronik AG, Switzerland


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document