scholarly journals Unbiased Least-Squares Modelling

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 982
Author(s):  
Marta Gatto ◽  
Fabio Marcuzzi

In this paper we analyze the bias in a general linear least-squares parameter estimation problem, when it is caused by deterministic variables that have not been included in the model. We propose a method to substantially reduce this bias, under the hypothesis that some a-priori information on the magnitude of the modelled and unmodelled components of the model is known. We call this method Unbiased Least-Squares (ULS) parameter estimation and present here its essential properties and some numerical results on an applied example.

Geophysics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. R101-R111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Mejer Hansen ◽  
Andre G. Journel ◽  
Albert Tarantola ◽  
Klaus Mosegaard

Inverse problems in geophysics require the introduction of complex a priori information and are solved using computationally expensive Monte Carlo techniques (where large portions of the model space are explored). The geostatistical method allows for fast integration of complex a priori information in the form of covariance functions and training images. We combine geostatistical methods and inverse problem theory to generate realizations of the posterior probability density function of any Gaussian linear inverse problem, honoring a priori information in the form of a covariance function describing the spatial connectivity of the model space parameters. This is achieved using sequential Gaussian simulation, a well-known, noniterative geostatisticalmethod for generating samples of a Gaussian random field with a given covariance function. This work is a contribution to both linear inverse problem theory and geostatistics. Our main result is an efficient method to generate realizations, actual solutions rather than the conventional least-squares-based approach, to any Gaussian linear inverse problem using a noniterative method. The sequential approach to solving linear and weakly nonlinear problems is computationally efficient compared with traditional least-squares-based inversion. The sequential approach also allows one to solve the inverse problem in only a small part of the model space while conditioned to all available data. From a geostatistical point of view, the method can be used to condition realizations of Gaussian random fields to the possibly noisy linear average observations of the model space.


1979 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 387-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Hileman

abstract Phase times for an ensemble of 20 aftershocks of the June 1, 1975, Galway Lake earthquake were inverted to determine hypocenters and local velocity structure simultaneously. A maximum likelihood formulation of linear, least-squares inversion was used so that the data were weighted according to their estimated variances. A trade-off parameter controlled the relative importance of the RMS error and the amount by which the model changed at each iteration. Individual aftershocks must be selected so that a wide variety of travel paths are represented. Initial trials disclosed that careful constraints are necessary for allowed changes in station delays. Fixed velocity boundaries, based on a priori information, were used for each of several starting models, and only layer velocities were allowed to vary. Each of the trials indicated that shallow crustal velocities in the vincinity of Galway Lake are somewhat lower than those of the usual velocity models. The velocities are not strongly constrained by this data set, but the results are consistent with a subsequent, detailed refraction survey by other workers. Mapping the travel-time surface in time-depth-distance space helps clarify the limitations inherent in a given problem.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document