scholarly journals Lactobacillus Reuteri DSM 17938 (Limosilactobacillus reuteri) in Diarrhea and Constipation: Two Sides of the Same Coin?

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 643
Author(s):  
Angela Saviano ◽  
Mattia Brigida ◽  
Alessio Migneco ◽  
Gayani Gunawardena ◽  
Christian Zanza ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 (L. reuteri) is a probiotic that can colonize different human body sites, including primarily the gastrointestinal tract, but also the urinary tract, the skin, and breast milk. Literature data showed that the administration of L. reuteri can be beneficial to human health. The aim of this review was to summarize current knowledge on the role of L. reuteri in the management of gastrointestinal symptoms, abdominal pain, diarrhea and constipation, both in adults and children, which are frequent reasons for admission to the emergency department (ED), in order to promote the best selection of probiotic type in the treatment of these uncomfortable and common symptoms. Materials and Methods: We searched articles on PubMed® from January 2011 to January 2021. Results: Numerous clinical studies suggested that L. reuteri may be helpful in modulating gut microbiota, eliminating infections, and attenuating the gastrointestinal symptoms of enteric colitis, antibiotic-associated diarrhea (also related to the treatment of Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection), irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and chronic constipation. In both children and in adults, L. reuteri shortens the duration of acute infectious diarrhea and improves abdominal pain in patients with colitis or inflammatory bowel disease. It can ameliorate dyspepsia and symptoms of gastritis in patients with HP infection. Moreover, it improves gut motility and chronic constipation. Conclusion: Currently, probiotics are widely used to prevent and treat numerous gastrointestinal disorders. In our opinion, L. reuteri meets all the requirements to be considered a safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious probiotic that is able to contribute to the beneficial effects on gut-human health, preventing and treating many gastrointestinal symptoms, and speeding up the recovery and discharge of patients accessing the emergency department.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Colombo ◽  
Chance S. Friesen ◽  
Uttam Garg ◽  
Craig A. Friesen ◽  
William San Pablo

AbstractAbdominal pain has been associated with disaccharidase deficiencies. While relationships with individual symptoms have been assessed, relationships between disaccharidase deficiencies and symptom complexes or inflammation have not been evaluated in this group. The primary aims of the current study were to assess relationships between disaccharidase deficiency and symptoms or symptom complexes and duodenal inflammation, respectively. Patients with abdominal pain who underwent endoscopy with evaluation of disaccharidase activity levels were identified. After excluding all patients with inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, H. pylori, or gross endoscopic lesions, patients were evaluated for disaccharidase deficiency frequency. Disaccharidase were compared between patients with and without histologic duodenitis. Lastly, relationships between individual gastrointestinal symptoms or symptom complexes were evaluated. Lactase deficiency was found in 34.3% of patients and disaccharidase pan-deficiency in 7.6%. No individual symptoms or symptom complexes predicted disaccharidase deficiency. While duodenitis was not associated with disaccharidase deficiency, it was only present in 5.9% of patients. Disaccharidase deficiency, particularly lactase deficiency, is common in youth with abdominal pain and multiple deficiencies are not uncommon. Disaccharidase deficiency cannot be predicted by symptoms in this population. Further studies are needed to assess the clinical significance of disaccharidase deficiency.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-223
Author(s):  
Marco Vincenzo Lenti ◽  
Sara Cococcia ◽  
Jihane Ghorayeb ◽  
Antonio Di Sabatino ◽  
Christian P. Selinger

AbstractInflammatory bowel disease, which includes Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, is an immune-mediated, chronic relapsing disorder characterised by severe gastrointestinal symptoms that dramatically impair patients’ quality of life, affecting psychological, physical, sexual, and social functions. As a consequence, patients suffering from this condition may perceive social stigmatisation, which is the identification of negative attributes that distinguish a person as different and worthy of separation from the group. Stigmatisation has been widely studied in different chronic conditions, especially in mental illnesses and HIV-infected patients. There is a growing interest also for patients with inflammatory bowel disease, in which the possibility of disease flare and surgery-related issues seem to be the most important factors determining stigmatisation. Conversely, resilience represents the quality that allows one to adopt a positive attitude and good adjustments despite adverse life events. Likewise, resilience has been studied in different populations, age groups, and chronic conditions, especially mental illnesses and cancer, but little is known about this issue in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, even if this could be an interesting area of research. Resilience can be strengthened through dedicated interventions that could potentially improve the ability to cope with the disease. In this paper, we focus on the current knowledge of stigmatisation and resilience in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 88-89
Author(s):  
T Chhibba ◽  
R Panaccione ◽  
C Seow ◽  
C Lu ◽  
K L Novak ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) suffer a substantial burden of morbidity related to chronic abdominal pain and are susceptible to opioid dependence and abuse that is associated with increased rates of depression, hospitalization, and mortality. While opioid prescription and renewal by a single provider minimizes the long-term risk of misuse, many patients with IBD will seek out care in the emergency department (ED) where short-term, ‘to-go’ use of narcotic analgesia is associated with potential treatment-related complications. Aims To assess rates of opioid prescription in IBD patients presenting to the ED and to assess factors associated with opioid use. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data collected in the United States National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) from 2006–2015. We compared a study population of adult IBD patients (International Classification of Diseases ICD-9 555.X, 556.X) ≥18 years discharged from the ED to a control group of patients presenting with non-specific abdominal pain (ICD-9 789.0, 564.1, 536.8). The proportion of patients given opioids in ED and at ED discharge were calculated with relative standard error (RSE), and national level estimates were produced using survey weights. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of opioid prescription at discharge, expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results A total of 767,577 IBD patients were compared to 71,359,257 patients with non-specific abdominal pain. A total of 37.3% (RSE 4.7%) of IBD patients compared to 24.7% (RSE 0.8%) of controls (p<0.01) received an opioid prescription on ED discharge. 49.1% (RSE 5.6%) of IBD patients compared to 37.2% (RSE 0.8%) of patients with non-specific abdominal pain (p=0.02) received an opioid while in ED. Significant predictors of narcotic prescription at discharge in multivariable analysis included: age <50 (OR 6.83 [95% CI: 1.21, 38.48], p=0.03), non-white race (OR 4.73 [95% CI: 1.46, 15.39], p=0.01), and narcotic use in the ED (OR 5.27 [95% CI: 1.96, 14.21], p<0.01). Conclusions Nearly 40% of IBD patients were prescribed an opioid at discharge from the ED. This rate is significantly higher than for patients who present with non-specific abdominal pain and younger, non-white IBD patients were disproportionately more likely to receive an opioid prescription. Given the risks associated with on-demand narcotic use in IBD patients, our data highlight a potential gap in care for accessing comprehensive pain management solutions. Funding Agencies None


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 202-204
Author(s):  
J Liu ◽  
A Aruljothy ◽  
N Narula ◽  
J Marshall

Abstract Background Interleukin 17 (IL-17) inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies that target IL-17A (secukinumab, ixekizumab) or the IL-17 receptor (brodalumab), are effective treatments for patients with psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). IL-17A inhibitors are rarely associated with new or worsening inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with an estimated incidence rate of 1.1/1000 patient-exposure years in Crohn’s disease (CD) and 1.0/1000 patient-exposure years in ulcerative colitis. Aims Describe 3 patients treated with IL-17 inhibitors who developed IBD. Methods Case series. Results Case 1: 50 year-old male with PsO developed bloody diarrhea after 2 months of ixekizumab therapy. Colonoscopy showed proctitis with a cobblestone appearance and anal ulceration. He failed topical 5-ASA and repeat colonoscopy 1 month later showed chronic inflammatory changes in the transverse colon and rectum. Patient was hospitalized for a right colonic perforation requiring hemicolectomy and loop ileostomy. Pathology showed mucosal ulcerations with acute transmural inflammation of the cecum, ascending colon, and ileum, with crypt architectural distortion and no granulomas. Colonoscopy 6 months later showed chronic mild patchy active colitis with granulomas. Infliximab and methotrexate were started with clinical remission of his CD and partial response of his PsO. Case 2: 39 year-old male with AS who failed golimumab and etanercept started on secukinumab, and reported acute worsening of diarrhea and abdominal pain. Colonoscopy after a year of persistent symptoms showed ulceration of the ileum and ileocecal valve. Biopsies showed mild active chronic ileitis, and architectural distortion with reactive lymphoid follicles in the right colon. He was treated with adalimumab with partial clinical response of his CD and AS. Case 3: 63 year-old female with PsA reported a 3 week history of diarrhea, abdominal pain, and fever. She was maintained on ixekizumab for 4 months and previously failed adalimumab, secukinumab, and etanercept. CT showed diffuse circumferential pancolonic wall thickening and terminal ileal involvement. Stool cultures and C. difficile were negative. CRP was 154.9 mg/L and fecal calprotectin was 1710 mcg/g. Colonoscopy showed patchy erythema and aphthous ulcers in the colon. Terminal ileal biopsies showed crypt architectural distortion and patchy acute inflammation. She started on infliximab therapy. Her diarrhea resolved prior to treatment, with no clinical improvement of her arthritis. Conclusions IL-17 inhibitors are effective in the treatment of PsO, PsA, and AS, however, in all cases described, it is unclear whether IL-17 inhibition led to new-onset IBD, or an exacerbation of previously asymptomatic IBD. Patients being considered for IL-17 inhibition with baseline gastrointestinal symptoms should be investigated for IBD. Funding Agencies None


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-261
Author(s):  
Melvin B. Heyman ◽  
Jay A. Perman ◽  
Linda D. Ferrell ◽  
M. Michael Thaler

The diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease rests on radiologic, endoscopic, and histologic creteria. Five patients, 2 to 17 years of age, sought medical attention because of chronic abdominal pain, diarrhea, and heme-positive stools. Rectal biopsies, visual inspection of colonic mucosa through the colonoscope, and contrast radiographs of the large and small intestine yielded nonspecific results. Serial endoscopic biopsies demonstrated a gradient of inflammatory changes diminishing in severity distally from the ileocecal valve and cecum. The disease process was most evident in specimens from the cecum, whereas biopsies distal to the transverse colon had a normal histologic appearance in all five patients. Biopsies from the proximal colon may provide evidence of inflammatory bowel disease not detectable using standard techniques. The combination of chronic abdominal pain, diarrhea, and heme-positive stools associated with inflammatory changes in biopsy specimens obtained from the proximal colon, but normal findings on radiologic, colonoscopic, and rectal biopsy examinations, may represent an early stage in the evolution of chronic nonspecific inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis or regional enteritis (Crohn disease).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document