scholarly journals Electrochemical Synthesis of Ammonia: Recent Efforts and Future Outlook

Membranes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garagounis ◽  
Vourros ◽  
Stoukides ◽  
Dasopoulos ◽  
Stoukides

Ammonia is a key chemical produced in huge quantities worldwide. Its primary industrial production is via the Haber-Bosch method; a process requiring high temperatures and pressures, and consuming large amounts of energy. In the past two decades, several alternatives to the existing process have been proposed, including the electrochemical synthesis. The present paper reviews literature concerning this approach and the experimental research carried out in aqueous, molten salt, or solid electrolyte cells, over the past three years. The electrochemical systems are grouped, described, and discussed according to the operating temperature, which is determined by the electrolyte used, and their performance is valuated. The problems which need to be addressed further in order to scale-up the electrochemical synthesis of ammonia to the industrial level are examined.

Author(s):  
Ioannis Garagounis ◽  
Vasileios Kyriakou ◽  
Aglaia Skodra ◽  
Eirini Vasileiou ◽  
Michael Stoukides

2019 ◽  
Vol 339 ◽  
pp. 115010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hwan Kim ◽  
Yong Sik Chung ◽  
Taewook Kim ◽  
Heechul Yoon ◽  
Jae Gi Sung ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 252-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naohiro SHIMODA ◽  
Yusuke KOBAYASHI ◽  
Yutaka KIMURA ◽  
Go NAKAGAWA ◽  
Shigeo SATOKAWA

Author(s):  
Don R. Edwards

The American Standards Association (ASA) B31.3-1959 Petroleum Refinery Piping Code [1] grew out of an ASA document that addressed all manner of fluid conveying piping systems. ASA B31.3 was created long before widespread engineering use of computer “mainframes” or even before the inception of piping stress analysis software. Also as B31.3 continued to pass thru standards organizations from ASA, ANSI, to ASME, the B31.3 Process Piping Code [2] (hereafter referred to as the “Code”) has remained ambiguous over the past few decades in several areas. The displacement stress range, SE, has always been explicitly defined by both verbiage and equation. Yet, the sustained condition(s) stress, SL, is mentioned not with an explicit equation but with a statement that the sustained stress shall be limited by the allowable stress at the corresponding operating temperature, Sh. Also one might infer from the vague verbiage in the Code that there is only one sustained condition; this would also be an incorrect inference. Also, assumptions would then have to be made as to which supports are allowed to be included in a sustained analysis based on whether the piping “lifts-off” any of the pipe supports during the corresponding operating condition. This paper describes the subtle yet possibly radical concepts that are included in the (recently approved for inclusion into) ASME B31.3-2006 Appendix S Example S2. This paper discusses: • when and in what manner the most severe set of operating temperature and pressure is to be used; • the concept of “sustained condition” and multiple “anticipated” sustained conditions; • determining the support scenario(s) for each anticipated sustained condition; • establishing the most severe sustained condition to evaluate and determine the stress due to sustained loads, SL; • utilizing an equation with sustained stress indices to evaluate SL; • establishing the least severe sustained condition and its effect in determining the largest displacement stress range, SE.


Small Methods ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 1800324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Yao ◽  
Qi Feng ◽  
Shangqian Zhu ◽  
Jiadong Li ◽  
Yuze Yao ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 1620-1625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Hyun Park ◽  
Hyung Chul Yoon ◽  
Jong-Nam Kim ◽  
Chan-Hee Jeong ◽  
Eun-Young Jeong ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenbin Sun ◽  
Jiechen Li ◽  
Wen Gao ◽  
Luyao Kang ◽  
Fengcai Lei ◽  
...  

The electrocatalytic urea oxidation reaction (UOR) has attracted substantial research interests during the past few years owing to its critical role in coupled electrochemical systems for energy conversion, for example,...


Author(s):  
Luis Perez-Breva ◽  
Nick Fuhrer

Organizations don’t just grown on their own. You build them, and you may end up building multiple organizations, each one atop the previous one. The scale-up logic is straightforward: You present what you did (the past) to motivate where you will go (the future), but what you work on is the middle (the present). Most emerging organizations fail because they build for the future having ignored the entire present. But you don’t have to worry about whether a decision is optimal for that rosy future—it just needs to work today. As you build the next organization, you’ll reuse parts from the old one and you’ll get to implement everything you’ve learned. Growth and scale-up work like problem solving: no one cares how you first came up with the solution. The organization that systematizes your current innovation prototype is your first big milestone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document