scholarly journals Improving the Efficiency of New Automatic Dishwashing Detergent Formulation by Addition of Thermostable Lipase, Protease and Amylase

Molecules ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashwini Naganthran ◽  
Malihe Masomian ◽  
Raja Noor Rahman ◽  
Mohd Ali ◽  
Hisham Nooh
2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izuddin Abdul Rahman ◽  
Raja Noor Zaliha Raja Abdul Rahman ◽  
Abu Bakar Salleh ◽  
Mahiran Basri

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 299-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Bozetine ◽  
T. Ahmed Zaïd ◽  
C. E. Chitour ◽  
J. P. Canselier

2003 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
JERZY LUKASIK ◽  
MICHAEL L. BRADLEY ◽  
TROY M. SCOTT ◽  
MABEL DEA ◽  
ANDREW KOO ◽  
...  

The efficacy levels of different physical and chemical washing treatments in the reduction of viral and bacterial pathogens from inoculated strawberries were evaluated. Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Montevideo, poliovirus 1, and the bacteriophages PRD1, φX174, and MS2 were used as model and surrogate organisms. Chemicals readily available to producers and/or consumers were evaluated as antimicrobial additives for the production of washes. The gentle agitation of contaminated strawberries in water for 2 min led to reductions in microbial populations ranging from 41 to 79% and from 62 to 90% at water temperatures of 22 and 43°C, respectively. Significant reductions (>98%) in numbers of bacteria and viruses were obtained with sodium hypochlorite (50 to 300 ppm of free chlorine), Oxine or Carnebon (200 ppm of product generating “stabilized chlorine dioxide”), Tsunami (100 ppm of peroxyacetic acid), and Alcide (100 or 200 ppm of acidified sodium chlorite) washes. Overall, 200 ppm of acidified sodium chlorite produced the greatest reductions of microorganisms. Hydrogen peroxide (0.5%) was slightly less effective than free chlorine in a strawberry wash and caused slight fruit discoloration. Cetylpyridinium chloride (0.1%) was effective in the reduction of bacterial species, while trisodium phosphate (1%) was effective against viruses. The consumer-oriented produce wash Fit was very effective (>99%) in reducing the numbers of bacteria but not in reducing the numbers of viruses. Another wash, Healthy Harvest, was significantly less effective than Fit in reducing bacterial pathogens but more effective for viruses. The performance of automatic dishwashing detergent was similar to that of Healthy Harvest and significantly better than that of liquid dishwashing detergent. Solutions containing table salt (2% NaCl) or vinegar (10%) reduced the numbers of bacteria by about 90%, whereas only the vinegar wash reduced the numbers of viruses significantly (ca. 95%).


2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar Edurman García-Silvera ◽  
Fernando Martínez-Morales ◽  
Brandt Bertrand ◽  
Daniel Morales-Guzmán ◽  
Nashbly Sarela Rosas-Galván ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 177-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Ginalska ◽  
R. Bancerz ◽  
T. Korniłłowicz-Kowalska
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 735 ◽  
pp. 136-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nik Raikhan Nik Him ◽  
Nurul Shafika Azmi

Enzyme-added detergent must have the capability to operate at high temperature to support the enzyme proteins to clean soiled-fabrics at optimum conditions. Lipase from Bacillus stearothermophilus nr22 (Lip.nr-22) has improved the oil removal from soiled-cotton fabric by 38.8-51.4% in 4 types of local commercial detergents. The later was the oil removal from an unrevealed detergent. The optimum conditions were 108U/ml Lip.nr-22 in 0.1M, pH 7.0, washing temperature and washing time interval as 80°C and 40 min, respectively; shaking wash at 300 rpm and percentage of detergent concentration as 0.5. Lip.nr-22 is a very potential enzyme in high temperature-neutral pH operated laundry detergent formulations. It has exhibited a very excellent thermostability at 80°C, was very stable with surfactants, commercial detergents as well as with oxidizing agents (H2O2, NaBO3H2O and NaClO). Lip.nr-22 as additive in detergent formulation is a promise for better detergent formulation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 2917-2934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fairolniza Mohd Shariff ◽  
Raja Noor Zaliha Raja Abd. Rahman ◽  
Mahiran Basri ◽  
Abu Bakar Salleh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document