scholarly journals Tell Them How They Did: Feedback on Operator Performance Helps Calibrate Perceived Ease of Use in Automated Driving

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannick Forster ◽  
Sebastian Hergeth ◽  
Frederik Naujoks ◽  
Josef Krems ◽  
Andreas Keinath
Keyword(s):  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Use Case ◽  
Perceived Ease Of Use ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Human Machine Interfaces ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Over Time

The development of automated driving will profit from an agreed-upon methodology to evaluate human–machine interfaces. The present study examines the role of feedback on interaction performance provided directly to participants when interacting with driving automation (i.e., perceived ease of use). In addition, the development of ratings itself over time and use case specificity were examined. In a driving simulator study, N = 55 participants completed several transitions between Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) level 0, level 2, and level 3 automated driving. One half of the participants received feedback on their interaction performance immediately after each use case, while the other half did not. As expected, the results revealed that participants judged the interactions to become easier over time. However, a use case specificity was present, as transitions to L0 did not show effects over time. The role of feedback also depended on the respective use case. We observed more conservative evaluations when feedback was provided than when it was not. The present study supports the application of perceived ease of use as a diagnostic measure in interaction with automated driving. Evaluations of interfaces can benefit from supporting feedback to obtain more conservative results.

scholarly journals Communications and Driver Monitoring Aids for Fostering SAE Level-4 Road Vehicles Automation

Electronics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Jiménez ◽  
José Naranjo ◽  
Sofía Sánchez ◽  
Francisco Serradilla ◽  
Elisa Pérez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cooperative Systems ◽  
Automated Vehicles ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Road Vehicles ◽  
Driver Monitoring ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Assistance Systems ◽  
Level 2

Road vehicles include more and more assistance systems that perform tasks to facilitate driving and make it safer and more efficient. However, the automated vehicles currently on the market do not exceed SAE level 2 and only in some cases reach level 3. Nevertheless, the qualitative and technological leap needed to reach level 4 is significant and numerous uncertainties remain. In this sense, a greater knowledge of the environment is needed for better decision making and the role of the driver changes substantially. This paper proposes the combination of cooperative systems with automated driving to offer a wider range of information to the vehicle than on-board sensors currently provide. This includes the actual deployment of a cooperative corridor on a highway. It also takes into account that in some circumstances or scenarios, pre-set or detected by on-board sensors or previous communications, the vehicle must hand back control to the driver, who may have been performing other tasks completely unrelated to supervising the driving. It is thus necessary to assess the driver’s condition as regards retaking control and to provide assistance for a safe transition.

scholarly journals Transitions Between Highly Automated and Longitudinally Assisted Driving: The Role of the Initiator in the Fight for Authority

2020 ◽  
pp. 001872082094618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Maggi ◽  
Richard Romano ◽  
Oliver Carsten
Keyword(s):  
Road Safety ◽  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Safety Issues ◽  
The Road ◽  
Operational Design ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Driving Task

Objective A driving simulator study explored how drivers behaved depending on their initial role during transitions between highly automated driving (HAD) and longitudinally assisted driving (via adaptive cruise control). Background During HAD, drivers might issue a take-over request (TOR), initiating a transition of control that was not planned. Understanding how drivers behave in this situation and, ultimately, the implications on road safety is of paramount importance. Method Sixteen participants were recruited for this study and performed transitions of control between HAD and longitudinally assisted driving in a driving simulator. While comparing how drivers behaved depending on whether or not they were the initiators, different handover strategies were presented to analyze how drivers adapted to variations in the authority level they were granted at various stages of the transitions. Results Whenever they initiated the transition, drivers were more engaged with the driving task and less prone to follow the guidance of the proposed strategies. Moreover, initiating a transition and having the highest authority share during the handover made the drivers more engaged with the driving task and attentive toward the road. Conclusion Handover strategies that retained a larger authority share were more effective whenever the automation initiated the transition. Under driver-initiated transitions, reducing drivers’ authority was detrimental for both performance and comfort. Application As the operational design domain of automated vehicles (Society of Automotive Engineers [SAE] Level 3/4) expands, the drivers might very well fight boredom by taking over spontaneously, introducing safety issues so far not considered but nevertheless very important.

scholarly journals Does Adaptive Mode Transition Contribute to Better Driver Intervention in Highly Automated Driving?

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 287-291
Author(s):  
Huiping Zhou ◽  
Makoto Itoh ◽  
Satoshi Kitazaki
Keyword(s):  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Mode Transition ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Automated Control ◽  
Human Driver ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level Transition ◽  
Verbal Messages ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Highly Automated Driving

This paper presents an adaptive mode (level) transition in highly combined driving automation in which the mode of a system could adaptively shift to any level including SAE level 3 (conditional automation, CA) to level 2 (partial automation) based on the driving environment. We show the effects of the adaptive transition on the take over of car control by a human driver and driving behavior after intervention when the system issues a response to intervene. A driving simulator experiment is conducted to collect data during the transition from automated control to manual driving in three scenes: obstacle on a driving lane, blurred lane mark, and stopped car ahead. Results indicate that the interventions of drivers who experience the adaptive transition are delayed in comparison to those who experience only the fixed transition. The adaptive transition is conducive for drivers to stop the car for preventing a potential collision with a stopped car ahead. Owing to the adaptive transition, drivers perceive a critical hazard after taking over car control and provide a rapid response. In addition, during the adaptive transition, drivers prefer verbal messages to the simple “beeping” message.

scholarly journals Driver seat comfort for level 3-4 autonomous vehicles

Work ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 68 (s1) ◽  
pp. S111-S118
Author(s):  
Neil J. Mansfield ◽  
Kartikeya Walia ◽  
Aditya Singh
Keyword(s):  
Autonomous Vehicles ◽  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Case Methods ◽  
Driving Mode ◽  
Full Control ◽  
Seat Comfort ◽  
Autonomous Mode ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 2

BACKGROUND: Autonomous vehicles can be classified on a scale of automation from 0 to 5, where level 0 corresponds to vehicles that have no automation to level 5 where the vehicle is fully autonomous and it is not possible for the human occupant to take control. At level 2, the driver needs to retain attention as they are in control of at least some systems. Level 3-4 vehicles are capable of full control but the human occupant might be required to, or desire to, intervene in some circumstances. This means that there could be extended periods of time where the driver is relaxed, but other periods of time when they need to drive. OBJECTIVE: The seat must therefore be designed to be comfortable in at least two different types of use case. METHODS: This driving simulator study compares the comfort experienced in a seat from a production hybrid vehicle whilst being used in a manual driving mode and in autonomous mode for a range of postures. RESULTS: It highlights how discomfort is worse for cases where the posture is non-optimal for the task. It also investigates the design of head and neckrests to mitigate neck discomfort, and shows that a well-designed neckrest is beneficial for drivers in autonomous mode.

scholarly journals Determinant of users’ intention to adopt Pahang Mart on-line Portal in Malaysia: The role of perceived ease of use

2021 ◽  
Vol 1874 (1) ◽  
pp. 012049
Author(s):  
Wan Hashridz Rizal bin Wan Abu Bakar ◽  
Nur Aulia Fahada binti Misaridin ◽  
Mohammad Zulfakhairi bin Mokhtar
Keyword(s):  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Perceived Ease Of Use ◽  
Intention To Adopt ◽  
On Line

Consumer E-Loyalty for E-Grocery Shopping in a Metro City of India

2021 ◽  
pp. 1612-1632
Author(s):  
Sablu Khan ◽  
Adil Khan
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Purchase Behavior ◽  
Grocery Shopping ◽  
Perceived Ease Of Use ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Grocery Purchase ◽  
Flow Variables

This study focuses on the e-loyalty of the grocery consumers. Understanding online behavior in developing countries is an emerging issue in these days. The purpose of this research is to examine the effects of antecedents of flow on attitude and perceived ease of use in the context of online grocery purchase behavior in a developing country perspective. Further, the study also examines the role of attitude and perceived ease of use in building e-loyalty. The present study analyzes the data of 250 respondents collected through an online survey. The data were analyzed employing exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and structural equational modeling (SEM). The results show that the flow variables (concentration and enjoyment) have a positive but differential effect on attitude towards online grocery purchase. However, both concentration and enjoyment were equally important in influencing the perceived ease of use. The study also found that attitude positively influences the e-loyalty, and perceived ease of use influences both attitude and e-loyalty.

scholarly journals Mode Awareness and Automated Driving—What Is It and How Can It Be Measured?

Information ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Kurpiers ◽  
Bianca Biebl ◽  
Julia Mejia Hernandez ◽  
Florian Raisch
Keyword(s):  
Gold Standard ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Active System ◽  
Operational Design ◽  
Automation Systems ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
No Gold Standard ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Initial Instruction

In SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) Level 2, the driver has to monitor the traffic situation and system performance at all times, whereas the system assumes responsibility within a certain operational design domain in SAE Level 3. The different responsibility allocation in these automation modes requires the driver to always be aware of the currently active system and its limits to ensure a safe drive. For that reason, current research focuses on identifying factors that might promote mode awareness. There is, however, no gold standard for measuring mode awareness and different approaches are used to assess this highly complex construct. This circumstance complicates the comparability and validity of study results. We thus propose a measurement method that combines the knowledge and the behavior pillar of mode awareness. The latter is represented by the relational attention ratio in manual, Level 2 and Level 3 driving as well as the controllability of a system limit in Level 2. The knowledge aspect of mode awareness is operationalized by a questionnaire on the mental model for the automation systems after an initial instruction as well as an extensive enquiry following the driving sequence. Further assessments of system trust, engagement in non-driving related tasks and subjective mode awareness are proposed.

The Chief Executive Officer

2011 ◽  
pp. 1-37
Author(s):  
Petter Gottschalk
Keyword(s):  
Chief Executive Officer ◽  
Chief Executive ◽  
Chief Information Officer ◽  
Senior Executives ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Ceo Successions ◽  
Level 2

The chief executive officer (CEO) is the only executive at level 1 in the hierarchy of an organization (Carpenter & Wade, 2002). All other executives in the organization are at lower levels. At level 2, we find the most senior executives. Level 3 includes the next tier of executives. In our perspective of promoting the chief information officer (CIO) to be the next CEO, we first have to understand the role of the CEO. Therefore, the first chapter of this book is dedicated to the topic of CEO successions (Zhang & Rajagopalan, 2004).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document