scholarly journals Association between Protein Intake and Skeletal Muscle Mass among Community-Dwelling Older Japanese: Results from the DOSANCO Health Study: A Cross-Sectional Study

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 187
Author(s):  
Akinori Yaegashi ◽  
Takashi Kimura ◽  
Takumi Hirata ◽  
Shigekazu Ukawa ◽  
Koshi Nakamura ◽  
...  

Whether the source of dietary protein intake is related to appendicular skeletal muscle mass (AMM) and muscle mass (MM) remains unclear. We conducted this cross-sectional study of 277 residents (115 men, 162 women) aged ≥65 years in Japan to examine the association of the amount of dietary protein intake with AMM and MM. We measured dietary protein intake using a brief self-administered diet history questionnaire. AMM and MM were assessed based on bioelectrical impedance. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to estimate β coefficients that were adjusted for potential confounders. Among Japanese women aged ≥75 years, but not among women aged 65–74 years, dietary animal protein intake was significantly associated with AMM (β (95% confidence interval (CI)): 0.25 (0.10, 0.40)) and MM (β (95% CI): 0.40 (0.16, 0.64)). However, dietary vegetable protein intake was not associated with AMM (β (95% CI): −0.17 (−0.74, 0.41)) and MM (β (95% CI): −0.30 (−1.23, 0.63)). Furthermore, in men aged ≥65 years, dietary protein intake was not associated with AMM or MM. In conclusion, dietary animal protein intake, but not vegetable protein intake, were positively associated with AMM and MM among this population of Japanese women aged ≥75 years.

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2794
Author(s):  
Grith Højfeldt ◽  
Yusuke Nishimura ◽  
Kenneth Mertz ◽  
Simon R. Schacht ◽  
Jonas Lindberg ◽  
...  

Dietary protein has a pivotal role in muscle mass maintenance with advancing age. However, an optimal dose and distribution of protein intake across the day as well as the interaction with energy intake for the maintenance of muscle mass and physical function in healthy older adults remain to be fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between muscle mass, strength, and physical function, and the total amount and distribution of protein and energy intake across the day in healthy older individuals. The research question was addressed in a cross-sectional study including 184 Danish men and woman (age: 70.2 ± 3.9 years, body mass: 74.9 ± 12.1 kg, Body Mass Index (BMI): 25.4 ± 3.7 kg/m2) where a 3-day dietary registration, muscle mass, strength, and functional measurements were collected. We found that neither daily total protein intake nor distribution throughout the day were associated with muscle mass, strength, or physical function. Consequently, we do not provide an incentive for healthy older Danish individuals who already adhere to the current internationally accepted recommended dietary protein intake (0.83 g/kg/day) to change dietary protein intake or its distribution pattern throughout the day.


2017 ◽  
Vol 135 (5) ◽  
pp. 434-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Aurélio Carvalho Sampaio ◽  
Priscila Yukari Sewo Sampaio ◽  
Luz Albany Arcila Castaño ◽  
João Francisco Barbieri ◽  
Hélio José Coelho Júnior ◽  
...  

Nefrología ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 647-654
Author(s):  
Guillermina Barril ◽  
Angel Nogueira ◽  
Mar Ruperto López ◽  
Yone Castro ◽  
José Antonio Sánchez-Tomero

Maturitas ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 404-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Di Monaco ◽  
Fulvia Vallero ◽  
Roberto Di Monaco ◽  
Rosa Tappero ◽  
Alberto Cavanna

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (7) ◽  
pp. 1029-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra M. Boland ◽  
Todd M. Gibson ◽  
Lu Lu ◽  
Sue C. Kaste ◽  
James P. DeLany ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are at risk for low lean muscle mass and muscle weakness, which may contribute to inactivity and early development of chronic diseases typically seen in older adults. Although increasing protein intake, in combination with resistance training, improves lean muscle mass in other populations, it is not known whether muscular tissue among survivors of ALL, whose impairments are treatment-related, will respond similarly. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate associations among dietary protein intake, resistance training, and lean muscle mass in survivors of ALL and age-, sex-, and race-matched controls. Design This was a cross-sectional study. Methods Lean muscle mass was determined with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, dietary information with 24-hour recalls, and participation in resistance training with a questionnaire. Participants were 365 survivors of ALL (52% male; 87% white; median age=28.5 years, range=23.6–31.7) and 365 controls with no previous cancer. Results Compared with controls, survivors of ALL had lower lean muscle mass (55.0 versus 57.2 kg, respectively) and lower percentage of lean muscle mass (68.6% versus 71.4%, respectively) than controls. Similar proportions of survivors (71.1%) and controls (69.7%) met recommended dietary protein intake (0.8 g/kg/d). Survivors (45.4%) were less likely to report resistance training than controls (53.8%). In adjusted models, 1-g higher protein intake per kilogram of body mass per day was associated with a 7.9% increase and resistance training ≥1×wk, with a 2.8% increase in lean muscle mass. Limitations The cross-sectional study design limits temporal evaluation of the association between protein intake and lean muscle mass. Conclusions The findings suggest that survivors of childhood ALL with low lean muscle mass may benefit from optimizing dietary protein intake in combination with resistance training. Research is needed to determine whether resistance training with protein supplementation improves lean muscle mass in survivors of childhood ALL.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1425.2-1425
Author(s):  
E. Jalila ◽  
H. Azzouzi ◽  
I. Linda

Background:Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were at risk for altered body composition with higher prevalence of sarcopenia compared to the general population. Low lean muscle mass may constitute an additional risk factor for altered bone density in RA patients.Objectives:We aimed to study the prevalence of sarcopenia and to assess its predictive factors in Moroccan patients with RA.Methods:We conducted a cross-sectional study over two months in our department of rheumatology. All RA patients fulfilled ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria. We performed a whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to measure lean mass, fat mass and bone mass in the whole body and body parts. The appendicular skeletal muscle mass was assessed using the sum of skeletal muscle mass in the arms and legs. The relative skeletal muscle mass index (RSMI) was calculated from the appendicular skeletal mass divided by the square of the patient’s height (kg/m2). According to Baumgartner et al, sarcopenia was defined as a relative SMI <5.5 kg/m2on women and <7.26 kg/m2on men. Body mass index (BMI) was measured and patients were classified according to World Health Organization. Disease activity and functional disability were measured using the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) with CRP and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Comorbidities and medication use including corticosteroids were also recorded. Data was entered and processed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 20. A univariate analysis as well as multivariate regressions were carried out to assess the association between sarcopenia and lumbar spine and femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD) and RA characteristics.Results:We included 70 (87.5%) women and 10 (12.5%) men with a mean age of 53.59 ±10.96 years old. They had a mean disease duration of 12.35± 8.68, a mean DAS 28 CRP of 2.64±1.34, a mean HAQ of 0.94±0.63 and a mean RSMI of 5.75±1.17. Women had a mean RSMI of 6.33±1.04 while men had a mean RSMI of 5.66±1.17. The prevalence of sarcopenia in our population was 47.4% (37), of whom 81.1% (30) women.In univariate regression analysis, sarcopenia was associated with normal BMI (OR: 8.59, 95% CI [3.054-24.182], p= 0.000), DAS 28 CRP (OR: 1.78, 95% CI [1.203-2.657], p= 0.004), HAQ (OR: 2.15, 95% CI [1.165-5.433], p= 0.019), lumbar spine BMD (OR: 0.001, 95% CI [0.00001-0.043], p= 0.0004) and FN BMD (OR: 0.000006, 95% CI [0.000-0.002], p= 0,00008 at right FN and OR: 0.00009, 95% CI [0.000001-0.010], p=0.000 at left FN, respectively).In multiple regression analysis, sarcopenia was associated with normal BMI (OR: 11.56, 95% CI [2.754–48.598]), p=0.001 and FN BMD (OR: 0.00, 95% CI [0.000–0.084], p = 0.006).Conclusion:In the present study, sarcopenia was common among RA patients and associated with normal BMI and femoral neck BMD, emphasizing the importance of this modifiable risk factor. Further studies are needed to identify effective means to improve lean muscle mass in patients with RA.References:[1]Mochizuki T et al. Sarcopenia-associated factors in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A cross-sectional study. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2019;19 (9), 907-912[2]Okano T et al. Loss of lean body mass affects low bone mineral density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis -results from the TOMORROW study-, Modern Rheumatology. 2017;27(6):1-19.[4]Peggy M. Cawthon. Assessment of Lean Mass and Physical Performance in Sarcopenia. Journal of Clinical Densitometry. 2015;18(4):467-71.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Pugliesi Abdalla ◽  
Ana Cláudia Rossini Venturini ◽  
André Pereira dos Santos ◽  
Marcio Tasinafo ◽  
José Augusto Gonçalves Marini ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeon-Ki Kim ◽  
Hanako Chijiki ◽  
Mayuko Fukazawa ◽  
Jin Okubo ◽  
Mamiho Ozaki ◽  
...  

Background: The effects of different intake patterns of meal protein on muscle mass have not been clarified. We cross-sectionally and longitudinally examined the effect of different timing of protein intake on sarcopenia-related factors in older adults.Methods: This cross-sectional study 1 included 219 (male, n = 69, female, n = 150) elderly subjects aged ≥65 years. Subjects who consumed more protein at breakfast than at dinner were grouped into the morning group (MG, n = 76; male, n = 26; female, n = 50), and those who consumed more protein at dinner than at breakfast were grouped into the evening group (EG, n = 143; male, n = 43; female, n = 100). In cross-sectional study 2-1 (female, n = 125), the subjects were classified into four groups according to the number of meals with sufficient protein intake. In cross-sectional studies 2-2 (female, n = 125) and 2-3 (female, n = 27), the subjects were classified into eight groups and three groups according to whether they had consumed sufficient protein at three meals; sarcopenia-related factors were compared. The intervention study was a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized controlled trial that included 40 elderly women with low daily breakfast protein intake. The subjects were divided into four groups: morning protein and placebo intake groups and evening protein and placebo intake groups. Each group consumed the test food (containing 10 g milk protein) or placebo in the morning or evening for 12 weeks. Blood indices and physical function were assessed before and after the intervention.Results: Comparing all subjects, MG showed significantly higher handgrip strength than did EG (P &lt; 0.05). The higher ratio of morning protein intake relative to the total protein intake, the better the muscle mass (r = 0.452, P &lt; 0.05) and handgrip strength (r = 0.383, P &lt; 0.05). The intervention study showed an increase in muscle mass with the intake of milk protein in the morning rather than in the evening (P &lt; 0.05).Conclusions: Protein intake at breakfast might have relatively stronger effects on skeletal muscle mass than at lunch and dinner.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document