scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in 314 Japanese Patients with Bacterial Endophthalmitis: A Multicenter Cohort Study from J-CREST

Pathogens ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 390
Author(s):  
Hiroto Ishikawa ◽  
Kazutaka Uchida ◽  
Yoshio Takesue ◽  
Junya Mori ◽  
Takamasa Kinoshita ◽  
...  

Bacterial endophthalmitis is an intraocular infection that causes rapid vison loss. Pathogens can infect the intraocular space directly (exogenous endophthalmitis (ExE)) or indirectly (endogenous endophthalmitis (EnE)). To identify predictive factors for the visual prognosis of Japanese patients with bacterial endophthalmitis, we retrospectively examined the bacterial endophthalmitis characteristics of 314 Japanese patients and performed statistics using these clinical data. Older patients, with significantly more severe clinical symptoms, were prevalent in the ExE group compared with the EnE group. However, the final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was not significantly different between the ExE and EnE groups. Bacteria isolated from patients were not associated with age, sex, or presence of eye symptoms. Genus Streptococcus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Enterococcus were more prevalent in ExE patients than EnE patients and contributed to poor final BCVA. The presence of eye pain, bacterial identification, and poor BCVA at baseline were risk factors for final visual impairment.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Yusuke Hiratsuka ◽  
Daye Kim ◽  
Sang-Yeon Suh ◽  
Sun-Hyun Kim ◽  
Seok-Joon Yoon ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Accurate prognostication is important for patients and their families to prepare for the end of life. Objective Prognostic Score (OPS) is an easy-to-use tool that does not require the clinicians’ prediction of survival (CPS), whereas Palliative Prognostic Score (PaP) needs CPS. Thus, inexperienced clinicians may hesitate to use PaP. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of OPS compared with PaP in inpatients in palliative care units (PCUs) in three East Asian countries. Method This study was a secondary analysis of a cross-cultural, multicenter cohort study. We enrolled inpatients with far-advanced cancer in PCUs in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan from 2017 to 2018. We calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve to compare the accuracy of OPS and PaP. Results A total of 1,628 inpatients in 33 PCUs in Japan and Korea were analyzed. OPS and PaP were calculated in 71.7% of the Japanese patients and 80.0% of the Korean patients. In Taiwan, PaP was calculated for 81.6% of the patients. The AUROC for 3-week survival was 0.74 for OPS in Japan, 0.68 for OPS in Korea, 0.80 for PaP in Japan, and 0.73 for PaP in Korea. The AUROC for 30-day survival was 0.70 for OPS in Japan, 0.71 for OPS in Korea, 0.79 for PaP in Japan, and 0.74 for PaP in Korea. Significance of results Both OPS and PaP showed good performance in Japan and Korea. Compared with PaP, OPS could be more useful for inexperienced physicians who hesitate to estimate CPS.



2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bei Mao ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Yan-hua Chai ◽  
Xiao-yan Jin ◽  
Hai Wen Luo ◽  
...  






Author(s):  
Walusa Assad Gonçalves-Ferri ◽  
Francisco Eulógio Martinez ◽  
Fábia Pereira Martins-Celini ◽  
João Henrique Carvalho Leme de Almeida ◽  
Renato Procianoy ◽  
...  


Author(s):  
Yimin Li ◽  
Xiaohui Jia ◽  
Xiaolin Sun ◽  
Lianjie Shi ◽  
Fuan Lin ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document