scholarly journals External Evaluation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models and Bayes-Based Dosing of Infliximab

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1191
Author(s):  
Celine Konecki ◽  
Catherine Feliu ◽  
Yoann Cazaubon ◽  
Delphine Giusti ◽  
Marcelle Tonye-Libyh ◽  
...  

Despite the well-demonstrated efficacy of infliximab in inflammatory diseases, treatment failure remains frequent. Dose adjustment using Bayesian methods has shown in silico its interest in achieving target plasma concentrations. However, most of the published models have not been fully validated in accordance with the recommendations. This study aimed to submit these models to an external evaluation and verify their predictive capabilities. Eight models were selected for external evaluation, carried out on an independent database (409 concentrations from 157 patients). Each model was evaluated based on the following parameters: goodness-of-fit (comparison of predictions to observations), residual error model (population weighted residuals (PWRES), individual weighted residuals (IWRES), and normalized prediction distribution errors (NPDE)), and predictive performances (prediction-corrected visual predictive checks (pcVPC) and Bayesian simulations). The performances observed during this external evaluation varied greatly from one model to another. The eight evaluated models showed a significant bias in population predictions (from −7.19 to 7.38 mg/L). Individual predictions showed acceptable bias and precision for six of the eight models (mean error of −0.74 to −0.29 mg/L and mean percent error of −16.6 to −0.4%). Analysis of NPDE and pcVPC confirmed these results and revealed a problem with the inclusion of several covariates (weight, concomitant immunomodulatory treatment, presence of anti-drug antibodies). This external evaluation showed satisfactory results for some models, notably models A and B, and highlighted several prospects for improving the pharmacokinetic models of infliximab for clinical-biological application.

Author(s):  
Ya-qian Li ◽  
Kai-feng Chen ◽  
Jun-jie Ding ◽  
Hong-yi Tan ◽  
Nan Yang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S446-S446
Author(s):  
S Stodtmann ◽  
A Friedel ◽  
W Zhou ◽  
M E MOHAMED

Abstract Background Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral selective JAK1 inhibitor, is being developed for treatment of patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) in addition to several other inflammatory diseases. UPA has shown favourable efficacy and acceptable safety in UC in an 8-week double-blind placebo-controlled dose-ranging Phase 2b induction study in subjects with moderately-to-severely active UC (U-ACHIEVE trial). Methods Sparse blood samples were collected from subjects with UC who were enrolled in the U-ACHIEVE trial, which included Japanese and non-Japanese subjects. UPA plasma concentration vs. time after dose were summarised from the U-ACHIEVE trial. Additionally, data from U-ACHIEVE were pooled with data from UPA Phase 1 and other Phase 2 studies across different inflammatory diseases to characterise UPA population pharmacokinetics. The population pharmacokinetic model was used to estimate UPA plasma exposures from extended-release formulation (dose range 7.5 – 45mg QD) in 168 non-Japanese and 28 Japanese subjects with UC in U-ACHIEVE. Results UPA plasma exposures were approximately dose proportional over the evaluated dose range in Japanese subjects with UC. Observed dose-normalised plasma concentrations vs. time since the last dose (Figure 1) and dose-normalised model-estimated UPA exposures were comparable (within 25%) between Japanese and non-Japanese subjects with UC (Table 1). Conclusion UPA plasma exposures are similar between Japanese and non-Japanese subjects with UC. This is in agreement with prior assessments in healthy subjects and in subjects with RA which demonstrated comparable UPA exposures between Asian and Western subjects.


Author(s):  
Álvaro Corral Alaejos ◽  
Aránzazu Zarzuelo Castañeda ◽  
Silvia Jiménez Cabrera ◽  
Fermín Sánchez‐Guijo ◽  
María José Otero ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Qi Wang ◽  
Todd M. Cooper ◽  
Michael J. Absalon ◽  
E. Anders Kolb ◽  
Grygoriy Vasilinin ◽  
...  

CPX-351 (Vyxeos®; daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome for injection), a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine at a 1:5 synergistic ratio, is approved by the US FDA and EMA for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. Recently, CPX-351 was used in pediatric patients (pts) with relapsed AML (JCO 2020, ASH 2019, ASH 2018). A population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of plasma concentrations of cytarabine and daunorubicin following IV administration of CPX-351 was performed to assess sources of variability in PK and to determine if age-based dose adjustments may be warranted, particularly in pediatric pts. The PK population consisted of 250 pts with advanced hematologic malignancies from 7 studies and included 46 (18%) pediatric pts (1-17 y) and 204 (82%) adults (≥18 y). The population included 148 (59%) males, mainly of white origin (82%). Nonlinear mixed-effect modeling was performed using NONMEM®. Model evaluation and selection were assessed using a standard model discrimination process that included statistical criteria (eg, objective function value) and pertinent graphical representations of goodness-of-fit. Separate PK models were developed for cytarabine and daunorubicin; intrinsic and extrinsic factors were evaluated as covariates. The intrinsic factors included body weight, body mass index, age, sex, race, white blood cell count, and markers of renal function (creatinine clearance, serum creatinine) and hepatic function (bilirubin, aspartate and alanine aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase). The extrinsic factors included study type (adult vs pediatric/young adult) and formulation (frozen vs lyophilized). Based on previous population PK models developed for adults, the PK models for cytarabine and daunorubicin used 2-compartment structural models, with drug input into the central compartment, first-order distribution between the central and peripheral compartments, and first-order elimination from the central compartment. Two-compartment structural models with body surface area (BSA) as an allometric scalar provided minimum bias in estimates of systemic clearance (CL) and volume of distribution for the central compartment (Vc). Based on the final population PK models, the estimates of CL and Vc in adults were 0.101 L/h and 4.76 L, respectively, for cytarabine and 0.140 L/h and 4.04 L for daunorubicin. The population estimates of CL and Vc for cytarabine in children, adolescents, and young adults (<22 y) were 0.073 L/h and 3.91 L, respectively, for cytarabine and 0.093 L/h and 3.28 L for daunorubicin. The population PK models included an allometric component that accounted for differences in BSA. The exponent for the effect of BSA on CL was 0.948 and 0.876 for cytarabine and daunorubicin, respectively, suggesting a faster clearance in pts with higher BSA. These differences in CL are expected to be offset by BSA-based dosing of CPX-351. Bilirubin and formulation (frozen) remained statistically significant covariates on the CL of daunorubicin. All tested covariates were eventually excluded from the population PK models, except BSA, bilirubin, study type, and formulation, which have a small effect on PK and are not expected to result in detectable changes in clinical safety or efficacy. Age was evaluated both as a continuous and categorical variable (1-5, 6-11, and 12-17 y) and was not a significant covariate for cytarabine and daunorubicin CL and Vc. Study type was identified as a significant covariate for CL and Vc for cytarabine and daunorubicin, which was possibly due to a change in analytical site for pediatric studies. Mean AUC0-48 values of cytarabine in pts aged 1-5, 6-11, and 12-17 y (135 U/m2) were similar (2767, 2783, and 2806 μg·h/mL, respectively) and approximately 40% higher than that observed in pts ≥18 y (100 U/m2, 1928 μg·h/mL), proportional to the 35% higher dose in pediatric pts. Mean AUC0-48 values of daunorubicin in pts aged 1-5, 6-11, and 12-17 y (135 U/m2) were similar (967, 896, and 982 μg·h/mL, respectively) and approximately 40% higher than that observed in pts ≥18 y (100 U/m2, 615 μg·h/mL), proportional to the 35% higher dose in pediatric pts. The results of this population PK analysis indicated exposures to CPX-351 in pediatric pts were not affected by age and were similar to those in adults when administered at the same BSA-normalized dose. Disclosures Wang: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Cooper:Celgene: Other: Spouse was an employee of Celgene (through August 2019). Absalon:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Yes, in this study, CPX-351 was also evaluated in pediatric AML


2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 406-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manon Tauzin ◽  
Jean-Marc Tréluyer ◽  
Rima Nabbout ◽  
Thierry Billette de Villemeur ◽  
Isabelle Desguerre ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc J. Coppens ◽  
Douglas J. Eleveld ◽  
Johannes H. Proost ◽  
Luc A. M. Marks ◽  
Jan F. P. Van Bocxlaer ◽  
...  

Background To study propofol pharmacodynamics in a clinical setting a pharmacokinetic model must be used to predict drug plasma concentrations. Some investigators use a population pharmacokinetic model from existing literature and minimize the pharmacodynamic objective function. The purpose of the study was to determine whether this method selects the best-performing pharmacokinetic model in a set and provides accurate estimates of pharmacodynamic parameters in models for bispectral index in children after propofol administration. Methods Twenty-eight children classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 who were given general anesthesia for dental treatment were studied. Anesthesia was given using target-controlled infusion of propofol based on the Kataria model. Propofol target plasma concentration was 7 μg/ml for 15 min, followed by 1 μg/ml for 15 min or until signs of awakening, followed by 5 μg/ml for 15 min. Venous blood samples were taken 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 min after each change in target. A classic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was estimated, and the methodology of other studies was duplicated using pharmacokinetic models from the literature and (re-)estimating the pharmacodynamic models. Results There is no clear relationship between pharmacokinetic precision and the pharmacodynamic objective function. Low pharmacodynamic objective function values are not associated with accurate estimation of the pharmacodynamic parameters when the pharmacokinetic model is taken from other sources. Conclusion Minimization of the pharmacodynamic objective function does not select the most accurate pharmacokinetic model. Using population pharmacokinetic models from the literature instead of the 'true' pharmacokinetic model can lead to better predictions of bispectral index while incorrectly estimating the pharmacodynamic parameters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document