scholarly journals Precursor Intensity-Based Label-Free Quantification Software Tools for Proteomic and Multi-Omic Analysis within the Galaxy Platform

Proteomes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Subina Mehta ◽  
Caleb W. Easterly ◽  
Ray Sajulga ◽  
Robert J. Millikin ◽  
Andrea Argentini ◽  
...  

For mass spectrometry-based peptide and protein quantification, label-free quantification (LFQ) based on precursor mass peak (MS1) intensities is considered reliable due to its dynamic range, reproducibility, and accuracy. LFQ enables peptide-level quantitation, which is useful in proteomics (analyzing peptides carrying post-translational modifications) and multi-omics studies such as metaproteomics (analyzing taxon-specific microbial peptides) and proteogenomics (analyzing non-canonical sequences). Bioinformatics workflows accessible via the Galaxy platform have proven useful for analysis of such complex multi-omic studies. However, workflows within the Galaxy platform have lacked well-tested LFQ tools. In this study, we have evaluated moFF and FlashLFQ, two open-source LFQ tools, and implemented them within the Galaxy platform to offer access and use via established workflows. Through rigorous testing and communication with the tool developers, we have optimized the performance of each tool. Software features evaluated include: (a) match-between-runs (MBR); (b) using multiple file-formats as input for improved quantification; (c) use of containers and/or conda packages; (d) parameters needed for analyzing large datasets; and (e) optimization and validation of software performance. This work establishes a process for software implementation, optimization, and validation, and offers access to two robust software tools for LFQ-based analysis within the Galaxy platform.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subina Mehta ◽  
Caleb Easterly ◽  
Ray Sajulga ◽  
Robert J. Millikin ◽  
Andrea Argentini ◽  
...  

AbstractFor mass spectrometry-based peptide and protein quantification, label-free quantification (LFQ) based on precursor mass peak (MS1) intensities is considered reliable due to its dynamic range, reproducibility, and accuracy. In LFQ workflows, protein abundance changes are inferred from peptide-level information, including microbial peptides (for metaproteomics) and peptides carrying post-translational modifications (for proteomics) and/or variant sequences (for proteogenomics). Multi-omics studies (such as proteogenomics and metaproteomics) rely on peptide detection and quantification to identify and quantify peptides that map to unique proteoforms and metaproteins. The Galaxy for proteomics (Galaxy-P) platform has proven useful for the development of accessible workflows to identify proteins in these complex multi-omic studies. However, proteomics workflows within the Galaxy platform have lacked well-tested label-free quantification tools.In this study, our main goals were to evaluate two recently published open-source LFQ tools and to implement them within the Galaxy platform, enabling their easy integration with established workflows. These two tools, moFF and FlashLFQ, were selected based on their described peptide quantification capabilities and amenability to Galaxy implementation. Through rigorous testing and communication with the tools’ developers, we gained insights into the software features necessary for maximizing the performance of each tool. Software features evaluated included: a) match-between-runs (MBR); b) using both Thermo .raw and HUPO standards .mzML file formats as input for improved quantification; c) use of containers and/or conda packages; d) parameters needed for analyzing large input datasets; and e) optimization and validation of software performance. This work 1) establishes a process for software implementation, optimization and validation within Galaxy; and 2) makes powerful new tools for LFQ available which should prove highly useful for a variety of proteomics and multi-omics applications employing the Galaxy platform.


PROTEOMICS ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (18) ◽  
pp. 3140-3151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Kuharev ◽  
Pedro Navarro ◽  
Ute Distler ◽  
Olaf Jahn ◽  
Stefan Tenzer

2020 ◽  
Vol 229 ◽  
pp. 103962
Author(s):  
Hugo Miguel Santos ◽  
Carlos Lodeiro ◽  
José Luis Capelo

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Deng ◽  
Zhenye Li ◽  
Chao Pan ◽  
Huilong Duan

Study of complex proteome brings forward higher request for the quantification method using mass spectrometry technology. In this paper, we present a mass spectrometry label-free quantification tool for complex proteomes, called freeQuant, which integrated quantification with functional analysis effectively. freeQuant consists of two well-integrated modules: label-free quantification and functional analysis with biomedical knowledge. freeQuant supports label-free quantitative analysis which makes full use of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) spectral count, protein sequence length, shared peptides, and ion intensity. It adopts spectral count for quantitative analysis and builds a new method for shared peptides to accurately evaluate abundance of isoforms. For proteins with low abundance, MS/MS total ion count coupled with spectral count is included to ensure accurate protein quantification. Furthermore, freeQuant supports the large-scale functional annotations for complex proteomes. Mitochondrial proteomes from the mouse heart, the mouse liver, and the human heart were used to evaluate the usability and performance of freeQuant. The evaluation showed that the quantitative algorithms implemented in freeQuant can improve accuracy of quantification with better dynamic range.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1477-1485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Griss ◽  
Florian Stanek ◽  
Otto Hudecz ◽  
Gerhard Dürnberger ◽  
Yasset Perez-Riverol ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 3833-3842
Author(s):  
SASIKARN KOMKLEOW ◽  
CHURAT WEERAPHAN ◽  
DARANEE CHOKCHAICHAMNANKIT ◽  
PAPADA CHAISURIYA ◽  
CHRIS VERATHAMJAMRAS ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (21) ◽  
pp. 12670-12677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Fornasaro ◽  
Alois Bonifacio ◽  
Elena Marangon ◽  
Mauro Buzzo ◽  
Giuseppe Toffoli ◽  
...  

Lab on a Chip ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsi-Hsuan Hsu ◽  
Meng-Hua Yen ◽  
Wei-Yu Liao ◽  
Ji-Yen Cheng ◽  
Chau-Hwang Lee

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1281-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan K. Van Riper ◽  
Ebbing P. de Jong ◽  
LeeAnn Higgins ◽  
John V. Carlis ◽  
Timothy J. Griffin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document