scholarly journals An Improved Digital Elevation Model of the Lunar Mons Rümker Region Based on Multisource Altimeter Data

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Li ◽  
Chang Zhu ◽  
Weifeng Hao ◽  
Jianguo Yan ◽  
Mao Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Digital Elevation Model ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Horizontal Resolution ◽  
Altimeter Data ◽  
Laser Altimeter ◽  
Lunar Landing ◽  
Data Processing Method ◽  
Digital Elevation ◽  
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter ◽  
Elevation Model

Mons Rümker is the primary candidate region for the lunar landing mission of Chang’E-5. We propose a data processing method that combines multisource altimeter data and we developed an improved digital elevation model (DEM) of the Mons Rümker region with a horizontal resolution of 256 pixels per degree. The lunar orbiter laser altimeter (LOLA) onboard the lunar reconnaissance orbiter (LRO) acquired 884 valid orbital benchmark data with a high precision. A special crossover adjustment of 156 orbital profiles from the Chang’E-1 laser altimeter (LAM) and 149 orbital profiles from the SELenological and ENgineering Explorer (SELENE) laser altimeter (LALT) was applied. The radial residual root mean square (RMS) of the LAM was reduced from 154.83 ± 43.60 m to 14.29 ± 27.84 m and that of the LALT was decreased from 3.50 ± 5.0 m to 2.75 ± 4.4 m. We used the adjusted LAM and LALT data to fill the LOLA gaps and created the merged LOLA + LAM and LOLA + LALT DEMs. The merged LOLA + LAM DEM showed distortions because of the horizontal geolocation errors in the LAM data. The merged LOLA + LALT DEM was closer to the ground truth than the LOLA-only DEM when validated with the images of the LRO camera (LROC).

scholarly journals A new 1 km digital elevation model of Antarctica derived from combined radar and laser data – Part 2: Validation and error estimates

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Griggs ◽  
J. L. Bamber
Keyword(s):  
Digital Elevation Model ◽  
Satellite Data ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Model ◽  
Altimeter Data ◽  
Laser Altimeter ◽  
Digital Elevation ◽  
Surface Slopes ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Elevation Model

Abstract. We have developed a new digital elevation model (DEM) of Antarctica from a combination of satellite radar and laser altimeter data. Here, we assess the accuracy of the DEM by comparison with airborne altimeter data from four campaigns covering a wide range of surface slopes and ice sheet regions. Root mean squared (RMS) differences varied from 4.75 m, when compared to a densely gridded airborne dataset over the Siple Coast region of West Antarctica to 33.78 m when compared to a more limited dataset over the Antarctic Peninsula where surface slopes are high and the across track spacing of the satellite data is relatively large. The airborne data sets were employed to produce an error map for the DEM by developing a multiple linear regression model based on the variables known to influence errors in the DEM. Errors were found to correlate highly with surface slope, roughness and density of satellite data points. Errors ranged from typically ~1 m over the ice shelves to between about 2 and 6 m for the majority of the grounded ice sheet. In the steeply sloping margins, along the Peninsula and mountain ranges the estimated error is several tens of metres. Less than 2% of the area covered by the satellite data had an estimated random error greater than 20 m.

scholarly journals A new 1 km digital elevation model of Antarctica derived from combined radar and laser data – Part 2: Validation and error estimates

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 843-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Griggs ◽  
J. L. Bamber
Keyword(s):  
Digital Elevation Model ◽  
Satellite Data ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Model ◽  
Altimeter Data ◽  
Laser Altimeter ◽  
Digital Elevation ◽  
Surface Slopes ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Elevation Model

Abstract. We have developed a new digital elevation model (DEM) of Antarctica from a combination of satellite radar and laser altimeter data. Here, we assess the accuracy of the DEM by comparison with airborne altimeter data from four campaigns covering a wide range of surface slopes and ice sheet regions. RMS differences varied from 4.84 m, when compared to a densely gridded airborne dataset over the Siple Coast region of West Antarctica to 29.28 m when compared to a more limited dataset over the Antarctic Peninsula where surface slopes are high and the across track spacing of the satellite data is relatively large. The airborne data sets were employed to produce an error map for the DEM by developing a multiple linear regression model based on the variables known to influence errors in the DEM. Errors were found to correlate highly with surface slope, roughness and density of satellite data points. Errors ranged from typically ~1 m over the ice shelves to between about 4 and 10 m for the majority of the grounded ice sheet. In the steeply sloping margins, along the Peninsula and mountain ranges the estimated error is several tens of metres. Slightly less than 7% of the area covered by the satellite data had an estimated random error greater than 20 m.

scholarly journals Measurement of ice-sheet topography using satellite-radar interferometry

1996 ◽  
Vol 42 (140) ◽  
pp. 10-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Joughin ◽  
Dale Winebrenner ◽  
Mark Fahnestock ◽  
Ron Kwok ◽  
William Krabill
Keyword(s):  
Ice Sheets ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Surface Displacement ◽  
Horizontal Resolution ◽  
Radar Interferometry ◽  
Altimeter Data ◽  
Laser Altimeter ◽  
Digital Elevation ◽  
Satellite Radar ◽  
Ice Sheet Topography

AbstractDetailed digital elevation models (DEMs) do not exist for much of the Greenland and Antartic ice sheets. Radar altimetry is at present the primary, in many cases the only, source of topographic data over the ice sheets, but the horizontal resolution of such data is coarse. Satellite-radar interferometry uses the phase difference between pairs of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images to measure both ice-sheet topography and surface displacement. We have applied this technique using ERS-1 SAR data to make detailed (i.e. 80 m horizontal resolution) maps of surface topography in a 100 km by 300 km strip in West Greenland, extending northward from just above Jakobshavns Isbræ. Comparison with а 76 km long line of airborne laser-altimeter data shows that We have achieved a relative accuracy of 2.5 m along the profile. These observations provide a detailed view of dynamically Supported topography near the margin of an ice sheet. In the final section We compare our estimate of topography with phase contours due to motion, and confirm our earlier analysis concerning vertical ice-sheet motion and complexity in ERS-1 SAR interferograms.

scholarly journals Improving maps of ice-sheet surface elevation change using combined laser altimeter and stereoscopic elevation model data

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (215) ◽  
pp. 524-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.F. Levinsen ◽  
I.M. Howat ◽  
C.C. Tscherning
Keyword(s):  
Point Clouds ◽  
Altimeter Data ◽  
Laser Altimeter ◽  
Registration Errors ◽  
Digital Elevation ◽  
Surface Elevation Change ◽  
Laser Altimeters ◽  
Elevation Changes ◽  
Elevation Model ◽  
Spot 5

AbstractWe combine the complementary characteristics of laser altimeter data and stereoscopic digital elevation models (DEMs) to construct high-resolution (∼100 m) maps of surface elevations and elevation changes over rapidly changing outlet glaciers in Greenland. Measurements from spaceborne and airborne laser altimeters have relatively low errors but are spatially limited to the ground tracks, while DEMs have larger errors but provide spatially continuous surfaces. The principle of our method is to fit the DEM surface to the altimeter point clouds in time and space to minimize the DEM errors and use that surface to extrapolate elevations away from altimeter flight lines. This reduces the DEM registration errors and fills the gap between the altimeter paths. We use data from ICESat and ATM as well as SPOT 5 DEMs from 2007 and 2008 and apply them to the outlet glaciers Jakobshavn Isbræ (JI) and Kangerdlugssuaq (KL). We find that the main trunks of JI and KL lowered at rates of 30–35 and 7–20 m a−1,respectively. The rates decreased inland. The corresponding errors were 0.3–5.2 m a−1for JI and 0.3–5.1 m a−1for KL, with errors increasing proportionally with distance from the altimeter paths.

scholarly journals VEGETATION COVER MAPPING BASED ON REMOTE SENSING AND DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL DATA

2016 ◽  
Vol XLI-B8 ◽  
pp. 699-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Korets ◽  
V. A. Ryzhkova ◽  
I. V. Danilova ◽  
A. S. Prokushkin
Keyword(s):  
Digital Elevation Model ◽  
Boreal Forests ◽  
Forest Cover ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Test Site ◽  
Ground Truth Data ◽  
Digital Elevation ◽  
Forest Cover Mapping ◽  
Elevation Model ◽  
Digital Elevation Model Data

An algorithm of forest cover mapping based on combined GIS-based analysis of multi-band satellite imagery, digital elevation model, and ground truth data was developed. Using the classification principles and an approach of Russian forest scientist Kolesnikov, maps of forest types and forest growing conditions (FGC) were build. The first map is based on RS-composite classification, while the second map is constructed on the basis of DEM-composite classification. The spatial combination of this two layers were also used for extrapolation and mapping of ecosystem carbon stock values (kgC/m<sup>2</sup>). The proposed approach was applied for the test site area (~3600 km<sup>2</sup>), located in the Northern Siberia boreal forests of Evenkia near Tura settlement.

scholarly journals A new digital elevation model of Antarctica derived from CryoSat-2 altimetry

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1551-1562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Slater ◽  
Andrew Shepherd ◽  
Malcolm McMillan ◽  
Alan Muir ◽  
Lin Gilbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Digital Elevation Model ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Grid Cells ◽  
Radar Altimeter ◽  
Laser Altimeter ◽  
Ice Shelves ◽  
Digital Elevation ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Satellite Radar ◽  
Elevation Model

Abstract. We present a new digital elevation model (DEM) of the Antarctic ice sheet and ice shelves based on 2.5×108 observations recorded by the CryoSat-2 satellite radar altimeter between July 2010 and July 2016. The DEM is formed from spatio-temporal fits to elevation measurements accumulated within 1, 2, and 5 km grid cells, and is posted at the modal resolution of 1 km. Altogether, 94 % of the grounded ice sheet and 98 % of the floating ice shelves are observed, and the remaining grid cells north of 88∘ S are interpolated using ordinary kriging. The median and root mean square difference between the DEM and 2.3×107 airborne laser altimeter measurements acquired during NASA Operation IceBridge campaigns are −0.30 and 13.50 m, respectively. The DEM uncertainty rises in regions of high slope, especially where elevation measurements were acquired in low-resolution mode; taking this into account, we estimate the average accuracy to be 9.5 m – a value that is comparable to or better than that of other models derived from satellite radar and laser altimetry.

Assessment of ASTER global digital elevation model data for Arctic research

Polar Record ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. G. Rees
Keyword(s):  
Digital Elevation Model ◽  
Thermal Emission ◽  
Digital Elevation Models ◽  
Sampling Interval ◽  
Horizontal Resolution ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Semivariogram Analysis ◽  
Digital Elevation ◽  
Elevation Data ◽  
Elevation Model

ABSTRACTA new source of digital elevation data, the advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer (ASTER) global digital elevation model (GDEM), has been freely available since 2009. It provides enormously greater coverage of the Arctic than previous satellite derived ‘global’ digital elevation models, extending to a latitude of 83 °N in contrast to 60 °N. The GDEM is described as a preliminary, research grade product. This paper investigates its accuracy in a number of specifically Arctic landscapes, including ice and snow, boreal forest, tundra and unvegetated terrain, using test sites in Svalbard, Iceland, Norway and Russia. Semivariogram analysis is used to characterise the magnitude and spatial correlation of errors in the GDEM products from the test sites. The analysis suggests that the horizontal resolution of the GDEM data is around 130 m, somewhat coarser than the sampling interval of 1 second of latitude and longitude. The vertical accuracy is variable, and the factors influencing it have not been systematically explored. However, it appears that the likely accuracy can be estimated from ‘stacking number’ data supplied with the elevation data. The stacking number is the number of independent digital elevation models averaged to generate the supplied product. Provided that this number is greater than around 6 the data have an rms accuracy of typically 5–10 m.

scholarly journals A new Digital Elevation Model of Antarctica derived from CryoSat-2 altimetry

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Slater ◽  
Andrew Shepherd ◽  
Malcolm McMillan ◽  
Alan Muir ◽  
Lin Gilbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Digital Elevation Model ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Grid Cells ◽  
Radar Altimeter ◽  
Laser Altimeter ◽  
Ice Shelves ◽  
Digital Elevation ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Satellite Radar ◽  
Elevation Model

Abstract. We present a new Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of the Antarctic ice sheet and ice shelves based on 2.5 × 108 observations recorded by the CryoSat-2 satellite radar altimeter between July 2010 and July 2016. The DEM is formed from spatio-temporal fits to elevation measurements accumulated within 1, 2 and 5 km grid cells, and is posted at the modal resolution of 1 km. Altogether, 94 % of the grounded ice sheet and 98 % of the floating ice shelves are observed, and the remaining grid cells North of 88° S are interpolated using ordinary kriging. The median and root mean square difference between the DEM and 2.3 × 107 airborne laser altimeter measurements acquired during NASA Operation IceBridge campaigns are −0.30 m and 13.50 m, respectively. The DEM uncertainty rises in regions of high slope – especially where elevation measurements were acquired in Low Resolution Mode – and, taking this into account, we estimate the average accuracy to be 9.5 m – a value that is comparable to or better than that of other models derived from satellite radar and laser altimetry.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document