scholarly journals The Effects of an Eight over Cricket Bowling Spell upon Pace Bowling Biomechanics and Performance within Different Delivery Lengths

Sports ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 200
Author(s):  
Samuel J. Callaghan ◽  
Robert G. Lockie ◽  
Warren A. Andrews ◽  
Walter Yu ◽  
Robert F. Chipchase ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Body ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Load Monitoring ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Run Up ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Cricket Bowling ◽  
Shoulder Kinematics ◽  
Release Speed

Pace bowlers must often perform extended bowling spells with maximal ball release speed (BRS) while targeting different delivery lengths when playing a multi-day match. This study investigated the effect of an eight over spell upon pace bowling biomechanics and performance at different delivery lengths. Nine male bowlers (age = 18.8 ± 1.7 years) completed an eight over spell, while targeting different lengths (short: 7–10 m, good: 4–7 m, full: 0–4 m from the batter’s stumps, respectively) in a randomized order. Trunk, knee and shoulder kinematics and ground reaction forces at front foot contact (FFC), as well as run-up velocity and BRS were measured. Paired sample t-tests (p ≤ 0.01), Hedges’ g effect sizes, and statistical parametrical mapping were used to assess differences between mean variables from the first and last three overs. No significant differences (p = 0.05–0.98) were found in any discrete or continuous variables, with the magnitude of difference being trivial-to-medium (g = 0.00–0.73) across all variables. Results suggest pace bowlers sustain BRS through a single eight over spell while tolerating the repeatedly high whole-body biomechanical loads as suggested by maintaining the kinematics or technique at the assessed joints during FFC. Practically, the findings are advantageous for bowling performance and support current bowling load monitoring practices.

scholarly journals Physical and Performance Characteristics Related to Unintentional Musculoskeletal Injury in Special Forces Operators: A Prospective Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (12) ◽  
pp. 1153-1160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas R. Heebner ◽  
John P. Abt ◽  
Mita Lovalekar ◽  
Kim Beals ◽  
Timothy C. Sell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Laboratory Testing ◽  
Musculoskeletal Injury ◽  
Knee Extension ◽  
Musculoskeletal Injuries ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Special Forces ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
And Performance

Context:  Seventy-seven percent of musculoskeletal injuries sustained by United States Army Special Forces Operators are preventable. Identification of predictive characteristics will promote the development of screening methods to augment injury-prevention programs. Objective:  To determine physical and performance characteristics that predict musculoskeletal injuries. Setting:  Clinical laboratory. Patients or Other Participants:  A total of 95 Operators (age = 32.7 ± 5.1 years, height = 179.8 ± 6.9 cm, mass = 89.9 ± 12.7 kg). Main Outcome Measure(s):  Laboratory testing consisted of body composition, aerobic and anaerobic capacity, upper and lower body strength and flexibility, balance, and biomechanical evaluation. Injury data were captured for 12 months after laboratory testing. Injury frequencies, cross-tabulations, and relative risks (RRs) were calculated to evaluate the relationships between physical characteristics and injury proportions. Between-groups differences (injured versus uninjured) were assessed using appropriate t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests. Results:  Less shoulder-retraction strength (RR = 1.741 [95% confidence interval = 1.003, 3.021]), knee-extension strength (RR = 2.029 [95% confidence interval = 1.011, 4.075]), and a smaller trunk extension : flexion ratio (RR = 0.533 [95% confidence interval = 0.341, 0.831]) were significant risk factors for injury. Group comparisons showed less trunk strength (extension: P = .036, flexion: P = .048) and smaller right vertical ground reaction forces during landing (P = .025) in injured Operators. Knee strength, aerobic capacity, and body mass index were less in the subgroup of spine-injured versus uninjured Operators (P values = .013−.036). Conclusions:  Knee-extension and shoulder-retraction strength were risk factors for musculoskeletal injury in Operators. Less trunk-flexion and -extension strength, higher body mass index, lower aerobic capacity, and increased ground reaction forces during landing were characteristics that may also contribute to musculoskeletal injury. Having 2 or more risk factors resulted in a greater injury proportion (χ2 = 13.512, P = .015); however, more research is needed. Athletic trainers working in the military or similar high-demand settings can use these data to augment screening and injury-prevention protocols.

Manipulating Trunk and Whole Body Posture during Running Influences Ground Reaction Forces

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 1073
Author(s):  
Madeline Simon ◽  
Angela Sondalle ◽  
Matthew Ferlindes ◽  
David M. Bazett-Jones
Keyword(s):  
Body Posture ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Reaction Forces

scholarly journals Effects of Cooling on Ankle Muscle Strength, Electromyography, and Gait Ground Reaction Forces

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amitava Halder ◽  
Chuansi Gao ◽  
Michael Miller
Keyword(s):  
Cold Water ◽  
Isometric Force ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Muscle Performance ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Local Cooling ◽  
Ankle Muscle ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
And Performance

The effects of cooling on neuromuscular function and performance during gait are not fully examined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of local cooling for 20 min in cold water at 10°C in a climate chamber also at 10°C on maximal isometric force and electromyographic (EMG) activity of the lower leg muscles. Gait ground reaction forces (GRFs) were also assessed. Sixteen healthy university students participated in the within subject design experimental study. Isometric forces of the tibialis anterior (TA) and the gastrocnemius medialis (GM) were measured using a handheld dynamometer and the EMG was recorded using surface electrodes. Ground reaction forces during gait and the required coefficient of friction (RCOF) were recorded using a force plate. There was a significantly reduced isometric maximum force in the TA muscle (P<0.001) after cooling. The mean EMG amplitude of GM muscle was increased after cooling (P<0.003), indicating that fatigue was induced. We found no significant changes in the gait GRFs and RCOF on dry and level surface. These findings may indicate that local moderate cooling 20 min of 10°C cold water, may influence maximal muscle performance without affecting activities at sub-maximal effort.

scholarly journals A data set with kinematic and ground reaction forces of human balance

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damiana A dos Santos ◽  
Claudiane A Fukuchi ◽  
Reginaldo K Fukuchi ◽  
Marcos Duarte
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Kinematic Model ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Force Platform ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Public Data ◽  
Reaction Forces

This article describes a public data set with the three-dimensional kinematics of the whole body and the ground reaction forces (with a dual force platform setup) of subjects standing still for 60 s in different conditions, in which the vision and the standing surface were manipulated. Twenty-seven young subjects and 22 old subjects were evaluated. The data set comprises a file with metadata plus 1,813 files with the ground reaction force (GRF) and kinematics data for the 49 subjects (three files for each of the 12 trials plus one file for each subject). The file with metadata has information about each subject’s sociocultural, demographic, and health characteristics. The files with the GRF have the data from each force platform and from the resultant GRF (including the center of pressure data). The files with the kinematics have the three-dimensional position of the 42 markers used for the kinematic model of the whole body and the 73 calculated angles. In this text, we illustrate how to access, analyze, and visualize the data set. All the data is available at Figshare (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4525082 ), and a companion Jupyter Notebook (available at https://github.com/demotu/datasets ) presents the programming code to generate analyses and other examples.

scholarly journals A data set with kinematic and ground reaction forces of human balance

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damiana A dos Santos ◽  
Claudiane A Fukuchi ◽  
Reginaldo K Fukuchi ◽  
Marcos Duarte
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Kinematic Model ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Force Platform ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Public Data ◽  
Reaction Forces

This article describes a public data set with the three-dimensional kinematics of the whole body and the ground reaction forces (with a dual force platform setup) of subjects standing still for 60 s in different conditions, in which the vision and the standing surface were manipulated. Twenty-seven young subjects and 22 old subjects were evaluated. The data set comprises a file with metadata plus 1,813 files with the ground reaction force (GRF) and kinematics data for the 49 subjects (three files for each of the 12 trials plus one file for each subject). The file with metadata has information about each subject’s sociocultural, demographic, and health characteristics. The files with the GRF have the data from each force platform and from the resultant GRF (including the center of pressure data). The files with the kinematics have the three-dimensional position of the 42 markers used for the kinematic model of the whole body and the 73 calculated angles. In this text, we illustrate how to access, analyze, and visualize the data set. All the data is available at Figshare (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4525082 ), and a companion Jupyter Notebook (available at https://github.com/demotu/datasets ) presents the programming code to generate analyses and other examples.

scholarly journals Whole-body biomechanical load in running-based sports: The validity of estimating ground reaction forces from segmental accelerations

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 716-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasper Verheul ◽  
Warren Gregson ◽  
Paulo Lisboa ◽  
Jos Vanrenterghem ◽  
Mark A. Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Whole Body ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Reaction Forces

The effects of strength training upon front foot contact ground reaction forces and ball release speed among high-level cricket pace bowlers

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Samuel J. Callaghan ◽  
Robert G. Lockie ◽  
Jamie Tallent ◽  
Robert F. Chipchase ◽  
Warren A. Andrews ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Strength Training ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Ball Release ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
High Level ◽  
Release Speed

scholarly journals Motor Strategies Used by Rats Spinalized at Birth to Maintain Stance in Response to Imposed Perturbations

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 2663-2675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon F. Giszter ◽  
Michelle R. Davies ◽  
Virginia Graziani
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Principal Axis ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Quiet Stance ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Pattern Generators ◽  
Motor Strategies ◽  
Intact Rats

Some rats spinalized P1/P2 achieve autonomous weight-supported locomotion and quiet stance as adults. We used force platforms and robot-applied perturbations to test such spinalized rats ( n = 6) that exhibited both weight-supporting locomotion and stance, and also normal rats ( n = 8). Ground reaction forces in individual limbs and the animals' center of pressure were examined. In normal rats, both forelimbs and hindlimbs participated actively to control horizontal components of ground reaction forces. Rostral perturbations increased forelimb ground reaction forces and caudal perturbations increased hindlimb ground reaction forces. Operate rats carried 60% body weight on the forelimbs and had a more rostral center of pressure placement. The pattern in normal rats was to carry significantly more weight on the hindlimbs in quiet stance (roughly 60%). The strategy of operate rats to compensate for perturbations was entirely in forelimbs; as a result, the hindlimbs were largely isolated from the perturbation. Stiffness magnitude of the whole body was measured: its magnitude was hourglass shaped, with the principal axis oriented rostrocaudally. Operate rats were significantly less stiff—only 60–75% of normal rats' stiffness. The injured rats adopt a stance strategy that isolates the hindlimbs from perturbation and may thus prevent hindlimb loadings. Such loadings could initiate reflex stepping, which we observed. This might activate lumbar pattern generators used in their locomotion. Adult spinalized rats never achieve independent hindlimb weight-supported stance. The stance strategy of the P1 spinalized rats differed strongly from the behavior of intact rats and may be difficult for rats spinalized as adults to master.

scholarly journals Joint kinematics and kinetics of overground accelerated running versus running on an accelerated treadmill

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (84) ◽  
pp. 20130222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ine Van Caekenberghe ◽  
Veerle Segers ◽  
Peter Aerts ◽  
Patrick Willems ◽  
Dirk De Clercq
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Initial Contact ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Joint Moments ◽  
Joint Power ◽  
Joint Kinetics ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Kinetics Of

Literature shows that running on an accelerated motorized treadmill is mechanically different from accelerated running overground. Overground, the subject has to enlarge the net anterior–posterior force impulse proportional to acceleration in order to overcome linear whole body inertia, whereas on a treadmill, this force impulse remains zero, regardless of belt acceleration. Therefore, it can be expected that changes in kinematics and joint kinetics of the human body also are proportional to acceleration overground, whereas no changes according to belt acceleration are expected on a treadmill. This study documents kinematics and joint kinetics of accelerated running overground and running on an accelerated motorized treadmill belt for 10 young healthy subjects. When accelerating overground, ground reaction forces are characterized by less braking and more propulsion, generating a more forward-oriented ground reaction force vector and a more forwardly inclined body compared with steady-state running. This change in body orientation as such is partly responsible for the changed force direction. Besides this, more pronounced hip and knee flexion at initial contact, a larger hip extension velocity, smaller knee flexion velocity and smaller initial plantarflexion velocity are associated with less braking. A larger knee extension and plantarflexion velocity result in larger propulsion. Altogether, during stance, joint moments are not significantly influenced by acceleration overground. Therefore, we suggest that the overall behaviour of the musculoskeletal system (in terms of kinematics and joint moments) during acceleration at a certain speed remains essentially identical to steady-state running at the same speed, yet acting in a different orientation. However, because acceleration implies extra mechanical work to increase the running speed, muscular effort done (in terms of power output) must be larger. This is confirmed by larger joint power generation at the level of the hip and lower power absorption at the knee as the result of subtle differences in joint velocity. On a treadmill, ground reaction forces are not influenced by acceleration and, compared with overground, virtually no kinesiological adaptations to an accelerating belt are observed. Consequently, adaptations to acceleration during running differ from treadmill to overground and should be studied in the condition of interest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document