scholarly journals FPGA Realization of the Parameter-Switching Method in the Chen Oscillator and Application in Image Transmission

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 923
Author(s):  
Vincent-Ademola Adeyemi ◽  
Jose-Cruz Nuñez-Perez ◽  
Yuma Sandoval Ibarra ◽  
Francisco-Javier Perez-Pinal ◽  
Esteban Tlelo-Cuautle

In this paper, the parameter-switching technique was applied to control chaos in the Chen oscillator and as a decryption mechanism in a secure transmission system, to transmit RGB and grayscale images. In the past few decades, considerable efforts have been put into the study of the stabilization of chaotic dynamical systems. Most of the well-known chaos control methods, such as Ott, Grebogi, and Yorke (OGY), Pyragas, and open-loop methods, force an unstable periodic orbit into a stable one while distorting the original attractor. On the other hand, the parameter-switching technique is an elegant method that can synthesize an already-existing stable orbit, thereby preserving the underlying attractor. Consequently, the main contributions of this work were the FPGA realizations of the parameter-switching method and a secure image transmission system using a synchronized master and slave topology. The results of the parameter-switching technique and synchronization were verified using phase plots and time series. The chaos-encrypted image from the image transmission system, verified using correlation, showed no relativity with the original image, while the recovery of the decrypted image has no loss of quality. The encryption and decryption system was symmetric, whereby the key was private. In this work, co-simulations were performed in Active-HDL with MATLAB/Simulink, while the target FPGA board was the Xilinx’s Artix-7 AC701.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Jianjun Hao ◽  
Luyao Liu ◽  
Wei Chen

Any signal transmitted over an air-to-ground channel is corrupted by fading, noise, and interference. In this paper, a Polar-coded 3D point cloud image transmission system with fading channel is modeled, and also the simulation is performed to verify its performance in terms of 3D point cloud image data transmission over Rician channel with Gaussian white noise and overlap of Gaussian white noise + periodic pulse jamming separately. The comparison of Polar-coded scheme with RS-coded scheme in the same scenario indicates that Polar-coded system gives far better performance against AWGN noise and fading than the RS-coded system does in the case of short block length. But RS-coded scheme shows better performance on antipulse jamming than that of Polar-coded scheme, while there is no interleaving between codewords.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. E5 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Zhou ◽  
Tsinsue Chen ◽  
S. Harrison Farber ◽  
Andrew G. Shetter ◽  
Francisco A. Ponce

OBJECTIVEThe field of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for epilepsy has grown tremendously since its inception in the 1970s and 1980s. The goal of this review is to identify and evaluate all studies published on the topic of open-loop DBS for epilepsy over the past decade (2008 to present).METHODSA PubMed search was conducted to identify all articles reporting clinical outcomes of open-loop DBS for the treatment of epilepsy published since January 1, 2008. The following composite search terms were used: (“epilepsy” [MeSH] OR “seizures” [MeSH] OR “kindling, neurologic” [MeSH] OR epilep* OR seizure* OR convuls*) AND (“deep brain stimulation” [MeSH] OR “deep brain stimulation” OR “DBS”) OR (“electric stimulation therapy” [MeSH] OR “electric stimulation therapy” OR “implantable neurostimulators” [MeSH]).RESULTSThe authors identified 41 studies that met the criteria for inclusion. The anterior nucleus of the thalamus, centromedian nucleus of the thalamus, and hippocampus were the most frequently evaluated targets. Among the 41 articles, 19 reported on stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus, 6 evaluated stimulation of the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus, and 9 evaluated stimulation of the hippocampus. The remaining 7 articles reported on the evaluation of alternative DBS targets, including the posterior hypothalamus, subthalamic nucleus, ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus, nucleus accumbens, caudal zone incerta, mammillothalamic tract, and fornix. The authors evaluated each study for overall epilepsy response rates as well as adverse events and other significant, nonepilepsy outcomes.CONCLUSIONSLevel I evidence supports the safety and efficacy of stimulating the anterior nucleus of the thalamus and the hippocampus for the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy. Level III and IV evidence supports stimulation of other targets for epilepsy. Ongoing research into the efficacy, adverse effects, and mechanisms of open-loop DBS continues to expand the knowledge supporting the use of these treatment modalities in patients with refractory epilepsy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document