scholarly journals Using UAV Visible Images to Estimate the Soil Moisture of Steppe

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2334
Author(s):  
Fengshuai Lu ◽  
Yi Sun ◽  
Fujiang Hou

Although unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been utilized in many aspects of steppe management, they have not been commonly used to monitor the soil moisture of steppes. To explore the technology of detecting soil moisture by UAV in a typical steppe, we conducted a watered test in the Loess Plateau of China, quantitatively revealing the relationship between the surface soil moisture and the visible images captured using an UAV. The results showed that the surface soil moisture was significantly correlated with the brightness of UAV visible images, and the surface soil moisture could be estimated based on the brightness of the visible images of the UAV combined with vegetation coverage. This study addresses the problem of soil moisture measurement in flat regions of arid and semi-arid steppes at the mesoscale, and contributes to the popularization of the use of UAVs in steppe ecological research.

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ichirow Kaihotsu ◽  
Jun Asanuma ◽  
Kentaro Aida ◽  
Dambaravjaa Oyunbaatar

Abstract This study evaluated the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) L2 soil moisture product (ver. 3) using in situ hydrological observational data, acquired over 7 years (2012–2018), from a 50 × 50 km flat area of the Mongolian Plateau covered with bare soil, pasture and shrubs. Although AMSR2 slightly underestimated soil moisture content at 3-cm depth, satisfactory timing was observed in both the response patterns and the in situ soil moisture data, and the differences between these factors were not large. In terms of the relationship between AMSR2 soil moisture from descending orbits and in situ measured soil moisture at 3-cm depth, the values of the RMSE (m3/m3) and the bias (m3/m3) varied from 0.028 to 0.063 and from 0.011 to − 0.001 m3/m3, respectively. The values of the RMSE and bias depended on rainfall condition. The mean value of the RMSE for the 7-year period was 0.042 m3/m3, i.e., lower than the target accuracy 0.050 m3/m3. The validation results for descending orbits were found slightly better than for ascending orbits. Comparison of the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) soil moisture product with the AMSR2 L2 soil moisture product showed that AMSR2 could observe surface soil moisture with nearly same accuracy and stability. However, the bias of the AMSR2 soil moisture measurement was slightly negative and poorer than that of SMOS with deeper soil moisture measurement. It means that AMSR2 cannot effectively measure soil moisture at 3-cm depth. In situ soil temperature at 3-cm depth and surface vegetation (normalized difference vegetation index) did not influence the underestimation of AMSR2 soil moisture measurements. These results suggest that a possible cause of the underestimation of AMSR2 soil moisture measurements is the difference between the depth of the AMSR2 observations and in situ soil moisture measurements. Overall, this study proved the AMSR2 L2 soil moisture product has been useful for monitoring daily surface soil moisture over large grassland areas and it clearly demonstrated the high-performance capability of AMSR2 since 2012.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare Bliss ◽  
John Wainwright ◽  
Danny Donoghue ◽  
Colm Jordan

<p>Surface soil moisture is recognised as an important measurement for use in the assessment of potential slope instability in hydraulically driven landslides.  In this poster we present a nine month time series of surface soil moisture estimates derived from ESA’s Cosmo SkyMed Synthetic Aperture RADAR (SAR) product at the Hollin Hill Landslide Observatory in North Yorkshire, UK.   </p><p>We show the relationship between these SAR-derived SM values and ground-truthed surface soil moisture data, explore spatial relationships between areas of high soil moisture and landslide activity and briefly discuss the potential of SAR data as an input for Landslide Early Warning systems.</p>


CATENA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Zhou ◽  
Bojie Fu ◽  
Guangyao Gao ◽  
Nan Lü ◽  
Yihe Lü ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document