Diagnosis of perforation from the penetrating ulcer of the posterior wall of the duodenum

2020 ◽  
pp. 38-52
Author(s):  
Elizaveta Vladimirova ◽  
Lyubov Tveritneva ◽  
Era Beresneva ◽  
Olga Alekseyechkina ◽  
Irina Popova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Inflammatory Process ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Retroperitoneal Space ◽  
Duodenal Wall ◽  
Perforated Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Perforated Ulcer ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Abdominal Organs ◽  
Penetrating Ulcer

The article is devoted to the problem of emergency surgery for abdominal organs – perforated ulcer of the posterior duodenal wall (duodenum). 140 patients with perforated duodenal ulcer were treated at the N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine between 2016 and 2019. Eight patients had perforation from the penetrating ulcer of the posterior duodenal wall. The average age of patients with perforation from the penetrating ulcers in the posterior duodenal wall was 62.25 years (27 to 78 years). Most of the cases were found in men – 87.5%. 7 patients had surgery at the Institute, one was transferred from another medical institution where he underwent surgery. Four patients were discharged with a favorable outcome, and four died. Two of the deceased patients had perforation associated with penetrating duodenal ulcer that was diagnosed during laparotomy; in two other cases, perforation associated with the penetrating ulcer was detected only during autopsy. A feature of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers when they are localized on the posterior wall of the duodenum is poor clinical manifestation, which is associated with the entry of duodenal contents into a limited retroperitoneal space, leading to a significant inflammatory process of retroperitoneal tissue. Complex use of X-ray examination, oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, and CT allows to correctly assess and timely diagnose perforation associated with the penetrating ulcer of the posterior wall of the duodenum into the retroperitoneal space.

MID-TERM OUTCOME OF PERFORATED DUODENAL ULCER REPAIR USING SINGLE-PORT LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

2016 ◽  
pp. 57-62
Author(s):  
Huu Tri Nguyen ◽  
Loc Le
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Duodenal Wall ◽  
Perforated Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Ulcer Perforation ◽  
Port Site Hernia ◽  
Duodenal Ulcer Perforation

Background: Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is increasingly used in surgery and in the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer. The aim of this study was to evaluate mid-term outcome of perforated duodenal ulcer repair using SPLS. Methods: A prospective study on 72 consecutive patients diagnosed with perforated duodenal ulcer and treated with SPLS at Hue University Hospital and Hue Central Hospital from January 2012 to Mars 2016. Results: The mean age was 48.8 ± 14.0 (17 - 79) years. Male/female ratio was 17.0. Four patients (5.6%) with history of abdominal surgery were successfully treated by pure SPLS. Patients were classified as ASA 1, ASA 2 and ASA 3 in 86.1%, 12.5%, and 1.4% of cases, respectively. Using Boey scoring system, there were 86.1% and 12.5% of cases classified as Boey 0 and Boey 1 while there were no Boey 2 and 3 cases. The average size of perforation was 4.1 ± 2.6 (1.5-22) mm. The perforation was situated on the anterior duodenal wall in 98.6% of cases and on the posterior duodenal wall in 1.4% of cases. There was one case (1.4%) in which one additional trocar was required. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in one patient (1.4%) in which the perforation was situated on the posterior duodenal wall. Average length of hospital stay was 5.7 ± 1.2 (4-12) days. Post-operative complications rate was 2.8%. There was no leakage from the repair site, no port-site hernia and no post-operative mortality. At 2-month follow-up visit, patients were classified as Visick 1 in 95.1% of cases and Visick 2 in 4.9% of cases and the duodenal ulcer was completely healed on gastroduodenoscopy in 86.7% of cases. At 12-month follow-up, patients were classified as Visick 1 in 93.5% of cases and Visick 2 in 4.3% of cases. There was one case (2.2%)diagnosed with recurrent duodenal ulcer perforation at 5 months after the repair of the first perforation. On gastroduodenoscopy, recurrent duodenal ulcer was seen in 8.9% of cases. Conclusions: SPLS is a safe method for the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer. Conversion rate was 1.4%. Recurrent duodenal ulcer rate was 8,9% and recurrent duodenal ulcer perforation rate was 2.2% after 12-month follow-up. Key words: perforated duodenal ulcer, single port laparoscopic repair, single port laparoscopy

scholarly journals VALUE OF X-RAY IN DIAGNOSIS OF PERFORATED DUODENAL ULCER

1927 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 450-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
GEORGE F. COTTLE ◽  
OTIS B. SPALDING
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Perforated Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
X Ray

scholarly journals Need for pyloroplasty and vagotomy in case of perforated duodenal ulcer

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-59
Author(s):  
V. I. Podoluzhniy ◽  
A. B. Startsev ◽  
I. A. Radionov
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Gastric Resection ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Anterior Wall ◽  
Ulcer Formation ◽  
Perforated Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Selective Proximal Vagotomy ◽  
Lesser Curvature

Aim. Estimation of the incidence of stenosis, need for pyloroplasty and validity of vagotomy for perforated duodenal ulcer (PDU). Materials and methods. Twenty-year nature of surgical treatment of patients with PDC in the hospital surgery clinic is analyzed. Results. Over 20 years, 726 patients were operated on: 151 women (20.8%), 575 men (79.2%), mean age 39.1±6.3 years. Surgeries were performed both from laparotomic access and video laparoscopically. It is found that PDU is combined with stenosis in 8.5% and with bleeding in 1.6%, which requires Jadd excision of an ulcer on the anterior wall or gastroduodenotomy for flashing a bleeding ulcer on the posterior wall (0.7%) with subsequent Heineke — Mikulicz pyloroplasty and vagotomy. Both stem vagotomy and selective proximal were used by the method of skeletonization of lesser curvature or chemoneurolysis. Suturing with selective proximal vagotomy was performed in 567 patients, isolated suturing — in 77. B-II distal gastric resection was required in 2.1%. Repeated admission of patients with complications of a duodenal ulcer is observed after isolated suturing of PDU without surgical intervention in the mechanisms of ulcer formation. Conclusion. During surgical treatment of PDU are found in 79.2% of men, in 20.8% of women. There is an emerging stenosis in 8.5% of those who have PDU, which requires a gastric drainage operation. The subjects of choice may be Heineke-Mikulicz pyloroplasty or Jadd excision of an ulcer on the anterior wall. It is advisable to suture or excise an ulcer with pyloroplasty accompanied by vagotomy that normalizes the acid-proteolytic activity of gastric juice in the postoperative period and eliminates need for antisecretory drugs to prevent the recurrence of the disease.

LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR OF PERFORATED DUODENAL ULCER PATCH VERSUS CONVENTIONAL SURGERY

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Anil Kumar Saxena ◽  
Dr. Devi Das Verma
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Duodenal Perforation ◽  
Perforated Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Conventional Surgery ◽  
Duodenal Ulcers ◽  
Duration Of Operation ◽  
Repair Group

Introduction: For many surgeries for duodenal ulcer Laparoscopic repair has become gold standard for many elective procedures such as ant reflux procedures, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and in colorectal surgery. Although in the emergency setting such as in the management of perforated duodenal ulcer Laparoscopic repair has been slow and limited. Since 1990, for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcer Laparoscopic repair has been used which has been widely accepted as an effective method. Duodenal ulcer is defined as a peptic ulcer which develops in the first part of the small intestine called duodenum and usually present as a perforation of acute abdomen. In perforated duodenal symptoms as severe and sudden onset abdominal pain that is worse in right upper quadrant and epigastrium and usually followed by nausea and vomiting. In this situation there is rapid generalization of pain and in examination shows peritonitis with lack of bowel sounds. Aim: The main objective of this study is to evaluate outcome of laparoscopic surgery in comparison with conventional surgery. Material and methods: All the patients with clinically diagnosed with perforated duodenal ulcers presenting within 24 hours of symptoms and undergoing surgery were included during the study period. Total 50 patients were included with age group 15-65 years. All the patients with perforated duodenal ulcers were included which go through either conventional open or laparoscopic without omental patch repair. Result: Total 50 patients were included in these studies which were divided into two group with 25 patients in each group as laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group and conventional open repair group. Mean duration of operation (in minutes) was 105.4±10.4 in laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group whereas mean duration of operation (in minutes) was 67.3±8.6 in conventional open repair group. Mean duration of number of doses of analgesics required in laparoscopic group and conventional open group as 9.5±1.7 and 17.2± 3.1 respectively. Out of 25 patients in each group of laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group and the conventional open repair group the outcome were noted with their post operative complication as shown in table no 5 below.   In Post-operative complications 21(84%) patients in laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group and 14(56%) patients in conventional open repair group had no complications. 4 (16%) patients in the laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group and 2(8%) patients in conventional open repair group showed Post-operative complications as chest infection. In the conventional open repair group  patients present with wound dehiscence and wound infection and Wound dehiscence and chest infection were 4(16%) and 5(20%) respectively whereas nil in Laparoscopic duodenal perforation repair group. Conclusion: Duodenal ulcer perforation is a life-threatening emergency which required urgent management for the patients. Due to the advance in duodenal ulcer perforation closure by laparoscopy it becomes popular and favorite choice. With certain criteria, laparoscopic closure of perforated duodenal ulcer is safe and effective though it was associated with longer operating time and had no impact on the outcome. Hence laparoscopic closure was better in comparison to open repair for the earlier returns to normal daily activities. Keywords:  Duodenal ulcer, Laparoscopic repair, Post-operative analgesia, conventional surgery

RESULTS OF THE SUTURE OF THE PERFORATION BY SINGLE-PORT LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY (SPLS) FOR THE PERFORATED DUODENAL ULCER TREATEMENT

2014 ◽  
pp. 126-132
Author(s):  
Huu Tri Nguyen ◽  
Van Lieu Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Previous History ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Perforated Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Duodenal Ulcers ◽  
The Mean

Background Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) was increasingly used on several surgical diseases. The aim of this study is evaluation of the results of the suture of the perforation by SPLS for the perforated duodenal ulcer treatement. Methods From January 2012 to July 2014, 35 patients with perforated duodenal ulcers underwent simple suture of the perforations by SPLS at Hue University Hospital and Hue Central Hospital. Results The mean age was 45.9 ± 14.4 years. The sex ratio (male/female) was 16.5 and the mean of BMI was 19.2 ± 2.3. There was one patient (2.9%) with previous history of laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. The duration of the symptoms was 9.9 ± 12.3 hours. 97.1% of patients had the perforations of the anterior wall of the duodenum. The mean size of the perforation was 4.7 ± 3.4 mm (2 – 22mm). 2.9% of patients had the perforations of the posterior wall of the duodenum. The rate of the conversion to the open surgery was 2.9%. The mean operative time was 75.8 ± 33.7min, and the mean hospital stay was 5.8 ± 1.4 days. The mean of the analgesic requirement time was 2.9 ± 0.8 days. The wound length was 1.9 ± 0.1 cm. There was 5.9% of the patients had wound infection. There was no operation-related mortality. Conclusions Simple suture of the perforation by single-port laparoscopic surgery is a feasible and safe procedure, and it may be a scarless surgical technique for perforated duodenal ulcers treatement. Key words: single-port laparoscopic surgery, perforated duodenal ulcer

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE OPERATION TECHNIQUE OF PEFORATED DUODENAL ULCER REPAIR BY SINGLEPORT LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

2016 ◽  
pp. 99-105
Author(s):  
Huu Tri Nguyen ◽  
Loc Le ◽  
Doàn Van Phu Nguyen ◽  
Nhu Thanh Dang ◽  
Thanh Phuc Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Time Correlation ◽  
Patch Repair ◽  
Perforated Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery

Background: Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is increasingly used in surgery and in the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer. The aim of this study was to evaluate technical factors for perforated duodenal ulcer repair by SPLS. Methods: A prospective study on 42 consecutive patients diagnosed with perforated duodenal ulcer and treated with SPLS at Hue university of medicine and pharmacy hospital and Hue central hospital from January 2012 to February 2015. Results: The mean age was 48.1 ± 14.2 (17 - 79) years. 40 patients were treated with suture of the perforation by pure SPLS. There was one case (2.4%) in which one additional trocar was required. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in one patient (2.4%) in which the perforation was situated on the posterior duodenal wall. Two patients (4.8%) with history of abdominal surgery were successfully treated by pure SPLS. The size of perforation was correlated with suturing time (correlation coefficient r = 0.459) and operative time (correlation coefficient r = 0.528). Considering suture type, X stitches were used in 95.5% cases, simple stitches were used in one case (2.4%) while Graham patch repair technique was utilized in one case (2.4%) with large perforation. Most cases (95.1%) required only simple suture without omental patch. Peritoneal drainage was spared in most cases (90.2%). Conclusions: SPLS is a safe method for the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer. Posterior duodenal location is the main cause of conversion to open surgery. Factor related to operative time is perforation size. Key words: perforated duodenal ulcer, single port laparoscopic repair, single port laparoscopy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document