FACTORS INFLUENCING THE OPERATION TECHNIQUE OF PEFORATED DUODENAL ULCER REPAIR BY SINGLEPORT LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

2016 ◽  
pp. 99-105
Author(s):  
Huu Tri Nguyen ◽  
Loc Le ◽  
Doàn Van Phu Nguyen ◽  
Nhu Thanh Dang ◽  
Thanh Phuc Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Time Correlation ◽  
Patch Repair ◽  
Perforated Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery

Background: Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is increasingly used in surgery and in the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer. The aim of this study was to evaluate technical factors for perforated duodenal ulcer repair by SPLS. Methods: A prospective study on 42 consecutive patients diagnosed with perforated duodenal ulcer and treated with SPLS at Hue university of medicine and pharmacy hospital and Hue central hospital from January 2012 to February 2015. Results: The mean age was 48.1 ± 14.2 (17 - 79) years. 40 patients were treated with suture of the perforation by pure SPLS. There was one case (2.4%) in which one additional trocar was required. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in one patient (2.4%) in which the perforation was situated on the posterior duodenal wall. Two patients (4.8%) with history of abdominal surgery were successfully treated by pure SPLS. The size of perforation was correlated with suturing time (correlation coefficient r = 0.459) and operative time (correlation coefficient r = 0.528). Considering suture type, X stitches were used in 95.5% cases, simple stitches were used in one case (2.4%) while Graham patch repair technique was utilized in one case (2.4%) with large perforation. Most cases (95.1%) required only simple suture without omental patch. Peritoneal drainage was spared in most cases (90.2%). Conclusions: SPLS is a safe method for the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer. Posterior duodenal location is the main cause of conversion to open surgery. Factor related to operative time is perforation size. Key words: perforated duodenal ulcer, single port laparoscopic repair, single port laparoscopy

RESULTS OF THE SUTURE OF THE PERFORATION BY SINGLE-PORT LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY (SPLS) FOR THE PERFORATED DUODENAL ULCER TREATEMENT

2014 ◽  
pp. 126-132
Author(s):  
Huu Tri Nguyen ◽  
Van Lieu Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Previous History ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Perforated Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Duodenal Ulcers ◽  
The Mean

Background Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) was increasingly used on several surgical diseases. The aim of this study is evaluation of the results of the suture of the perforation by SPLS for the perforated duodenal ulcer treatement. Methods From January 2012 to July 2014, 35 patients with perforated duodenal ulcers underwent simple suture of the perforations by SPLS at Hue University Hospital and Hue Central Hospital. Results The mean age was 45.9 ± 14.4 years. The sex ratio (male/female) was 16.5 and the mean of BMI was 19.2 ± 2.3. There was one patient (2.9%) with previous history of laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. The duration of the symptoms was 9.9 ± 12.3 hours. 97.1% of patients had the perforations of the anterior wall of the duodenum. The mean size of the perforation was 4.7 ± 3.4 mm (2 – 22mm). 2.9% of patients had the perforations of the posterior wall of the duodenum. The rate of the conversion to the open surgery was 2.9%. The mean operative time was 75.8 ± 33.7min, and the mean hospital stay was 5.8 ± 1.4 days. The mean of the analgesic requirement time was 2.9 ± 0.8 days. The wound length was 1.9 ± 0.1 cm. There was 5.9% of the patients had wound infection. There was no operation-related mortality. Conclusions Simple suture of the perforation by single-port laparoscopic surgery is a feasible and safe procedure, and it may be a scarless surgical technique for perforated duodenal ulcers treatement. Key words: single-port laparoscopic surgery, perforated duodenal ulcer

MID-TERM OUTCOME OF PERFORATED DUODENAL ULCER REPAIR USING SINGLE-PORT LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

2016 ◽  
pp. 57-62
Author(s):  
Huu Tri Nguyen ◽  
Loc Le
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Duodenal Wall ◽  
Perforated Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Ulcer Perforation ◽  
Port Site Hernia ◽  
Duodenal Ulcer Perforation

Background: Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is increasingly used in surgery and in the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer. The aim of this study was to evaluate mid-term outcome of perforated duodenal ulcer repair using SPLS. Methods: A prospective study on 72 consecutive patients diagnosed with perforated duodenal ulcer and treated with SPLS at Hue University Hospital and Hue Central Hospital from January 2012 to Mars 2016. Results: The mean age was 48.8 ± 14.0 (17 - 79) years. Male/female ratio was 17.0. Four patients (5.6%) with history of abdominal surgery were successfully treated by pure SPLS. Patients were classified as ASA 1, ASA 2 and ASA 3 in 86.1%, 12.5%, and 1.4% of cases, respectively. Using Boey scoring system, there were 86.1% and 12.5% of cases classified as Boey 0 and Boey 1 while there were no Boey 2 and 3 cases. The average size of perforation was 4.1 ± 2.6 (1.5-22) mm. The perforation was situated on the anterior duodenal wall in 98.6% of cases and on the posterior duodenal wall in 1.4% of cases. There was one case (1.4%) in which one additional trocar was required. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in one patient (1.4%) in which the perforation was situated on the posterior duodenal wall. Average length of hospital stay was 5.7 ± 1.2 (4-12) days. Post-operative complications rate was 2.8%. There was no leakage from the repair site, no port-site hernia and no post-operative mortality. At 2-month follow-up visit, patients were classified as Visick 1 in 95.1% of cases and Visick 2 in 4.9% of cases and the duodenal ulcer was completely healed on gastroduodenoscopy in 86.7% of cases. At 12-month follow-up, patients were classified as Visick 1 in 93.5% of cases and Visick 2 in 4.3% of cases. There was one case (2.2%)diagnosed with recurrent duodenal ulcer perforation at 5 months after the repair of the first perforation. On gastroduodenoscopy, recurrent duodenal ulcer was seen in 8.9% of cases. Conclusions: SPLS is a safe method for the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer. Conversion rate was 1.4%. Recurrent duodenal ulcer rate was 8,9% and recurrent duodenal ulcer perforation rate was 2.2% after 12-month follow-up. Key words: perforated duodenal ulcer, single port laparoscopic repair, single port laparoscopy

Evaluating the Learning Curve Associated with Laparoscopic Left Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 366-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Yamamoto ◽  
Junji Okuda ◽  
Keitaro Tanaka ◽  
Keisaku Kondo ◽  
Keiko Asai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Splenic Flexure ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Left Hemicolectomy ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Descending Colon ◽  
Descending Colon Cancer

The role of laparoscopic surgery for transverse and descending colon cancer remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to characterize the learning curve for laparoscopic left hemicolectomy including the splenic flexure and to identify factors that influence this learning curve. Data from 120 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic left hemicolectomy for transverse and descending colon cancer including the splenic flexure between December 1996 and December 2009 were analyzed. Patients undergoing resection combined with cholecystectomy, hepatectomy, hysterectomy, or gastrectomy were excluded. Operative time was analyzed using the moving average method. The operative time, conversion rate, and postoperative complication rate were evaluated among four groups based on the number of cases required for analysis of operative time. In addition, risk factors that influenced conversion to open surgery were analyzed. Operative time for left hemicolectomy decreased with increasing case number with stabilization at 30 cases. There was no significant difference in the conversion rate or postoperative complications over time. Significant factors for conversion to open surgery were T stage (odds ratio [OR], 5.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 to 27.4) and previous abdominal surgery (OR, 5.38; 95% CI, 1.6 to 20.2). The learning curve for laparoscopic left hemicolectomy is steep. Thus, surgeons in the early part of this curve should carefully select patients to allow them to build experience in a stepwise manner. Laparoscopic surgery may become the gold standard for management of colon cancer regardless of stage or tumor location.

scholarly journals ALTERNATIVE TECHNIQUE FOR CHOLECYSTECTOMY COMPARABLE TO SINGLE PORT

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos SABBAG ◽  
Ana BLITZCKOW
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Alternative Technique ◽  
New Techniques ◽  
Cosmetic Results ◽  
Aesthetic Results ◽  
Conventional Material

ABSTRACT Background: With the advancement of laparoscopic surgery, new techniques have been proposed and disseminated in order to reduce the surgical aggression and get better cosmetic results. Aim: To present alternative technique for videocholecystectomy comparable to single port technique using conventional material for laparoscopic surgery. Method: Introduction of laparoscopic devices using two incisions; gallbladder traction with thread, exposition of Calot triangle, and ligature of cystic pedicle with polymer clips. Results: Nine operations were carried out with this method, without complications and no increase in operative time, being compared to conventional videocholecistectomy, however vastly superior in aesthetic results. Conclusion: The technique is feasible, reproducible, showing benefits to patient´s safety

Evaluating the Evolving Morbidity of Omentoplasty for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (10) ◽  
pp. 1289-1295
Author(s):  
Noah Swann ◽  
Nobel LeTendre ◽  
Brian Cox ◽  
James Recabaren
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Patch Repair ◽  
Perioperative Morbidity ◽  
Graham Patch

Mortality for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) surgery ranges from 2-22% with morbidity ranging from 15-45%. Traditionally, these had been repaired with vagotomy and antrectomy or pyloroplasty with smaller perforations repaired with an omentoplasty. Laparoscopic repair has become increasingly prevalent and demonstrated to have shorter length of stay (LOS) and fewer complications. We are evaluating the surgical repair of PPU with omentoplasty to determine trends of utilization and surgical outcomes. We conducted a 13-year (2005-2017) retrospective review, utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. A total of 6873 patients had open or laparoscopic repair of a PPU, with 2285 patients identified as utilizing omentoplasty. Five hundred eighty-eight omentoplasty patients were further identified as having a laparoscopic technique. We compared patient demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative morbidity and mortality for surgical patients between 2005-2011 and 2012-2017. We trended the perioperative outcomes across the study intervals. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used to evaluate outcomes. Between 2005 and between 2017, laparoscopic surgical repair with omentoplasty has increased from 3.8% to 34.6%. Overall mortality for open operations declined during this interval (12.7%-9.3%) while it remained unchanged for laparoscopic operations (4.6%-4.2%), there was not a significant difference between the laparoscopic and open 30-day mortality. Both open surgery and laparoscopic surgery are being used on an increasingly healthy cohort (increased functional status decreased predicted perioperative morbidity). Relative to the 2005-2011, the laparoscopic surgery 2012-2017 cohort had increases in both serious and overall morbidity, although this was not statistically significant. Compared to the 2005-2011, the 2012-2017 open surgery cohort had increasing serious morbidity (OR 2.03) and overall morbidity (OR 1.91). There was a trend of decreasing LOS and increased return to the operating room for patients with laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic Graham patch repair of peptic ulcers significantly increased, although open repair still constitutes the majority of the cases. Despite Graham patch repair being utilized on a healthier patient population, morbidity and mortality for laparoscopic repair have remained unchanged. Postoperative morbidity and mortality for open surgery have increased. This indicates that laparoscopic repair is more commonly utilized for low- or medium risk patients, leaving an increasingly sick patient population selected to open repair.

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor in esophagogastric junction: A multi-center, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score matching.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11534-11534
Author(s):  
Wenjun Xiong ◽  
Tao Chen ◽  
Xingyu Feng ◽  
Yuting Xu ◽  
Jin Wan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Esophagogastric Junction ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Liquid Intake

11534 Background: Laparoscopic resection is increasingly performed for Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Nevertheless, laparoscopic approach for the GIST located in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ-GIST) represent a surgical challenge. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and open procedure for EGJ-GIST through the propensity score matching (PSM) method. Methods: Between April 2006 and April 2018, 1824 patients underwent surgery were finally diagnosed with primary gastric GIST at four medical centers in South China. EGJ-GIST was defined as a GIST with an upper border of less than 5 cm from the EG line. Among them, 228 patients were identified and retrospectively reviewed with regard to clinicopathological characteristics, operative information and long-term outcomes. The PSM methods was used to eliminate the selection bias. Results: After PSM, 102 cases, consisted of 51 laparoscopic (LA) and 51 open surgery (OP), were enrolled. The match factors contained year of surgery, gender, age, BMI, tumor size, mitotic rate, recurrence risk and adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment. The LA group was superior to the OP group in operative time (108.5±56.5 vs. 169.3±79.0 min, P <0.001), blood loss (54.6±81.9 vs. 104.9±156.4 ml, P = 0.042), time to liquid intake (3.1±1.8 vs. 4.3±2.2 d, P = 0.003), hospital stay (6.0±2.3 vs. 9.9±8.1, P = 0.001), and postoperative complication (5.9% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.006). The median follow-up was 55 (range, 2-153) months in the entire cohort. No significant differences were detected in either the relapse-free survival (RFS, P = 0.109) or overall survival (OS, P = 0.113) between two groups. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS in the LA and OP groups were 100.0%, 95.5%, 91.0% and 100.0%, 90.8%, 85.7%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in the LA and OP group were 100%, 95.6%, 91.3% and 100.0%, 91.1%, 85.4%, respectively. Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery for EGJ-GIST is associated with the advantages of shorter operative time, reduced blood loss, shorter time to liquid intake and shorter length of stay, all without compromising post-operative outcomes and long-term survival.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Urological Surgery: Our Initial Experiences

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23
Author(s):  
Shiba Prasad Nandy ◽  
AKM Akramul Bari ◽  
Anirban Ghose ◽  
Hasmot Ali Mia ◽  
Md Alamgir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radical Nephrectomy ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Renal Cyst ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Cyst Excision ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
The Mean

Introduction and Objective: Laparoscopic surgery is increasingly exercised in urology due to improvements in technical capabilities and experience. It comes with many advantages compared to open surgery such as lesser degree of pain and haemorrhage, shorter hospital stay and better cosmetic results. This study is carried out to evaluate the outcomes and complications of urological laparoscopic surgery cases performed Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Chattogram, Bangladesh. Methods: This was a hospital based prospective observational study of total 29 patients, who received laparoscopic surgery of different kinds between January 2017 and September 2019 for urological causes with a minimum one month follow-up. Included patients were assessed in terms of demographic characteristics, preoperative diagnosis, type of laparoscopic approach, duration of surgery and hospitalization, complications after surgery and need for conversion to open surgery. Results: The mean age was 45.03 years where 12 patients were women and 17 were male. All patients underwent trans-peritoneal procedures where2 patients received renal cyst excision, 4 simple nephrectomy, 5 ureterolithotomy, 9 radical nephrectomy, 1 radical cystectomy, 2 adrenalectomy, 3 pyelolithotomy and 3 pyeloplasty. Three of the 29 patients required conversion to open surgery. Except these patients, no major complication or mortality was encountered. The mean duration of surgery for the most commonly applied procedures were as follows: renal cyst excision 87.5 (70-105) min, simple nephrectomy 141.25 (120-170) min, ureterolithotomy 120 (100-140) min, radical nephrectomy 215.56 (180-260) min, pyelolithotomy 120 (100-140) min, and pyeloplasty 156.67 (130-190) min. The mean hospital stay was 4.59±1.7 (2-8) days. Conclusions: The success and complications rate of the laparoscopic urological surgeries performed in our hospital were consistent with those reported in the literature. In the light of technological advances and increasing experience, we believe that laparoscopic surgery is an effective technique with excellent outcome along with a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery in the field of urology. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 23, No. 1, January 2020 p.17-23

Laparoscopic omental patch repair of perforated duodenal ulcer with an automated stapler

1994 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 923-923
Author(s):  
A. Wyman ◽  
R. C. Stuart ◽  
A. Darzi ◽  
J. R. T. Monson
Keyword(s):  
Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Patch Repair ◽  
Perforated Duodenal Ulcer ◽  
Omental Patch
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document