scholarly journals Limited value of chest radiography in predicting aetiology of lower respiratory tract infection in general practice

2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (547) ◽  
pp. 93-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Willy Graffelman ◽  
Francois EJA Willemssen ◽  
Harmine M Zonderland ◽  
Arie Knuistingh Neven ◽  
Aloys CM Kroes ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e96189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuelle Ecochard-Dugelay ◽  
Muriel Beliah ◽  
Caroline Boisson ◽  
Francis Perreaux ◽  
Jocelyne de Laveaucoupet ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 1601303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannu Syrjala ◽  
Markku Broas ◽  
Pasi Ohtonen ◽  
Airi Jartti ◽  
Eija Pääkkö

We assessed whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is applicable for diagnosing pneumonia among adult outpatients with lower respiratory tract infection.Patients were recruited prospectively when they had symptoms for ≤7 days and fever ≥37.8 °C. The patients underwent high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), MRI and chest radiography, which were repeated 1 month later if necessary, to verify pneumonia. The duration of MRI examination was 3–4 min.Among 77 patients, HRCT, MRI and radiography identified 32 (41.6%), 30 (39.0%) and 23 (29.9%) cases of pneumonia, respectively (p=0.001). MRI missed two HRCT-identified pneumonia cases due to motion artefacts. Chest radiography resulted in four false-positive pneumonia findings and MRI resulted in none. When HRCT was used as a reference, MRI had a sensitivity of 0.938 (95% CI 0.799–0.983) and specificity of 0.978 (95% CI 0.884–0.996) for the diagnosis of pneumonia, whereas the sensitivity and specificity for chest radiography were 0.719 (95% CI 0.546–0.844) and 0.911 (95% CI 0.793–0.965), respectively.MRI is an accurate, fast and effective method for diagnosing outpatient pneumonia, with better accuracy compared with chest radiography and almost similar accuracy compared with HRCT.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000761
Author(s):  
Hendrik Johannes Prins ◽  
Ruud Duijkers ◽  
Johannes M A Daniels ◽  
Thys van der Molen ◽  
Tjip S van der Werf ◽  
...  

BackgroundWe developed the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-Lower Respiratory Tract Infection-Visual Analogue Score (c-LRTI-VAS) in order to easily quantify symptoms during exacerbations in patients with COPD. This study aimed to validate this score.MethodsIn our study, patients with stable COPD as well as those with an acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) were included. The results of c-LRTI-VAS were compared with other markers of disease activity (lung function parameters, oxygen saturation and two health related quality of life questionnaires (St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ)) and validity, reliability and responsiveness were assessed.ResultsEighty-eight patients with clinically stable COPD and 102 patients who had an AECOPD completed the c-LRTI-VAS questionnaire. When testing on two separate occasions for repeatability, no statistically significant difference between total scores was found 0.143 (SD 5.42) (p=0.826). Internal consistency was high across items (Cronbach’s apha 0.755). Correlation with SGRQ and CCQ total scores was moderate to high. After treatment for hospitalised AECOPD, the mean c-LRTI-VAS total score improved 8.14 points (SD 9.13; p≤0.001).Conclusionsc-LRTI-VAS showed proper validity, responsiveness to change and moderate to high correlation with other questionnaires. It, therefore, appears a reliable tool for symptom measurement during AECOPD.Trial registration numberNCT01232140.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document