scholarly journals The value of the GP’s clinical judgement in predicting dementia: a multicentre prospective cohort study among patients in general practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (688) ◽  
pp. e786-e793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Pentzek ◽  
Michael Wagner ◽  
Heinz-Harald Abholz ◽  
Horst Bickel ◽  
Hanna Kaduszkiewicz ◽  
...  

BackgroundClinical judgement is intrinsic to diagnostic strategies in general practice; however, empirical evidence for its validity is sparse.AimTo ascertain whether a GP’s global clinical judgement of future cognitive status has an added value for predicting a patient’s likelihood of experiencing dementia.Design and settingMulticentre prospective cohort study among patients in German general practice that took place from January 2003 to October 2016.MethodPatients without baseline dementia were assessed with neuropsychological interviews over 12 years; 138 GPs rated the future cognitive decline of their participating patients. Associations of baseline predictors with follow-up incident dementia were analysed with mixed-effects logistic and Cox regression.ResultsA total of 3201 patients were analysed over the study period (mean age = 79.6 years, 65.3% females, 6.7% incident dementia in 3 years, 22.1% incident dementia in 12 years). Descriptive analyses and comparison with other cohorts identified the participants as having frequent and long-lasting doctor–patient relationships and being well known to their GPs. The GP baseline rating of future cognitive decline had significant value for 3-year dementia prediction, independent of cognitive test scores and patient’s memory complaints (GP ratings of very mild (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] = 1.28 to 3.04); mild (OR 3.00, 95% CI = 1.90 to 4.76); and moderate/severe decline (OR 5.66, 95% CI = 3.29 to 9.73)). GPs’ baseline judgements were significantly associated with patients’ 12-year dementia-free survival rates (Mantel–Cox log rank test P<0.001).ConclusionIn this sample of patients in familiar doctor–patient relationships, the GP’s clinical judgement holds additional value for predicting dementia, complementing test performance and patients’ self-reports. Existing and emerging primary care-based dementia risk models should consider the GP’s judgement as one predictor. Results underline the importance of the GP-patient relationship.

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 455-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Koch ◽  
M. van Bokhoven ◽  
P. Bindels ◽  
T van der Weijden ◽  
G. Dinant ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
H. Miao ◽  
K. Chen ◽  
X. Yan ◽  
F. Chen

Background: This study aimed to investigate the association between sugar in beverage and dementia, Alzheimer Disease (AD) dementia and stroke. Methods: This prospective cohort study were based on the US community-based Framingham Heart Study (FHS). Sugar in beverage was assessed between 1991 and 1995 (5th exam). Surveillance for incident events including dementia and stroke commenced at examination 9 through 2014 and continued for 15-20 years. Results: At baseline, a total of 1865 (63%) subjects consumed no sugar in beverage, whereas 525 (18%) subjects consumed it in 1-7 servings/week and 593 (29%) in over 7 servings/week. Over an average follow-up of 19 years in 1384 participants, there were 275 dementia events of which 73 were AD dementia. And 103 of 1831 participants occurred stroke during the follow-up nearly 16 years. After multivariate adjustments, individuals with the highest intakes of sugar in beverage had a higher risk of all dementia, AD dementia and stroke relative to individuals with no intakes, with HRs of 2.80(95%CI 2.24-3.50) for all dementia, 2.55(95%CI 1.55-4.18) for AD dementia, and 2.11(95%CI 1.48-3.00) for stroke. And the same results were shown in the subgroup for individuals with median intakes of sugar in beverage. Conclusion: Higher consumption of sugar in beverage was associated with an increased risk of all dementia, AD dementia and stroke.


2017 ◽  
Vol 207 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Carroll ◽  
Matthew J Spittal ◽  
Anna R Kemp‐Casey ◽  
Nicholas G Lennox ◽  
David B Preen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-181
Author(s):  
Kodai Hatta ◽  
Yasuyuki Gondo ◽  
Kei Kamide ◽  
Yukie Masui ◽  
Hiroki Inagaki ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Smith ◽  
Igor Grabovac ◽  
Lin Yang ◽  
Guillermo F. López-Sánchez ◽  
Joe Firth ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. S14 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ozawa ◽  
M. Shipley ◽  
M. Kivimaki ◽  
A. Singh-Manoux ◽  
E. Brunner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document