Faculty Opinions recommendation of Death after PEG: results of the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death.

Author(s):  
Nigel Umar Beejay ◽  
Philip Woodland
Author(s):  
Charles Gibson ◽  
Fred Roberts

This final chapter contains a selection of useful information for the anaesthetist, gathered together for convenience and for the aid of revision in examinations. It contains the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, the (National) Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death classification, the Mapleson classification of breathing systems, a discussion of pulmonary function tests and their normal values, cardiovascular physiology data, the Glasgow Coma Scale, and a series of useful anaesthetic equations and definitions. It concludes with a table of normal values, a list of useful websites, and a checklist for anaesthetic equipment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
D'Marieanne Koomson ◽  
Neil Smith ◽  
Simon McPherson ◽  
Vivek Srivastava

The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death review into the quality of care provided to UK patients with a new diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism highlights both clinical and organisational changes that should be made to improve patient care and outcomes.


2015 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
K A Wilkinson ◽  
H Freeth ◽  
I C Martin

AbstractObjectives:The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death presents a detailed survey of practice, encompassing the care pathway for patients with a new tracheostomy formed in hospital, alongside a review of organisational aspects of care.Results:Tracheostomy formation has come to be regarded as a relatively low-risk procedure that can be carried out safely at the bedside, even in high-risk patients. Information on how many procedures are carried out percutaneously has been poor and not captured by existing UK data collection systems.Conclusion:The study reinforces recommendations made by other healthcare groups, and presents new information which can be used as a basis for discussion and future planning to improve patient outcomes. The importance of meticulous ongoing care of a tracheostomy is recognised as important to prevent patient complications. Bedside staff must have the knowledge, competencies and confidence to deal with common and potentially life-threatening emergencies when they occur.


2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-106
Author(s):  
NCE Smith ◽  
GP Findlay ◽  
D Weyman ◽  
H Freeth

Introduction In 2006 the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death undertook a large prospective study of trauma care, which revealed several findings pertaining to the management of head injuries in a sample of 493 patients. Methods Case note data were collected for all trauma patients admitted to all hospitals accepting emergencies in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Channel Islands over a three-month period. Severely injured patients with an injury severity score (ISS) of ≥16 were included in the study. The case notes for these patients were peer reviewed by a multidisciplinary group of clinicians, who rated the overall level of care the patient received. Results Of the 795 patients who met the inclusion criteria for the study, 493 were admitted with a head injury. Room for improvement in the level of care was found in a substantial number of patients (265/493). Good practice was found to be highest in high volume centres. The overall head injury management was found to be satisfactory in 84% of cases (319/381). Conclusions This study has shown that care for trauma patients with head injury is frequently rated as less than good and suggests potential long-term remedies for the problem, including a reconfiguration of trauma services and better provision of neurocritical care facilities.


2008 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon D. Johnston ◽  
Tony C.K. Tham ◽  
Marisa Mason

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii65
Author(s):  
Roisin Coary ◽  
Kathryn McCarthy ◽  
Haytham Sumrien ◽  
David Shipway

Abstract Background In the United Kingdom, the 2010 National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death report ‘An Age Old Problem’ outlined significant shortcomings in the perioperative care of older people. Other than hip fractures, the care of older patients under surgical specialities is largely devoid of routine geriatrician input. In August 2018, we introduced daily geriatric reviews (GR) on the gastrointestinal surgical wards, aiming to improve length of stay (LOS) and mortality. Methods All acute general surgery admissions for patients ≥70 years were reviewed between September and October 2017 (pre-introduction) and 2018 (post-introduction), and outcomes compared. For 2018, comparisons were also made between those who had GR and those who didn’t. Results There were 173 admissions in 2017, vs 190 in 2018. In both 2017 and 2018, median age was 80, median LOS was 4 days, and clinical frailty scale (CFS) 4. Twenty-two percent (38/173) of patients had a surgical procedure in 2017, vs 33% (63/190) in 2018. Inpatient mortality was 8% (13/173) in 2017 (median CFS 6), vs 6% (11/190) in 2018 (median CFS 6). In 2018, 21% (40/190) of patients had GR: median time to review 3 days. 54% (n=22) of the patients with GR underwent a surgical procedure, 37% (n=15) were admitted to ICU, and inpatient mortality was 5% (n=2), vs 28% (n=42), 4% (n=6) and 6% (n=9) respectively for those without GR. 30 day readmission for those with GR was 12.5% (n=5), vs 18.4% (n=28) for those not seen. Conclusion While more surgical procedures were performed in 2018 (post-introduction), overall LOS remained unchanged and improved mortality was observed compared to 2017. Geriatricians are seeing more post-operative and ICU patients, and despite presumed increased complexity, both mortality and readmission rates remain low. Screening for frailty and specific inclusion criteria may improve rates of GR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document