Faculty Opinions recommendation of Bispectral and spectral entropy indices at propofol-induced loss of consciousness in young and elderly patients.

Author(s):  
Christian Jeleazcov
2009 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Lysakowski ◽  
N. Elia ◽  
C. Czarnetzki ◽  
L. Dumont ◽  
G. Haller ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 447-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harald Wolf ◽  
Wolfgang Machold ◽  
Sophie Frantal ◽  
Mathias Kecht ◽  
Gholam Pajenda ◽  
...  

Object This study presents newly defined risk factors for detecting clinically important brain injury requiring neurosurgical intervention and intensive care, and compares it with the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR). Methods This prospective cohort study was conducted in a single Austrian Level-I trauma center and enrolled a consecutive sample of mildly head-injured adults who presented to the emergency department with witnessed loss of consciousness, disorientation, or amnesia, and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13–15. The studied population consisted of a large number of elderly patients living in Vienna. The aim of the study was to investigate risk factors that help to predict the need for immediate cranial CT in patients with mild head trauma. Results Among the 12,786 enrolled patients, 1307 received a cranial CT scan. Four hundred eighty-nine patients (37.4%) with a mean age of 63.9 ± 22.8 years had evidence of an acute traumatic intracranial lesion on CT. Three patients (< 0.1%) were admitted to the intensive care unit for neurological observation and received oropharyngeal intubation. Seventeen patients (0.1%) underwent neurosurgical intervention. In 818 patients (62.6%), no evidence of an acute trauma-related lesion was found on CT. Data analysis showed that the presence of at least 1 of the following factors can predict the necessity of cranial CT: amnesia, GCS score, age > 65 years, loss of consciousness, nausea or vomiting, hypocoagulation, dementia or a history of ischemic stroke, anisocoria, skull fracture, and development of a focal neurological deficit. Patients requiring neurosurgical intervention were detected with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 67% by using the authors' analysis. In contrast, the use of the CCHR in these patients detected the need for neurosurgical intervention with a sensitivity of only 80% and a specificity of 72%. Conclusions The use of the suggested parameters proved to be superior in the detection of high-risk patients who sustained a mild head trauma compared with the CCHR rules. Further validation of these results in a multicenter setting is needed. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT00451789 (ClinicalTrials.gov.)


Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (16) ◽  
pp. e15132
Author(s):  
Ann Hee You ◽  
Ji Young Kim ◽  
Do-Hyeong Kim ◽  
Jiwoo Suh ◽  
Dong Woo Han

2016 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Yang ◽  
Yun Yue ◽  
Jonathan Z Pan ◽  
Ming-Zhang Zuo ◽  
Yu Shi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiyuki Nakanishi ◽  
Yoshiki Sento ◽  
Yuji Kamimura ◽  
Tatsuya Tsuji ◽  
Eisuke Kako ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Remimazolam, a novel benzodiazepine, has been reported to cause less hypotension than propofol during induction of anesthesia. Therefore, remimazolam might be a valuable option in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis who are considered to be the most vulnerable to hemodynamic instability. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and hemodynamic effects of remimazolam as an induction agent in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis. Methods This prospective, open-label, single-arm, observational pilot study was conducted in a university hospital between November 2020 and April 2021. We included 20 patients aged 65 years or older scheduled for transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis under general anesthesia. Patients were administered intravenous remimazolam infusion at 6 mg/kg/h combined with 0.25 μg/kg/min of remifentanil infusion. The primary outcome was the vasopressor dosage between the induction of anesthesia and the completion of tracheal intubation. The secondary outcomes included hemodynamic changes, bispectral index changes, and the time from the start of remimazolam infusion to loss of consciousness. We also recorded awareness during anesthesia induction and serious adverse events related to death, life-threatening events, prolonged hospitalizations, and disability due to permanent damage. Results Twenty patients aged 84 [79–86] (median [interquartile range]) with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 4 were analyzed. Ephedrine 0 [0–4] mg and phenylephrine 0.1 [0–0.1] mg were administered to 14/20 patients (3 doses in 1 patient, 2 doses in 4 patients, and one dose in 9 patients). Loss of consciousness was achieved at 80 [69–86] s after the remimazolam infusion was started. The mean arterial pressure decreased gradually after loss of consciousness but recovered immediately after tracheal intubation. The bispectral index values gradually decreased and reached < 60 at 120 s after loss of consciousness. Neither awareness during induction of anesthesia nor serious adverse events, such as severe bradycardia (< 40 bpm), life-threatening arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia, or anaphylactic reactions were observed. Conclusions Remimazolam could be used as an induction agent with timely bolus vasopressors in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis. Trial registration UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, identifier UMIN000042318.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document