Faculty Opinions recommendation of The relationship between clinical outcomes and medication adherence in difficult-to-control asthma.

Author(s):  
Frank Kanniess
Thorax ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 67 (8) ◽  
pp. 751-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna C Murphy ◽  
Amandine Proeschal ◽  
Christopher E Brightling ◽  
Andrew J Wardlaw ◽  
Ian Pavord ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marla J De Jong ◽  
Debra K Moser ◽  
Misook L Chung ◽  
Jia-Rong Wu

Anxiety has been linked to adverse outcomes for patients with cardiac disease but the mechanism for this relationship is unknown. Nonadherence to prescribed medications is common in heart disease, particularly heart failure (HF), and may mediate the relationship between anxiety and outcomes. To determine if nonadherence to prescribed medications mediates any relationship between anxiety and clinical outcomes in patients with HF. Patients (N=147; age 61±11 yrs, 44% female, 59% NYHA class III/IV) with chronic HF were followed 389±324 days for clinical events (composite of death, emergency department visit, or hospitalization). Patients completed the anxiety subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory at baseline. Objective evidence of medication adherence was measured with the Medication Event Monitoring System. Survival and regression analyses were used to test whether medication nonadherence mediated any association between anxiety and outcomes. Patients with highest anxiety had shorter event-free survival than patients with lower anxiety (Fig. ). After adjusting for age, gender, and NYHA class in Cox regression, high anxiety predicted (OR 2.4; p=.001) clinical events. Anxiety predicted medication doses taken (p=.01) and days correct doses taken (p=.008). Medication doses taken (p=.01) and days dose taken (p=.008) also predicted clinical outcomes. Medication nonadherence mediated the relationship between high anxiety and worse outcomes. This is the first study to show that medication nonadherence links anxiety and clinical outcomes. Interventions that decrease anxiety may improve both medication adherence and outcomes.


Thorax ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 65 (Suppl 4) ◽  
pp. A151-A151 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Murphy ◽  
A. Proeschel ◽  
M. E. Linnett ◽  
C. E. Brightling ◽  
A. J. Wardlaw ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Syaiful Katadi ◽  
Tri Murti Andayani ◽  
Dwi Endarti

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are patients with a low level of treatment adherence. Low adherence is often the cause of treatment failure, so the risk of complications is higher and can affect the quality of life of patients. This study aimed to determine the relationship between treatment adherence to clinical outcomes and the quality of life of patients with type 2 DM. This study used a cross sectional design involving patients with type 2 DM who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria in three health centers in Bantul, Yogyakarta. Data on patient medication compliance was obtained using medication adherence report scale questionnaire (MARS-5), patient quality of life data using Short-Form 6 Dimensions questionnaire (SF-6D), data on fasting blood glucose levels (GDS / GDP) from medical records, socio demographic data obtained from respondents and medical records. The relationship between the level of adherence to clinical outcomes using Chi-square analysis while the relationship between the level of adherence to quality of life using Spearman Rho analysis. The total number of respondents involved was 179 patients, the majority had a low level of adherence (57%), clinical outcomes that had not been achieved (68.7%), and the average utility score was high (0.816). There was a relationship between medication adherence to clinical outcomes (P = 0.002; OR = 2.875). Similarly, between adherence to quality of life, there is a significant relationship (P = 0.006) with a weak correlation level (r = 0.204). Therefore, patients and Health professionals, especially pharmacists, need to pay attention to medication adherence to achieve optimal clinical outcomes and a better quality of life.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana Drzayich Antol ◽  
Adrianne Waldman Casebeer ◽  
Raya Khoury ◽  
Todd Michael ◽  
Andrew Renda ◽  
...  

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e037468
Author(s):  
Alyssa Paige Tabrisky ◽  
Lara S Coffin ◽  
David P Olem ◽  
Torsten B Neilands ◽  
Mallory O'Neill Johnson

Introduction Advances in HIV treatment have proven to be effective in increasing virological suppression, thereby decreasing morbidity, and increasing survival. Medication adherence is an important factor in reducing viral load among people living with HIV (PLWH) and in the elimination of transmission of HIV to uninfected partners. Achieving optimal medication adherence involves individuals taking their medications every day or as prescribed by their provider. However, not all PLWH in the USA are engaged in care, and only a minority have achieved suppressed viral load (viral load that is lower than the detectable limit of the assay). Sexual and gender minorities (SGM; those who do not identify as heterosexual or those who do not identify as the sex they were assigned at birth) represent a high-risk population for poor clinical outcomes and increased risk of HIV transmission, as they face barriers that can prevent optimal engagement in HIV care. Research in dyadic support, specifically within primary romantic partnerships, offers a promising avenue to improving engagement in care and treatment outcomes among SGM couples. Dyadic interventions, especially focused on primary romantic partnerships, have the potential to have a sustained impact after the structured intervention ends. Methods and analysis This paper describes the protocol for a randomised control trial of a theory-grounded, piloted intervention (DuoPACT) that cultivates and leverages the inherent sources of support within primary romantic relationships to improve engagement in HIV care and thus clinical outcomes among persons who are living with HIV and who identify as SGM (or their partners). Eligible participants must report being in a primary romantic relationship for at least 3 months, speak English, at least one partner must identify as a sexual or gender minority and at least one partner must be HIV+ with suboptimal engagement in HIV care, defined as less than excellent medication adherence, having not seen a provider in at least the past 8 months, having a detectable or unknown viral load or not currently on antiretroviral therapy. Eligible consenting couples are allocated equally to the two study arms: a structured six-session couples counselling intervention (DuoPACT) or a three-session individually-delivered HIV adherence counselling intervention (LifeSteps). The primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of DuoPACT on virological suppression among HIV+ members of SGM couples with suboptimal engagement in care. The DuoPACT study began its target enrolment of 150 couples (300 individuals) in August 2017, and will continue to enrol until June 2021. Ethics and dissemination All procedures are approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of California, San Francisco. Written informed consent is obtained from all participants at enrolment, and study progress is reviewed twice yearly by an external Safety Monitoring Committee. Dissemination activities will include formal publications and report back sessions with the community. Trial registration number NCT02925949; Pre-results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document