asthma medication
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

357
(FIVE YEARS 69)

H-INDEX

36
(FIVE YEARS 3)

Author(s):  
Natacha Biset ◽  
Wies Kestens ◽  
Dominique Detemmerman ◽  
Murielle Lona ◽  
Güngör Karakaya ◽  
...  

(1) Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases in the world among children. The main purpose of this study was to analyze the consumption of asthma medications in order to investigate asthma in children (2–18 years) and the association with health care consumption; (2) a retrospective study using anonymized administrative data for 2013–2018 from the third largest Belgian health insurer was conducted; (3) in 2018, 12.9% of children received at least one asthma medication and 4.4% received at least two packages with a minimum of 30 days between purchases. Preschool children (2–6 years) were three times more likely to take asthma medication than older children (7–18 years). ICS, in combination or not with LABA, were the most dispensed drugs among children. Children with asthma medications were almost twice as likely to receive antibiotics, more likely to end up in the emergency room, and twice as likely to be hospitalized; (4) most children took ICS, according to the GINA guidelines. High rates of nebulization in young children were observed, despite the recommendation to use an inhaler with a spacing chamber as much as possible. Finally, children who took asthma medications were more likely to end up in the ER or be hospitalized.


Author(s):  
Vanja Ljevar ◽  
James Goulding ◽  
Gavin Smith ◽  
Alexa Spence

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Amal Al Wadhahi ◽  
Loretta Garvey ◽  
Karen-Leigh Edward ◽  
Carolyn Beasley

2021 ◽  
pp. 00309-2021
Author(s):  
Caroline J. Lodge ◽  
Alice Doherty ◽  
Dinh Bui ◽  
Raisa Cassim ◽  
Adrian J. Lowe ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe relationship between asthma and COVID-19 risk is not clear and may be influenced by level of airway obstruction, asthma medication, and known COVID risk factors. We aimed to investigate COVID-19 risk in people with asthma.MethodsWe used UK Biobank data from all participants tested for SARS-CoV-2 (n=107 412 (17 979 test positive)). Baseline questions at baseline defined ever asthma and asthma medications. Baseline Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV1) was categorized into quartiles. Logistic regression modelled relationships between asthma, and asthma categories (age at onset, medications, FEV1 quartiles), and risk of SARS-CoV-2 positive test. We investigated modification by sex, ethnic group, smoking, and BMI.ResultsThere was a reduced risk of a positive test associated with with early-onset asthma (<13 years), (OR 0.91(95% CI 0.84, 0.99). This was found for early-onset asthmatics in males (OR 0·87 [95% CI: 0·78, 0·98]), non-smokers (0·87 [0·78, 0·98]), overweight/obese (0.85 [0.77, 0.93]), and non-Black participants (0·90 [0·82, 0.98]). There was increased risk amongst early onset asthmatics in the highest compared to lowest quartile of lung function (1.44 [1.05, 1.72]).ConclusionAmongst males, non-smokers, overweight/obese, and non-Black participants, having early-onset asthma was associated with lower risk of a SARS-CoV-2 positive test. We found no evidence of a protective effect from asthma medication. Early-onset asthmatics of normal weight and with better lung function may have lifestyle differences placing them at higher risk. Further research is needed to elucidate the contribution of asthma pathophysiology and different health-related behaviour, across population groups, to the observed risks.


2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (09) ◽  
pp. 381-396
Author(s):  
Aireen Wingert ◽  
Jennifer Pillay ◽  
Dorothy L Moore ◽  
Ben Vandermeer ◽  
Michele P Dyson ◽  
...  

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections are common among young children and represent a significant burden to patients, their families and the Canadian health system. Here we conduct a rapid review of the burden of RSV illness in children 24 months of age or younger. Four databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database of Clinical Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov from 2014 to 2018), grey literature and reference lists were reviewed for studies on the following: children with or without a risk factor, without prophylaxis and with lab-confirmed RSV infection. Of 29 studies identified, 10 provided within-study comparisons and few examined clinical conditions besides prematurity. For infants of 33–36 weeks gestation (wGA) versus term infants, there was low-to-moderate certainty evidence for an increase in RSV-hospitalizations (n=599,535 infants; RR 2.05 [95% CI 1.89–2.22]; 1.3 more per 100 [1.1–1.5 more]) and hospital length of stay (n=7,597 infants; mean difference 1.00 day [95% CI 0.88–1.12]). There was low-to-moderate certainty evidence of little-to-no difference for infants born at 29–32 versus 33–36 wGA for hospitalization (n=12,812 infants; RR 1.20 [95% CI 0.92–1.56]). There was low certainty evidence of increased mechanical ventilation for hospitalized infants born at 29–32 versus 33–35 wGA (n=212 infants; RR 1.58, 95% CI 0.94–2.65). Among infants born at 32–35 wGA, hospitalization for RSV in infancy may be associated with increased wheeze and asthma-medication use across six-year follow-up (RR range 1.3–1.7). Children with versus without Down syndrome may have increased hospital length of stay (n=7,206 children; mean difference 3.00 days, 95% CI 1.95–4.05; low certainty). Evidence for other within-study comparisons was of very low certainty. In summary, prematurity is associated with greater risk for RSV-hospitalization and longer hospital length of stay, and Down syndrome may be associated with longer hospital stay for RSV. Respiratory syncytial virus-hospitalization in infancy may be associated with greater wheeze and asthma-medication use in early childhood. Lack of a comparison group was a major limitation for many studies.


Author(s):  
Matthew C.H. Rohn ◽  
Danielle R. Stevens ◽  
Jenna Kanner ◽  
Carrie Nobles ◽  
Zhen Chen ◽  
...  

Objective This study aimed to assess the impact of common asthma medication regimens on asthma symptoms, exacerbations, lung function, and inflammation during pregnancy. Study Design A total of 311 women with asthma were enrolled in a prospective pregnancy cohort. Asthma medication regimen was categorized into short-acting β agonist (SABA) alone, SABA + inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), SABA + ICS + long-acting β agonist (LABA), and no asthma medications (reference). We evaluated asthma control at enrollment (< 15 weeks' gestation) and its change into trimesters 2 and 3, including per cent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%FEV1) and peak expiratory flow (%PEF), pulse oximetry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), asthma symptoms (asthma attacks/month, night symptoms/week), and severe exacerbations. Linear mixed models adjusted for site, age, race, annual income, gestational age, body mass index, and smoking, and propensity scores accounted for asthma control status at baseline. Results Women taking SABA + ICS and SABA + ICS + LABA had better first trimester %PEF (83.5% [75.7–91.3] and 84.6% [76.9–92.3], respectively) compared with women taking no asthma medications (72.7% [66.0–79.3]). Women taking SABA + ICS + LABA also experienced improvements in %FEV1 (+11.1%, p < 0.01) in the third trimester and FeNO in the second (−12.3 parts per billion [ppb], p < 0.01) and third (−11.0 ppb, p < 0.01) trimesters as compared with the trajectory of women taking no medications. SABA + ICS use was associated with increased odds of severe exacerbations in the first (odds ratio [OR]: 2.22 [1.10–4.46]) and second (OR: 3.15 [1.11–8.96]) trimesters, and SABA + ICS + LABA use in the second trimester (OR: 7.89 [2.75–21.47]). Women taking SABA alone were similar to those taking no medication. Conclusion Pregnant women taking SABA + ICS and SABA + ICS + LABA had better lung function in the first trimester. SABA + ICS + LABA was associated with improvements in lung function and inflammation across gestation. However, both the SABA + ICS and SABA + ICS + LABA groups had a higher risk of severe exacerbation during early to mid-pregnancy. Key Points


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Sandra E. Zaeh ◽  
Monica A. Lu ◽  
Kathryn V. Blake ◽  
Elizabeth Ruvalcaba ◽  
Christabelle Ayensu-Asiedu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Looijmans-van den Akker ◽  
Anouk Werkhoven ◽  
Theo Verheij

Abstract Background Despite a clear guideline for asthma medication, excessive use of short-acting β2-agonists (SABAs) is common in clinical practice. Previous research has shown that excessive use of SABAs is associated with poor asthma control. Objective This study examines current use of asthma medication in primary care and whether excessive use of SABAs is associated with exacerbations. Methods The study design was a retrospective analysis using information from electronical medical records from patients aged 18 and older of five Julius Health Centers located in Utrecht, the Netherlands, in the period of 1 July 2018 through 1 July 2019. Excessive SABA use was defined as ≥400 inhalations per year. An exacerbation was defined as an acute worsening of asthma symptoms with the need for systemic corticosteroids. Results A total of 1161 patients were included in the study. Of the patients using SABAs (n = 766), 193 (25%) overused SABAs. Among the patients with inappropriate SABA use (n = 193), 19% had an exacerbation compared with 7% of the appropriate SABA users. For patients using asthma medication the odds of having an exacerbation were 2.9 times higher if they used an inappropriate number of SABAs than if SABAs were used appropriately (odds ratio, 2.897; 95% confidence interval, 1.87–4.48). Conclusions This study shows that overuse of SABAs is still common and that it is associated with asthma exacerbations. It highlights that clinicians need to be aware of inappropriate SABA use as it is a sign of and can even contribute to poor asthma control.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document