Faculty Opinions recommendation of Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) in pediatric intensive care--a randomized controlled trial.

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Jouvet
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Ventilatory Assist

Effect of Two Bathing Methods on Physiologic Parameters in Pediatric Intensive Care

2021 ◽  
pp. 105477382110433
Author(s):  
Özgül Öz ◽  
Gülzade Uysal ◽  
Duygu Sönmez Düzkaya
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Lower Body ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Physiologic Parameters ◽  
Positive Effect

To determine the effect of traditional and disposable bed baths performed in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) on the physiologic parameters of children. This research was conducted as a randomized controlled trial with children who were monitored in the PICU. It was found that the pulse and blood pressure immediately after the bath were higher for both bath applications and was the lowest 30 minutes after the bath ( p < .05). Children who used traditional baths had a lower body temperature than those who used the disposable bed bath after bathing for the second day. Oxygen saturation averages were found that within the group to be the highest 30 minutes after bathing methods ( p < .05). Both bathing methods applied in the PICU had a positive effect on physiologic parameters. It may be recommended to regularly perform the most appropriate bathing for patients with stable hemodynamics in PICUs.

Gastric Feeding in Critically Ill Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 461-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desley Horn ◽  
Wendy Chaboyer
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Pharmacological Agents ◽  
Feeding Groups ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Gastric Feeding

• Background Provision of enteral nutrition via the gastric route is a common nursing procedure in pediatric intensive care units. Little research, however, has focused on children’s tolerance of different types of gastric feeding regimens. • Objectives To examine the relationship between 2 gastric feeding regimens, continuous and intermittent, and children’s tolerance as measured by the number of stools and prevalences of diarrhea and vomiting. • Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted in an Australian pediatric intensive care unit; 45 children were randomly assigned to either the continuous or the intermittent gastric feeding groups. Participants remained in the assigned feeding group for the duration of the study, and values of variables used to monitor patients’ tolerance were recorded. • Results Both feeding groups were similar with respect to Pediatric Index Mortality score, age, weight, sex, diagnosis, and use of pharmacological agents known to affect the gastrointestinal tract. Additionally, the 2 groups did not differ in study duration or the daily volume of administered enteral formula per kilogram of body weight. The number of stools per day and the prevalences of diarrhea and vomiting did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. • Discussion Continuous and intermittent gastric feeding regimens have similar outcomes with respect to the number of stools per day and the prevalence of diarrhea and vomiting in pediatric intensive care patients. Further gastric feeding studies and the development of enteral feeding guidelines for critically ill children are needed.

scholarly journals As-needed endotracheal suctioning protocol vs a routine endotracheal suctioning in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A randomized controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-153
Author(s):  
Gloria Lucía Lema Zuluaga ◽  
Mauricio Fenández Laverde ◽  
Ana Marverin Correa Varela ◽  
John Jairo Zuleta Tobón
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Endotracheal Suctioning ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Objective: To compare two endotracheal suctioning protocols according to morbidity, days of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), incidence of VentilatorAssociated Pneumonia (VAP) and mortality. Methods: A Pragmatic randomized controlled trial performed at University Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellin-Colombia. Fortyfive children underwent an as-needed endotracheal suctioning protocol and forty five underwent a routine endotracheal suctioning protocol. Composite primary end point was the presence of hypoxemia, arrhythmias, accidental extubation and heart arrest. A logistic function trough generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to calculate the Relative Risk for the main outcome. Results: Characteristics of patients were similar between groups. The composite primary end point was found in 22 (47%) of intervention group and 25 (55%) children of control group (RR= 0.84; 95% CI: 0.56-1.25), as well in 35 (5.8%) of 606 endotracheal suctioning performed to intervention group and 48(7.4%) of 649 performed to control group (OR= 0.80; 95% CI: 0.5-1.3). Conclusions: There were no differences between an as-needed and a routine endotracheal suctioning protocol. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01069185

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document