Faculty Opinions recommendation of Adding psychotherapy to antidepressant medication in depression and anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis.

Author(s):  
Malcolm Lader
2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pim Cuijpers ◽  
Marit Sijbrandij ◽  
Sander L. Koole ◽  
Gerhard Andersson ◽  
Aartjan T. Beekman ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pim Cuijpers ◽  
Marit Sijbrandij ◽  
Sander L. Koole ◽  
Gerhard Andersson ◽  
Aartjan T. Beekman ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 137-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Kisely ◽  
Karolina Katarzyna Alichniewicz ◽  
Emma B. Black ◽  
Dan Siskind ◽  
Geoffrey Spurling ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca A. Lever-van Milligen ◽  
Josine E. Verhoeven ◽  
Lianne Schmaal ◽  
Laura S. van Velzen ◽  
Dóra Révész ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Depressive and anxiety disorders have shown to be associated to premature or advanced biological aging and consequently to adversely impact somatic health. Treatments with antidepressant medication or running therapy are both found to be effective for many but not all patients with mood and anxiety disorders. These interventions may, however, work through different pathophysiological mechanisms and could differ in their impact on biological aging and somatic health. This study protocol describes the design of an unique intervention study that examines whether both treatments are similarly effective in reducing or reversing biological aging (primary outcome), psychiatric status, metabolic stress and neurobiological indicators (secondary outcomes). Methods The MOod Treatment with Antidepressants or Running (MOTAR) study will recruit a total of 160 patients with a current major depressive and/or anxiety disorder in a mental health care setting. Patients will receive a 16-week treatment with either antidepressant medication or running therapy (3 times/week). Patients will undergo the treatment of their preference and a subsample will be randomized (1:1) to overcome preference bias. An additional no-disease-no-treatment group of 60 healthy controls without lifetime psychopathology, will be included as comparison group for primary and secondary outcomes at baseline. Assessments are done at week 0 for patients and controls, and at week 16 and week 52 for patients only, including written questionnaires, a psychiatric and medical examination, blood, urine and saliva collection and a cycle ergometer test, to gather information about biological aging (telomere length and telomerase activity), mental health (depression and anxiety disorder characteristics), general fitness, metabolic stress-related biomarkers (inflammation, metabolic syndrome, cortisol) and genetic determinants. In addition, neurobiological alterations in brain processes will be assessed using structural and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in a subsample of at least 25 patients per treatment arm and in all controls. Discussion This intervention study aims to provide a better understanding of the impact of antidepressant medication and running therapy on biological aging, metabolic stress and neurobiological indicators in patients with depressive and anxiety disorders in order to guide a more personalized medicine treatment. Trial registration Trialregister.nl Number of identification: NTR3460, May 2012.


2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 1943-1957 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Cuijpers ◽  
T. Donker ◽  
A. van Straten ◽  
J. Li ◽  
G. Andersson

BackgroundAlthough guided self-help for depression and anxiety disorders has been examined in many studies, it is not clear whether it is equally effective as face-to-face treatments.MethodWe conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in which the effects of guided self-help on depression and anxiety were compared directly with face-to-face psychotherapies for depression and anxiety disorders. A systematic search in bibliographical databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane) resulted in 21 studies with 810 participants.ResultsThe overall effect size indicating the difference between guided self-help and face-to-face psychotherapy at post-test was d=−0.02, in favour of guided self-help. At follow-up (up to 1 year) no significant difference was found either. No significant difference was found between the drop-out rates in the two treatments formats.ConclusionsIt seems safe to conclude that guided self-help and face-to-face treatments can have comparable effects. It is time to start thinking about implementation in routine care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document