Faculty Opinions recommendation of Endoscopic and pharmacological treatment for prophylaxis against postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Author(s):  
Matthew DiMagno
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (S6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu‐Yuan Huang ◽  
Kai‐Xin Dou ◽  
Xiao‐Ling Zhong ◽  
Xue‐Ning Shen ◽  
Shi‐Dong Chen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 800-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Häggman-Henrikson ◽  
P. Alstergren ◽  
T. Davidson ◽  
E. D. Högestätt ◽  
P. Östlund ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1369-1384
Author(s):  
Gillian E. Fitzgerald ◽  
Tom O’Dwyer ◽  
David Mockler ◽  
Finbar D. O’Shea ◽  
Fiona Wilson

Author(s):  
Jasper Tromp ◽  
Wouter Ouwerkerk ◽  
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen ◽  
Hans L. Hillege ◽  
A. Mark Richards ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 188 (5) ◽  
pp. 410-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaap Wijkstra ◽  
Jeroen Lijmer ◽  
Ferdi J. Balk ◽  
John R. Geddes ◽  
Willem A. Nolen

BackgroundThe optimal pharmacological treatment of unipolar psychotic depression is uncertain.AimsTo compare the clinical effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for patients with unipolar psychotic depression.MethodSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.ResultsTen trials were included in the review. We found no evidence that the combination of an antidepressant with an antipsychotic is more effective than an antidepressant alone. This combination was statistically more effective than an antipsychotic alone.ConclusionsAntidepressant mono-therapy and adding an antipsychotic if the patient does not respond, or starting with the combination of an antidepressant and an antipsychotic, both appear to be appropriate options for patients with unipolar psychotic depression. However, clinically the balance between risks and benefits may suggest the first option should be preferred for many patients. Starting with an antipsychotic alone appears to be inadequate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document