Faculty Opinions recommendation of Molecular Profiling of Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: Initial Results from the Know Your Tumor Initiative.

Author(s):  
Jordan Berlin
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (20) ◽  
pp. 5018-5027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Pishvaian ◽  
Robert J. Bender ◽  
David Halverson ◽  
Lola Rahib ◽  
Andrew E. Hendifar ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (24) ◽  
pp. 6611-6611
Author(s):  
Ibrahim H. Sahin ◽  
Harold Elias

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. S181
Author(s):  
F Boas ◽  
A Gonzalez Aguirre ◽  
G Srimathveeravalli ◽  
L Rund ◽  
R Schwind ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lola Rahib ◽  
Anitra Engebretson ◽  
Michael J. Pishvaian ◽  
Jonathan R. Brody ◽  
William A. Hoos ◽  
...  

Pancreatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoop S. Bhutani ◽  
Irina M. Cazacu ◽  
Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri ◽  
Anirban Maitra ◽  
Michael J. Pishvaian

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4008-4008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew H. G. Katz ◽  
Qian Shi ◽  
Syed A. Ahmad ◽  
Joseph M. Herman ◽  
Robert de Wilton Marsh ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 268-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Pishvaian ◽  
Lynn Matrisian ◽  
Andrew Eugene Hendifar ◽  
Anitra Engebretson ◽  
Lola Rahib ◽  
...  

268 Background: Obtaining an adequate tissue sample for molecular profiling to guide therapy selection for patients with advanced cancers can be clinically difficult, and/or patients may not want to undergo a biopsy. There has been a growing interest in the use of BB tests, including cell free DNA (cfDNA) and exosome/circulating tumor cell based-analyses as surrogates for tumor tissue (TT) testing. Validation of BB tests in PDA is possible because > 90% of PDAs harbor KRAS mutations – thus providing a reliable “internal control.” Methods: The Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN) and Perthera initiated an IRB-approved registry trial for patients with pancreatic cancer wherein we facilitated commercially available, CLIA certified multi-Omic profiling including next generation DNA sequencing (NGS), immunohistochemistry, and phosphoproteomics on patient tumor samples. In a subset of these patients, we incorporated BB testing. Results: A KRAS mutation has been identified in 87% of KYT patients based on TT NGS in general. As of this report, 17 BB test results (cfDNA NGS) were available. In 8 patients we were able to compare the cfDNA NGS directly with TT NGS. BB testing identified a KRAS mutation in 1/8 compared to 8/8 from the tumor tissue. Of the 9/17 patients who did not have corresponding TT NGS, a KRAS mutation was found on BB testing in 3/9 samples. 4/17 BB cases overall revealed KRAS mutations, but when cases were filtered for patients with extensive metastatic disease and progressive disease at the time of blood sampling, the KRAS mutation rate increased to 2/5 overall. Actionable findings (i.e. linked to a specific therapeutic option) were identified in 6/17 cases, of which 3/17 had both an actionable mutation and a KRAS mutation. Conclusions: Although we are aware of the limitations of this study, we recommend that for patients who have biopsiable disease, a TT test should still be the gold standard for molecular profiling. For those without biopsiable disease, the KYT program presents an opportunity to determine the parameters that influence the probability of obtaining reliable molecular profiling information from a BB sample.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 430-430
Author(s):  
Deirdre Kelly ◽  
Ayelet Borgida ◽  
Sheron Perera ◽  
Robert Edward Denroche ◽  
Spring Holter ◽  
...  

430 Background: Familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) is broadly defined as kindreds with at least a pair of first-degree relatives with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). The role of DNA damage response agents, including platinum has not been well studied in this patient population. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, treatment details and clinical outcomes were analyzed in pts with FPC with advanced, unresectable or recurrent disease enrolled in the Ontario Pancreatic Cancer Study database. The primary outcome, overall survival (OS) was calculated from the initial diagnosis of advanced disease until death. 179 non-FPC patients from the COMPASS trial [NCT02750657] served as a control cohort all of whom had full molecular profiling and family history documented. OS between pts that received platinum-based therapy, and those that did not was compared using multivariable Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, sex, diagnosis year and FPC status. Interaction between FPC status and platinum was evaluated. Results: A total of 205 FPC pts were identified, 71% of pts had full germline testing and 16 (8%) had germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2. 104 (51%) were female and 101 (49%) male. Median age was 63 years (20-93) and 58 (28%) received platinum-based chemotherapy. Within the control arm (n=179), 71 (40%) were female, and 108 (60%) male; the median age was 64 years (29-84) and 106 (59%) received platinum-based therapy. In univariable analysis, median OS in pts with FPC was 16.9 months compared to 9.6 months (HR 0.46 [95% CI 0.37-0.58]). FPC patients receiving platinum had a superior median OS of 19 months compared to 15.5 months without platinum. In a multivariable analysis, both FPC (HR 0.33 [95% CI 0.21-0.51]) and receipt of platinum HR 0.53 [95% CI 0.38-0.73]) were prognostic. No interaction was seen with FPC and receipt of platinum (p=0.15). Conclusions: FPC status is prognostic but not predictive of platinum response in this study. Further molecular profiling of this unique cohort of patients will provide insights into putative predisposing germline alterations, and novel treatment strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document