Faculty Opinions recommendation of An activity-dependent determinant of synapse elimination in the mammalian brain.

Author(s):  
Masanobu Kano ◽  
Takaki Watanabe
Neuron ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Yasuda ◽  
Sivapratha Nagappan-Chettiar ◽  
Erin M. Johnson-Venkatesh ◽  
Hisashi Umemori

Neuron ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 1024-1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayasu Mikuni ◽  
Naofumi Uesaka ◽  
Hiroyuki Okuno ◽  
Hirokazu Hirai ◽  
Karl Deisseroth ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Phillip G. Nelson ◽  
Min Jia ◽  
Min-Xu Li ◽  
Rahel Gizaw ◽  
Maria A. Lanuza ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ragnhildur T. Káradóttir ◽  
Chay T. Kuo

The addition of new neurons and oligodendroglia in the postnatal and adult mammalian brain presents distinct forms of gray and white matter plasticity. Substantial effort has been devoted to understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms controlling postnatal neurogenesis and gliogenesis, revealing important parallels to principles governing the embryonic stages. While during central nervous system development, scripted temporal and spatial patterns of neural and glial progenitor proliferation and differentiation are necessary to create the nervous system architecture, it remains unclear what driving forces maintain and sustain postnatal neural stem cell (NSC) and oligodendrocyte progenitor cell (OPC) production of new neurons and glia. In recent years, neuronal activity has been identified as an important modulator of these processes. Using the distinct properties of neurotransmitter ionotropic and metabotropic channels to signal downstream cellular events, NSCs and OPCs share common features in their readout of neuronal activity patterns. Here we review the current evidence for neuronal activity-dependent control of NSC/OPC proliferation and differentiation in the postnatal brain, highlight some potential mechanisms used by the two progenitor populations, and discuss future studies that might advance these research areas further.


2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (13) ◽  
pp. 4954-4961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sho Kakizawa ◽  
Miwako Yamasaki ◽  
Masahiko Watanabe ◽  
Masanobu Kano

Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1304
Author(s):  
Garcia ◽  
Balañà ◽  
Lanuza ◽  
Tomàs ◽  
Cilleros-Mañé ◽  
...  

Background: During neuromuscular junction (NMJ) development, synapses are produced in excess. By sensing the activity-dependent release of ACh, adenosine, and neurotrophins, presynaptic receptors prompt axonal competition and loss of the unnecessary axons. The receptor action is mediated by synergistic and antagonistic relations when they couple to downstream kinases (mainly protein kinases A and C (PKA and PKC)), which phosphorylate targets involved in axonal disconnection. Here, we directly investigated the involvement of PKA subunits and PKC isoforms in synapse elimination. Methods: Selective PKA and PKC peptide modulators were applied daily to the Levator auris longus (LAL) muscle surface of P5–P8 transgenic B6.Cg-Tg (Thy1-YFP) 16 Jrs/J (and also C57BL/6J) mice, and the number of axons and the postsynaptic receptor cluster morphology were evaluated in P9 NMJ. Results: PKA (PKA-I and PKA-II isozymes) acts at the pre- and postsynaptic sites to delay both axonal elimination and nAChR cluster differentiation, PKC activity promotes both axonal loss (a cPKCβI and nPKCε isoform action), and postsynaptic nAChR cluster maturation (a possible role for PKCθ). Moreover, PKC-induced changes in axon number indirectly influence postsynaptic maturation. Conclusions: PKC and PKA have opposed actions, which suggests that changes in the balance of these kinases may play a major role in the mechanism of developmental synapse elimination.


2008 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 983-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dionysia T. Theodosis ◽  
Dominique A. Poulain ◽  
Stéphane H. R. Oliet

Observations from different brain areas have established that the adult nervous system can undergo significant experience-related structural changes throughout life. Less familiar is the notion that morphological plasticity affects not only neurons but glial cells as well. Yet there is abundant evidence showing that astrocytes, the most numerous cells in the mammalian brain, are highly mobile. Under physiological conditions as different as reproduction, sensory stimulation, and learning, they display a remarkable structural plasticity, particularly conspicuous at the level of their lamellate distal processes that normally ensheath all portions of neurons. Distal astrocytic processes can undergo morphological changes in a matter of minutes, a remodeling that modifies the geometry and diffusion properties of the extracellular space and relationships with adjacent neuronal elements, especially synapses. Astrocytes respond to neuronal activity via ion channels, neurotransmitter receptors, and transporters on their processes; they transmit information via release of neuroactive substances. Where astrocytic processes are mobile then, astrocytic-neuronal interactions become highly dynamic, a plasticity that has important functional consequences since it modifies extracellular ionic homeostasis, neurotransmission, gliotransmission, and ultimately neuronal function at the cellular and system levels. Although a complete picture of intervening cellular mechanisms is lacking, some have been identified, notably certain permissive molecular factors common to systems capable of remodeling (cell surface and extracellular matrix adhesion molecules, cytoskeletal proteins) and molecules that appear specific to each system (neuropeptides, neurotransmitters, steroids, growth factors) that trigger or reverse the morphological changes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 369 (1652) ◽  
pp. 20130504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil R. Smalheiser

If mRNAs were the only RNAs made by a neuron, there would be a simple mapping of mRNAs to proteins. However, microRNAs and other non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs; endo-siRNAs, piRNAs, BC1, BC200, antisense and long ncRNAs, repeat-related transcripts, etc.) regulate mRNAs via effects on protein translation as well as transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms. Not only are genes ON or OFF, but their ability to be translated can be turned ON or OFF at the level of synapses, supporting an enormous increase in information capacity. Here, I review evidence that ncRNAs are expressed pervasively within dendrites in mammalian brain; that some are activity-dependent and highly enriched near synapses; and that synaptic ncRNAs participate in plasticity responses including learning and memory. Ultimately, ncRNAs can be viewed as the post-it notes of the neuron. They have no literal meaning of their own, but derive their functions from where (and to what) they are stuck. This may explain, in part, why ncRNAs differ so dramatically from protein-coding genes, both in terms of the usual indicators of functionality and in terms of evolutionary constraints. ncRNAs do not appear to be direct mediators of synaptic transmission in the manner of neurotransmitters or receptors, yet they orchestrate synaptic plasticity—and may drive species-specific changes in cognition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document