Effect of Surface Treatment With Er:YAG and CO2 Lasers on Shear Bond Strength of Polyether Ether Ketone to Composite Resin Veneers

Introduction: Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) has low surface energy and high resistance to chemical surface treatments. Therefore, different surface treatments such as laser conditioning should be investigated. There is a gap of information regarding the efficacy of laser irradiation in the surface treatment of PEEK, and the efficacy of several laser types needs to be evaluated for this purpose. This study aimed to assess the effect of surface treatment with erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) and carbon dioxide (CO2) lasers on shear bond strength (SBS) of PEEK to composite resin veneers. Methods: In this experimental study, 60 rectangular-shaped PEEK samples (7 x 7 x 2 mm) were used. The samples were mounted in auto-polymerizing acrylic resin in such a way that only one surface measuring 7x7 mm remained exposed. The samples were then randomly divided into 3 groups (n=20) of control, Er:YAG laser surface treatment (Power=1.5 W, energy density=119.42 J/cm2 , irradiation time=20 s) and CO2 laser surface treatment (Power=4 W, energy density=159.22 J/cm2 , irradiation time=50 s). The bonding agent and PEEK opaque were applied on the surface of samples and they were veneered with a composite resin using a hollow plastic cylinder with an internal diameter of 4 mm. The SBS was then measured and the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD test and Dunnett’s test at 0.05 level of significance. Results: The SBS of the 3 groups was significantly different (P<0.001). The Tukey HSD test revealed that the Er:YAG laser had higher SBS than the CO2 laser group (P<0.001). The Dunnett’s test showed that both Er:YAG and CO2 laser groups yielded higher SBS than the control group (P<0.001). Conclusion: The Er:YAG and CO2 laser treatments can increase the SBS of PEEK to composite resin veneers, although the Er:YAG laser seems to be more effective for this purpose.

Download Full-text

Impact of Intracoronal Dentin Treatment Prior to Bleaching on Bond Strength of Restorative Materials

Brazilian Dental Journal ◽

10.1590/0103-6440201302441 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 25 (6) ◽

pp. 519-523 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Erica Moreno Zanconato-Carvalho ◽

João Felipe Bruniera ◽

Natália Spadini de Faria ◽

Vivian Colucci ◽

Danielle Cristine Messias

Keyword(s):

Phosphoric Acid ◽

Bond Strength ◽

Surface Treatment ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Composite Resin ◽

Er:Yag Laser ◽

Composite Resins ◽

Bleaching Procedure ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Restorative Materials

Surface treatment of dentin before the bleaching procedure may affect its permeability and influence the bond strength of restorative materials. This study evaluated the influence of surface treatment before the bleaching on shear bond strength (SBT) of restorative materials to intracoronal dentin. Dentin slabs were subjected to surface treatment: no bleaching (control - CON), no surface treatment + bleaching (HP), 37% phosphoric acid + bleaching (PA) and Er:YAG laser + bleaching (L). After the bleaching procedure, specimens (n=10) were restored with: microhybrid composite resin (MH), flowable composite resin (F), and resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC). The shear test was carried out. ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05) showed significant difference for surface treatment and restorative materials (p<0.05). CON presented higher STB and was statistically different from HP (p<0.05). PA and L showed intermediate values and were statistically similar to CON and HP (p>0.05). STB for MH and F were higher than RMGIC (p<0.05), and did not differ from each other (p>0.05). The surface treatments with phosphoric acid and Er:YAG laser before the bleaching procedure provided shear bond strength at the same level of unbleached dentin and the composite resins presented superior bond strength to the intracoronal dentin.

Download Full-text

Comparative Study of Chemical and Mechanical Surface Treatment Effects on The Shear Bond Strength of Polyether-Ether-Ketone to Veneering Resin

The International Journal of Prosthodontics ◽

10.11607/ijp.6938 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Nora Adem ◽

Burcu Bal ◽

Ender Kazazoğlu

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Comparative Study ◽

Surface Treatment ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Treatment Effects ◽

Polyether Ether Ketone ◽

Mechanical Surface Treatment ◽

Ether Ketone ◽

Mechanical Surface

Download Full-text

Effect of surface treatment and manufacturing process on the shear bond strength of veneering composite resin to polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK)

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry ◽

10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.003 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Diogo do Nascimento Machado Gouveia ◽

Michael E. Razzoog ◽

Marianella Sierraalta ◽

Maria Fernanda Alfaro

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Surface Treatment ◽

Manufacturing Process ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Composite Resin ◽

Effect Of Surface

Download Full-text

The effect of surface treatment with Er:YAG laser on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to fiber-reinforced composite

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry ◽

10.4317/jced.51613 ◽

2014 ◽

pp. e379-83 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

M Dehghani ◽

F. Ahrari

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Surface Treatment ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Er:Yag Laser ◽

Orthodontic Brackets ◽

Fiber Reinforced ◽

Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽

Reinforced Composite ◽

Effect Of Surface

Download Full-text

Effect of Surface Treatment with CO2 Laser on Bond Strength in Composite Resin Restorations

Photobiomodulation Photomedicine and Laser Surgery ◽

10.1089/photob.2018.4534 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (7) ◽

pp. 428-433

Author(s):

Pedro Henrique Cabral Oliveira ◽

Luiz Henrique Cabral Oliveira ◽

Márcia Regina Cabral ◽

André Guaraci De Vito Moraes ◽

Ricardo Sgura ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Surface Treatment ◽

Co2 Laser ◽

Composite Resin ◽

Composite Resin Restorations ◽

Effect Of Surface ◽

Resin Restorations

Download Full-text

Effect of Surface Treatment and Storage Time on Immediate Repair Bond Strength Durability of Methacrylate- and Ormocer-Based Bulk Fill Resin Composites

Applied Sciences ◽

10.3390/app10228308 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (22) ◽

pp. 8308

Author(s):

Farid S. El-Askary ◽

Sara A. Botros ◽

Mutlu Özcan

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Surface Treatment ◽

Shear Bond Strength ◽

Storage Time ◽

Strength Testing ◽

Repair System ◽

Resin Composites ◽

Oxygen Inhibition ◽

And Storage ◽

Effect Of Surface

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatment and storage time on immediate repair bond durability of methacrylate- and ormocer-based bulk fill composites. In total, 265 discs were divided into 32 groups (n = 8/group) according to: (1) Material: X-tra fil and Admira Fusion X-tra; (2) Surface treatment: oxygen inhibition; matrix; Futurabond M+; Silane/Futurabond M+; Admira Bond; Silane/Admira Bond; ceramic repair system; and Silane/Cimara bond; and (3) Storage time: 24 h and 6 months. Each disc received three micro-cylinders from the same material. Specimens were subjected to micro-shear bond strength testing either at 24 h or 6 months. Data were analyzed using ANOVA/Tukey’s test/Student t-test (p = 0.05). All experimental factors had significant effect on bond strength (p < 0.0001). Drop in bond strength was noticed in both materials after six months (p < 0.05), except for Admira Fusion X-tra treated with silane/cimara adhesive (p = 0.860). Both materials showed insignificant values with Admira bond either at 24 h or 6 months (p = 0.275 and p = 0.060, respectively). For other treatments, X-tra fil showed significantly higher values at 24 h and 6 months (p < 0.05). Ceramic repair system can be used to immediately repair both methacrylate- and ormocer-based composites.

Download Full-text