Hate Speech Problems and Citizenship Education: Focusing on the college students’ recognition and experience of hate speech

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-65
Author(s):  
Young Ju Bae
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Citizenship Education ◽  
Hate Speech

scholarly journals Citizenship, Social Change, and Education

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-109
Author(s):  
Mitja Sardoč
Keyword(s):  
Public Schools ◽  
Social Change ◽  
Citizenship Education ◽  
Hate Speech ◽  
Research Policy ◽  
Social Changes ◽  
Public Schooling ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Theory Research ◽  
Civic Space

In recent decades, discussions regarding citizenship and citizenship education have evolved from a marginal issue in political philosophy and the philosophy of education to one of the most pressing topics in contemporary discussions about the civic aims of public schooling. The place and contribution of citizenship education in public schools have become central points of discussion and debate in terms of theory, research, policy, and practice. Yet, existing conceptions of citizenship education differ considerably over various issues, including the basic motivational impulses associated with the civic aims of public education. In particular, the recent upsurge of phenomena as diverse as hate speech, populism, the shrinking civic space, radicalisation, and violent extremism have shifted the main justificatory impulse from consequentialist to urgency-based arguments. This shift of emphasis has had some unreflected consequences related to the justification for citizenship education in public schools. The central purpose of this article is to expound on the two main impulses associated with the civic aims of public schools and their interrelationship with social changes. The main part contrasts these two opposing motivational impulses associated with the justification of citizenship education. Each of the two impulses is presented and then clarified with an example to shed light on the basic justificatory procedure associated with it. The concluding part of this paper sketches the most distinctive challenges of the alternative conception of justifying citizenship education and its interplay with social change.

scholarly journals PENGARUH LITERASI TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN PEMBELAJARAN PKN

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-65
Author(s):  
Agrisa Alya Fayza ◽  
Dadi Mulyadi Nugraha ◽  
Supriyono .
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Citizenship Education ◽  
Literacy Activities ◽  
Large Influence ◽  
The Subject

This research is motivated by the low understanding of learning Citizenship Education or PKN and the low influence of literacy on learning at school or college. Students and students are still low in understanding what literacy is and how literacy activities are and what literacy affects learning at school or in college. From the results of this study, it was found that literacy has a very large influence on learning at school and in college, especially in the subject of Citizenship Education or Civics. Most of the students are aware of and know the big influence of these literacy activities, and there have been many. some of them implement it in learning at school or in college. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh rendahnya pemahaman belajar Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan atau PKN dan rendahnya pengaruh literasi terhadap pembelajaran di sekolah ataupun di perguruan tinggi. Para pelajar dan mahasiswa masih rendah dalam memahami apa itu pengertian literasi dan bagaimana kegiatan literasi serta apa pengaruh literasi terhadap pembelajaran di sekolah atau di perguruan tinggi. Dari hasil penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa literasi memiliki pengaruh yang sangat besar terhadap pembelajaran di sekolah maupun di perguruan tinggi khususnya dalam mata pelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan atau PKN, Sebagian besar para pelajar dan mahasiswa pun sudah sadar dan mengetahui pengaruh besar dari kegiatan literasi tersebut, dan sudah banyak beberapa dari mereka yang mengimplementasikannya dalam pembelajaran di sekolah ataupun di perguruan tinggi.

Lessons Learned From Coaching Postsecondary Students With Traumatic Brain Injury

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-96
Author(s):  
Mary R. T. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Sense Of Self ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Sudden Onset ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Exhaustive List

Purpose The purpose of this clinical focus article is to provide speech-language pathologists with a brief update of the evidence that provides possible explanations for our experiences while coaching college students with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Method The narrative text provides readers with lessons we learned as speech-language pathologists functioning as cognitive coaches to college students with TBI. This is not meant to be an exhaustive list, but rather to consider the recent scientific evidence that will help our understanding of how best to coach these college students. Conclusion Four lessons are described. Lesson 1 focuses on the value of self-reported responses to surveys, questionnaires, and interviews. Lesson 2 addresses the use of immediate/proximal goals as leverage for students to update their sense of self and how their abilities and disabilities may alter their more distal goals. Lesson 3 reminds us that teamwork is necessary to address the complex issues facing these students, which include their developmental stage, the sudden onset of trauma to the brain, and having to navigate going to college with a TBI. Lesson 4 focuses on the need for college students with TBI to learn how to self-advocate with instructors, family, and peers.

Effects of Physical Training on Stuttering

1968 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 767-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Don Franks ◽  
Elizabeth B. Franks
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Group Therapy ◽  
Physical Training ◽  
Cardiovascular Response ◽  
Training Group ◽  
Physical Stress ◽  
Submaximal Exercise ◽  
Endurance Running ◽  
Response To Exercise

Eight college students enrolled in group therapy for stuttering were divided into two equal groups for 20 weeks. The training group supplemented therapy with endurance running and calisthenics three days per week. The subjects were tested prior to and at the conclusion of the training on a battery of stuttering tests and cardiovascular measures taken at rest, after stuttering, and after submaximal exercise. There were no significant differences (0.05 level) prior to training. At the conclusion of training, the training group was significandy better in cardiovascular response to exercise and stuttering. Although physical training did not significantly aid the reduction of stuttering as measured in this study, training did cause an increased ability to adapt physiologically to physical stress and to the stress of stuttering.

The Effects of a Neutral Stimulus (Buzzer) on Motor Responses and Disfluencies in Normal Speakers

1969 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. Martin ◽  
Gerald M. Siegel
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Neutral Stimulus ◽  
Motor Responses ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
And Control ◽  
Speaking Task

Seventy-two college students were divided into three groups: Button Push-Speech (BP-S), Speech-Button Push (S-BP), and Control. BP-S subjects pushed one of two buttons on signal for 8 min. During the last 4 min, depression of the criterion button caused a buzzer to sound. After the button-push task, subjects spoke spontaneously for 30 min. During the last 20 min, the buzzer was presented contingent upon each disfluency. S-BP subjects were run under the same procedures, but the order of button-push and speech tasks was reversed. Control subjects followed the same procedures as S-BP subjects, but no buzzer signal was presented at any time. Both S-BP and BP-S subjects emitted significantly fewer disfluencies during the last 20 min (Conditioning) than during the first 10 min (Baserate) of the speaking task. The frequency of disfluencies for Control subjects did not change significantly from Baserate to Conditioning. In none of the three groups did the frequency of pushes on the criterion button change significantly from minute to minute throughout the 8-min button-push session.

Distinctive Phonetic Features as Relevant and Irrelevant Stimulus Dimensions in Speech-Sound Discrimination Learning

1974 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-425
Author(s):  
Stuart I. Ritterman ◽  
Nancy C. Freeman
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Discrimination Learning ◽  
Irrelevant Dimension ◽  
Speech Sound ◽  
Irrelevant Stimulus ◽  
Relevant Dimension ◽  
Phonetic Features ◽  
Sound Discrimination ◽  
Nonsense Syllables

Thirty-two college students were required to learn the relevant dimension in each of two randomized lists of auditorily presented stimuli. The stimuli consisted of seven pairs of CV nonsense syllables differing by two relevant dimension units and from zero to seven irrelevant dimension units. Stimulus dimensions were determined according to Saporta’s units of difference. No significant differences in performance as a function of number of the irrelevant dimensions nor characteristics of the relevant dimension were observed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document