scholarly journals SELECTION OF SOYBEAN F3 SEGREGANTING FAMILIES BY MULTIVARIATE MODELS

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Ricardo Carvalho ◽  
Danieli Jacoboski Hutra ◽  
Robison Davi Patias Furlan ◽  
Victor Delino Barasuol Scarton ◽  
Renan Jardel Rusch Treter ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-262
Author(s):  
Cíntia Machado de Oliveira Moulin Carias ◽  
José Henrique Soler Guilhen ◽  
Tiago de Souza Marçal ◽  
Adésio Ferreira ◽  
Marcia Flores Da Silva Ferreira

1984 ◽  
Vol 16 (01) ◽  
pp. 17-18
Author(s):  
J. W. Delleur

Most time series models in hydrology are used for river flow forecasting, for generation of synthetic data sequences or for the study of physical characteristics underlying the hydrological processes. The models are formulated as linear stochastic difference equations. Three phases are considered for the selection of a model based on a satisfactory representation of a given empirical time series: identification, estimation and validation. Several criteria have been proposed for the selection of the order of ARMA models. The Akaike information criterion (Ale) is popular among hydrologists, but the posterior probability criterion has the advantage of optimality and asymptotic consistency. There are numerous applications of AR or ARMA models to annual streamflow series which are stationary. Seasonal, monthly, weekly or daily streamflow series are cyclically stationary and generally exhibit periodicities in the mean and variance and possibly in the autocorrelation structure. Removal of the periodicity has been accomplished by fitting harmonic series or by subtracting the seasonal mean and dividing by the seasonal standard deviation, and a time series model is then fitted to the residual series. Alternatively, ARMA models with time-varying coefficients are also used. The multiplicative ARlMA model of Box and Jenkins is less frequent in hydrology because of the difficulty in the identification of the parameter structure. Multivariate models are used when river flows at different sites are considered. Parameter estimation in multivariate time series models can become cumbersome because of the dimensionality of the problem. Often the covariance matrix of the noise term is not known in advance and limited information estimates are used. Multivariate models have been used for annual and monthly series. Disaggregation models have been used to subdivide a yearly series into monthly or weekly series or to disaggregate a main river flow into tributary flows while maintaining certain space and time cross-correlations. The aggregation of monthly into yearly time series has been shown to improve the parameter estimation of the yearly series. Hydrologic time series occasionally exhibit changes in level due to natural or man-made causes such as forest fires, volcanic eruption, climatological change, urbanization etc. These situations can be treated making use of intervention analysis.


1984 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-18
Author(s):  
J. W. Delleur

Most time series models in hydrology are used for river flow forecasting, for generation of synthetic data sequences or for the study of physical characteristics underlying the hydrological processes. The models are formulated as linear stochastic difference equations. Three phases are considered for the selection of a model based on a satisfactory representation of a given empirical time series: identification, estimation and validation. Several criteria have been proposed for the selection of the order of ARMA models. The Akaike information criterion (Ale) is popular among hydrologists, but the posterior probability criterion has the advantage of optimality and asymptotic consistency. There are numerous applications of AR or ARMA models to annual streamflow series which are stationary. Seasonal, monthly, weekly or daily streamflow series are cyclically stationary and generally exhibit periodicities in the mean and variance and possibly in the autocorrelation structure. Removal of the periodicity has been accomplished by fitting harmonic series or by subtracting the seasonal mean and dividing by the seasonal standard deviation, and a time series model is then fitted to the residual series. Alternatively, ARMA models with time-varying coefficients are also used. The multiplicative ARlMA model of Box and Jenkins is less frequent in hydrology because of the difficulty in the identification of the parameter structure. Multivariate models are used when river flows at different sites are considered. Parameter estimation in multivariate time series models can become cumbersome because of the dimensionality of the problem. Often the covariance matrix of the noise term is not known in advance and limited information estimates are used. Multivariate models have been used for annual and monthly series. Disaggregation models have been used to subdivide a yearly series into monthly or weekly series or to disaggregate a main river flow into tributary flows while maintaining certain space and time cross-correlations. The aggregation of monthly into yearly time series has been shown to improve the parameter estimation of the yearly series. Hydrologic time series occasionally exhibit changes in level due to natural or man-made causes such as forest fires, volcanic eruption, climatological change, urbanization etc. These situations can be treated making use of intervention analysis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gian Domenico Iannetti ◽  
Giorgio Vallortigara

Abstract Some of the foundations of Heyes’ radical reasoning seem to be based on a fractional selection of available evidence. Using an ethological perspective, we argue against Heyes’ rapid dismissal of innate cognitive instincts. Heyes’ use of fMRI studies of literacy to claim that culture assembles pieces of mental technology seems an example of incorrect reverse inferences and overlap theories pervasive in cognitive neuroscience.


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 395-407
Author(s):  
S. Henriksen

The first question to be answered, in seeking coordinate systems for geodynamics, is: what is geodynamics? The answer is, of course, that geodynamics is that part of geophysics which is concerned with movements of the Earth, as opposed to geostatics which is the physics of the stationary Earth. But as far as we know, there is no stationary Earth – epur sic monere. So geodynamics is actually coextensive with geophysics, and coordinate systems suitable for the one should be suitable for the other. At the present time, there are not many coordinate systems, if any, that can be identified with a static Earth. Certainly the only coordinate of aeronomic (atmospheric) interest is the height, and this is usually either as geodynamic height or as pressure. In oceanology, the most important coordinate is depth, and this, like heights in the atmosphere, is expressed as metric depth from mean sea level, as geodynamic depth, or as pressure. Only for the earth do we find “static” systems in use, ana even here there is real question as to whether the systems are dynamic or static. So it would seem that our answer to the question, of what kind, of coordinate systems are we seeking, must be that we are looking for the same systems as are used in geophysics, and these systems are dynamic in nature already – that is, their definition involvestime.


1978 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 515-521
Author(s):  
W. Nicholson

SummaryA routine has been developed for the processing of the 5820 plates of the survey. The plates are measured on the automatic measuring machine, GALAXY, and the measures are subsequently processed by computer, to edit and then refer them to the SAO catalogue. A start has been made on measuring the plates, but the final selection of stars to be made is still a matter for discussion.


Author(s):  
P.J. Killingworth ◽  
M. Warren

Ultimate resolution in the scanning electron microscope is determined not only by the diameter of the incident electron beam, but by interaction of that beam with the specimen material. Generally, while minimum beam diameter diminishes with increasing voltage, due to the reduced effect of aberration component and magnetic interference, the excited volume within the sample increases with electron energy. Thus, for any given material and imaging signal, there is an optimum volt age to achieve best resolution.In the case of organic materials, which are in general of low density and electric ally non-conducting; and may in addition be susceptible to radiation and heat damage, the selection of correct operating parameters is extremely critical and is achiev ed by interative adjustment.


Author(s):  
P. M. Lowrie ◽  
W. S. Tyler

The importance of examining stained 1 to 2μ plastic sections by light microscopy has long been recognized, both for increased definition of many histologic features and for selection of specimen samples to be used in ultrastructural studies. Selection of specimens with specific orien ation relative to anatomical structures becomes of critical importance in ultrastructural investigations of organs such as the lung. The uantity of blocks necessary to locate special areas of interest by random sampling is large, however, and the method is lacking in precision. Several methods have been described for selection of specific areas for electron microscopy using light microscopic evaluation of paraffin, epoxy-infiltrated, or epoxy-embedded large blocks from which thick sections were cut. Selected areas from these thick sections were subsequently removed and re-embedded or attached to blank precasted blocks and resectioned for transmission electron microscopy (TEM).


Author(s):  
K.-H. Herrmann ◽  
D. Krahl ◽  
H.-P Rust

The high detection quantum efficiency (DQE) is the main requirement for an imagerecording system used in electron microscopy of radiation-sensitive specimens. An electronic TV system of the type shown in Fig. 1 fulfills these conditions and can be used for either analog or digital image storage and processing [1], Several sources of noise may reduce the DQE, and therefore a careful selection of various elements is imperative.The noise of target and of video amplifier can be neglected when the converter stages produce sufficient target electrons per incident primary electron. The required gain depends on the type of the tube and also on the type of the signal processing chosen. For EBS tubes, for example, it exceeds 10. The ideal case, in which all impinging electrons create uniform charge peaks at the target, is not obtainable for several reasons, and these will be discussed as they relate to a system with a scintillator, fiber-optic and photo-cathode combination as the first stage.


Author(s):  
L.E. Murr ◽  
A.B. Draper

The industrial characterization of the machinability of metals and alloys has always been a very arbitrarily defined property, subject to the selection of various reference or test materials; and the adoption of rather naive and misleading interpretations and standards. However, it seems reasonable to assume that with the present state of knowledge of materials properties, and the current theories of solid state physics, more basic guidelines for machinability characterization might be established on the basis of the residual machined microstructures. This approach was originally pursued by Draper; and our presentation here will simply reflect an exposition and extension of this research.The technique consists initially in the production of machined chips of a desired test material on a horizontal milling machine with the workpiece (specimen) mounted on a rotary table vice. A single cut of a specified depth is taken from the workpiece (0.25 in. wide) each at a new tool location.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document