Abstract
Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, represents a novel avenue for the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Despite evidence for the effectiveness of rTMS in chronic pain conditions, the clinical uptake of rTMS remains limited. One plausible reason for this discrepancy may be a lack of understanding regarding patient perceptions and their willingness to engage with rTMS. Therefore, this study aimed to explore patient perceptions of rTMS as a treatment for chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods: Using a phenomenological approach, this qualitative study utilised a semi-structured interview to explore overall knowledge, pre-conceived concerns and attitudes regarding rTMS as a treatment for chronic musculoskeletal pain. All participants had a diagnosis of chronic musculoskeletal pain, a history of seeking treatment, and no prior experience with rTMS. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Results: Majority of the participants were willing to consider the use of rTMS as a treatment option, with most having high expectations regarding the effectiveness of the treatment due to its sophisticated appearance. Acceptance to utilise rTMS was influenced by knowledge of pain, cost and travel, and the perceived sophistication of the intervention.Conclusions: This is the first qualitative study to the authors’ knowledge that explores the perception of rTMS as a treatment among people with chronic musculoskeletal pain, a key gap in the current literature. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation appears to be accepted as a treatment option amongst individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Adequate levels of funding support, accessibility and the need for medical professions to endorse the treatment are important considerations that influenced uptake. Developing targeted strategies to address these considerations may encourage use of rTMS in a clinical chronic pain setting.
Patient perceptions of an AIDET and hourly rounding program in a community hospital: Results of a qualitative study