scholarly journals Impact of Audit Firm Rotation on Audit Quality: Evidence from Bhutan

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2S3) ◽  
pp. 1410-1417
Keyword(s):  
Audit Quality ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Positive Relation ◽  
Public Companies ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Quality Evidence

This research study examines the effects of audit firm rotation on audit quality for non- financial public listed companies in Bhutan. Currently, Bhutan has only 21 companies listed on the Royal Securities Exchange of Bhutan Limited (RSEBL). Secondary data obtained for the period of 10 years, between 2009 to 2018, were analyzed using regression analysis. Abnormal Working Capitals Accruals (AWCA) has been used as proxy for audit quality. The study concludes that audit firm rotation has an insignificant but positive relation with AWCA. Thus, in Bhutan audit firm rotation does not affect audit quality for non-financial public companies, which are in tune with prior studies. Further, it was observed that there is an insignificant relation between AWCA and all control variables with the exception of growth. Growth has a decreasing trend at the rate of -0.13 percent while the trend analysis of AWCA shows that audit quality of non-financial public listed companies has been increasing at the rate of 21.01 percent which is an indirect evidence of low audit quality

scholarly journals The The Effect of Audit Firm Age and Audit Tenure on Audit Quality (An Empirical Study on Trusted Company Awardees Listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange 2011-2016)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1293-1314
Author(s):  
Judith Gallena Sinaga ◽  
VICTOR C. SINAGA
Keyword(s):  
Audit Quality ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Firm Age ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Public Companies ◽  
Quality Audit ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
The Government

INTRODUCTION: Indonesia’s go public companies are the backbones of its economy.  As of January 2019, there are 620 listed companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange. The Indonesian Institute for Corporate Directorship yearly acknowledges listed companies and gives award categorized as the most trusted, trusted and fairly trusted companies every year.  This study aimed to explain the effect of audit firm age and audit tenure on audit quality for the trusted company awardees from 2011-2016.    METHOD: An explantory method is used in this study since it depicts the cause and effect relationship.  Data gathered will be processed,analyzed, presented, interpreted and concluded in a way that it will clarifies the matters about audit firm age and audit tenure on audit quality. There were 36 firm year observation as sample which was derived the companies that were awarded for six consecutive years.  A multivariate analysis was used in processing and analyzing the secondary data.    RESULTS: The findings partially showed that audit firm age has no significant effect on audit quality while audit tenure showed that there is a significant effect on audit quality.  In addition to the findings mentioned, it simultaneously showed that audit firm age and audit tenure on audit quality.       DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION: When the two variables are combined it affects the audit quality.  This means that the two variables, audit firm age and audit tenure should go hand in hand together in achieving audit quality.   Audit firm age, although not significant, must be taken into consideration.  The longer the firm, it is expected to increase audit quality.  Audit tenure has to do with objectivity in which it will lead to audit quality.  Long tenure is avoided by following the government regulations.  As much as possible, in every audit engagement, audit work must appear to be very objective, unbiased, and impartial thus resulting to high audit quality.  As for recommendation, researcher must add more samples in order to be more representative.  Also, other variables may be taken into consideration as a proxy for audit quality.     Keywords: Indonesian Institute for Corporate Directorship, most trusted, audit firm age, audit tenure  

scholarly journals Does audit firm size contribute to audit quality? Evidence from two emerging markets

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen-Chin Wang ◽  
Fan-Hua Kung ◽  
Kai-Hsun Lin
Keyword(s):  
Emerging Markets ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Information Asymmetry ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Discretionary Accruals ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Bid Ask Spread ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
Quality Evidence

This study investigated whether the Big N audit firms in emerging markets can provide audits of high quality and mitigate information risk, by comparing the audit quality of Big N audit firms in Taiwan with those in China. The two countries share a similar cultural background and engage in frequent economic exchange; however, they have different legal systems and institutional environments. This study followed previous research in the use of bid-ask spread and discretionary accruals as proxy variables for information asymmetry and audit quality. Our results indicate that politico-economic differences between Taiwan and China influence the effectiveness of independent auditors when it comes to the mitigation of information asymmetry. Big N audit firms in Taiwan helped to mitigate information asymmetry and provided audit services of higher quality, whereas Big N firms in China were better able to constrain earnings management. Our results indicate that market concentration and market share have a stronger influence on reputation incentive and audit quality than does the size of an audit firm.

scholarly journals ECONOMETRIC APPRAISAL OF AUDITORS’ INDEPENDENT CHARACTERISTICS AND AUDIT QUALITY OF DEPOSIT MONEY BANKS IN NIGERIA

2015 ◽  
pp. 66-81
Author(s):  
Sabo Ahmed ◽  
Alfred Kwanti
Keyword(s):  
Audit Quality ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Financial Reports ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
Audit Reports

The study examines the characteristics of auditor’s independence on audit quality of Deposit Money Banks (DMBs) listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) from 2010 to 2019. A sample size of seven Deposit Money Banks was selected using the purposive sampling technique. The study used secondary data, sourced from the audited annual financial reports of the sampled banks. The analysis of the data was done using descriptive statistics, correlation matrix, and panel regression technique. The findings reveal that audit independence and audit firm rotation are positively related to audit quality, whereas audit firm tenure relates negatively to audit quality. The relationship between audit fees and audit quality is positively insignificant. The study recommends that audit firms are to be rotated after three years of service so as to avoid over-familiarity that may jeopardize the quality of audit reports. Also, the regulatory bodies should commence the enforcement of the three years audit tenure requirement proposed by stakeholders to forestall lengthy auditor/client relationship.

An Empirical Investigation of IPO Underpricing and the Change to the LLP Organization of Audit Firms

2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven R. Muzatko ◽  
Karla M. Johnstone ◽  
Brian W. Mayhew ◽  
Larry E. Rittenberg
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Litigation Risk ◽  
Ipo Underpricing ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
Public Offering

This paper examines the relationship between the 1994 change in audit firm legal structure from general partnerships to limited liability partnerships (LLPs) on underpricing in the initial public offering (IPO) market. The change in legal structure of audit firms reduces an audit firm's wealth at risk from litigation damages and reduces the incentives for intrafirm monitoring by partners within an audit firm. Prior research suggests that underpricing protects underwriters from litigation damages, and that the level of underpricing varies inversely with both the amount of implicit insurance provided by the audit firm and the quality of the audit services provided. We hypothesize the change in audit firm legal structure reduced the assets available from audit firms in IPO-related litigation and indirectly reduced audit quality by lowering intrafirm monitoring. As a result, underwriters have incentives as a joint and several defendant with the audit firms to increase IPO underpricing, particularly for high-litigation-risk IPOs, following audit firms' shifts to LLP status. Our findings are consistent with this hypothesis.

The Auditor as a Determining Factor on Derivative Financial Instrument Disclosures

2019 ◽  
pp. 70-93
Author(s):  
Kátia Lemos ◽  
Sara Serra ◽  
Amidel Barros
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Financial Instruments ◽  
Financial Instrument ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Academic Literature ◽  
Number Of Factors ◽  
Determining Factor

Based on the premise that the quality of the audit is related to the quality of the financial reporting, the purpose of this chapter is to verify if the audit is a determining factor in derivative financial instruments disclosures. However, the academic literature has revealed that audit quality is influenced by a number of factors, such as gender, experience, and auditor's fees, as well as the type of audit firm (Big4 or not Big4). In order to achieve the proposed objective, a disclosure index was prepared, based on the requirements of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), applied to companies listed on Euronext Lisbon, excluding the sports corporations. The results revealed that the level of disclosure is influenced by the size of the audited company and by the auditor's gender, being greater in the larger companies and in the companies audited by a male auditor.

Audit Firm Tenure and Audit Quality: Evidence from U.S. Firms

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Zheng Brooks ◽  
C.S. Agnes Cheng ◽  
Kenneth J. Reichelt
Keyword(s):  
Audit Quality ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Quality Evidence

scholarly journals Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation for Listed Companies: The Effects in the Netherlands

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 937-966
Author(s):  
Bas de Jong ◽  
Steven Hijink ◽  
Lars in ’t Veld
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
First Year ◽  
Financial Reports ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation

AbstractThe Audit Regulation was adopted in 2014 to address many of the perceived failings in the market for statutory audits. It introduced mandatory audit firm rotation for public-interest entities, including listed companies, as of 17 June 2020/2023. Mandatory audit firm rotation was also considered by the Dutch legislator in 2012. Therefore, many Dutch listed companies had already switched audit firm in anticipation of the national requirement. In this article, we investigate the effects of mandatory audit firm rotation in the Netherlands by examining the financial reports of Dutch listed firms over the financial years 2012–2016 and by conducting a survey among stakeholders. We conclude that there is broad support for mandatory audit firm rotation in the Netherlands. Although mandatory audit firm rotation was seen as controversial at the time of adoption, it is now considered desirable by various stakeholders, including auditors themselves. However, mandatory audit firm rotation appears to have had some adverse effects. Most notably, our study shows a higher probability of errors in first year audits. The discount in audit fees provided by audit firms to lucrative larger public-interest entities for first year audits—the trophy client effect—may exacerbate the negative effect on audit quality. The Audit Regulation’s goals to improve the market for statutory audits have not been met so far.

Audit Partner Tenure and Audit Planning and Pricing

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean C. Bedard ◽  
Karla M. Johnstone
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Internal Controls ◽  
First Year ◽  
Public Companies ◽  
Audit Opinion ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Audit Planning ◽  
Sarbanes Oxley ◽  
Client Knowledge

SUMMARY: This paper investigates the association between audit engagement partner tenure and audit planning and pricing. Prior archival research from countries requiring partner signature on the audit opinion provides mixed results on the implications of partner tenure for audit quality. While variation in audit quality based on partner tenure implies some difference in the conduct of the engagement, prior research has not yet addressed whether engagement processes differ based on partner tenure. Using proprietary data from a large audit firm, we find that planned engagement effort increases following partner rotation, suggesting that new partners invest effort to gain client knowledge in the first year on the engagement. We also examine planned realization rates, finding them to be lower following partner rotation. This implies that new partners’ investments in client knowledge are not compensated by clients. We also find higher planned realization rates on audits having the same engagement partner for more than five years, a longer tenure than is now allowed for public companies following the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We obtain these results while controlling for client risks that affect audit planning and pricing, including those related to financial reporting, management integrity, and internal controls.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document