scholarly journals Effects of craniosacral therapy and sensorimotor training on pain, disability, depression and quality of life of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cobra Ghasemi ◽  
Ali Amiri ◽  
Javad Sarrafzadeh ◽  
Mehdi Dadgoo
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Sensorimotor Training ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Craniosacral Therapy ◽  
Sf 36

Background: Craniosacral therapy (CST) and sensorimotor training (SMT) are two recommended interventions for nonspecific chronic low back pain (NCLBP). This study compares the effects of CST and SMT on pain, functional disability, depression and quality of life in patients with NCLBP. Methodology: A total of 31 patients with NCLBP were randomly assigned to the CST group (n=16) and SMT (n=15). The study patients received 10 sessions of interventions during 5 weeks. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires were used at baseline (before the treatment), after the treatment, and 2 months after the last intervention session. Results were compared and analyzed statistically. Results: Both groups showed significant improvement from baseline to after treatment (p < 0.05). In the CST group, this improvement continued during the follow-up period in all outcomes (p < 0.05), except role emotional domain of SF-36. In the SMT group, VAS, ODI and BDI-II increased during follow-up. Also, all domains of SF-36 decreased over this period. Results of group analysis indicate a significant difference between groups at the end of treatment phase (p < 0.05), except social functioning. Conclusions: Results of our research confirm that 10 sessions of craniosacral therapy (CST) or sensorimotor training (SMT) can significantly control pain, disability, depression, and quality of life in patients with NCLBP; but the efficacy of CST is significantly better than SMT. Key words: Craniosacral therapy; Sensorimotor training; Nonspecific chronic low back pain; Quality of life Citation: Ghasemi C, Amiri A, Sarrafzadeh J, Dadgoo M. Effects of craniosacral therapy and sensorimotor training on pain, disability, depression and quality of life of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;25(2):189-198. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v25i2.1458 Abbreviations: CST=Craniosacral therapy; SMT=Sensorimotor training; NCLBP=Nonspecific chronic low back pain; VAS=Visual analogue scale; ODI=Oswestry disability index, BDI-II=Beck depression inventory-II, and SF-36=Short Form-36; CSF=cerebral spinal fluid; CSS=craniosacral system; PRM=primary respiratory movements Received: 27 June 2020, Reviewed: 24 July 2020, Accepted: 27 July 2020

Quality of life of osteoporotic patients attending rheumatology rehabilitation in-patient units

2012 ◽  
Vol 153 (33) ◽  
pp. 1314-1319
Author(s):  
Julianna Rozália Sallai ◽  
Gábor Héjj ◽  
István †Ratkó ◽  
Aniella Hunka ◽  
Ilona Márkus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Life Data ◽  
Sf 36

There has been no report on demographic, social and quality of life data of osteoporotic patients attending rheumatology rehabilitation in-patient units in Hungary. Aim: The authors analyzed the data of osteoporotic patients treated in rheumatology rehabilitation departments as in-patients in four hospitals in Hungary. Methods: Demographic and social data were obtained by using a questionnaire developed by the authors, and quality of life was assessed with the use of the SF-36 questionnaire. The quality of life data of osteoporotic patients were compared to that obtained from patients with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthrosis and chronic low back pain who were treated in the same department at the same time. Results: Of the 253 patients who were asked to participate in the study, 211 patients filled out the questionnaires. 25.6% of the patients were male. 58% of the patients were younger than 60 years of age, and 40% of them were heavy physical workers earlier. More than 50% of the patients did not complete secondary school education, and only 6.7% of the patients had a per capita monthly income higher than 100 000 HUF. The quality of life of the osteoporotic patients assessed by SF-36 scored 34.7, which was significantly lower than that of the mean of the Hungarian population scoring 70–90. The SF-36 scores of osteoporotic patients were lower in all domains compared to the scores of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and low back pain, although the difference was significant only in the domain of physical activity. The affective role of patients with osteoporosis was significantly lower than those with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Conclusions: Osteoporotic patients attending in-patient rheumatology in-patient rehabilitation units in Hungary have poor quality of life comparable, even worse than that found in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain. Orv. Hetil., 2012, 153, 1314–1319.

scholarly journals A cross-sectional study of associations between kinesiophobia, pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain

2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Josielli Comachio ◽  
Mauricio Oliveira Magalhães ◽  
Ana Paula de Moura Campos Carvalho e Silva ◽  
Amélia Pasqual Marques
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pain Disability

scholarly journals Deep-water running training at moderate intensity and high intensity improves pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-35
Author(s):  
AC Kanitz ◽  
B Machado ◽  
D Rodrigues ◽  
G Zambelli ◽  
A Ivaniski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Deep Water ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Running Training ◽  
Pain Disability

Objective: The present study aimed to verify the influence of training intensity in the aquatic environment on pain, disability, physical capacity, and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain. Design/Setting: A randomized clinical trial. Subjects: Twenty-two patients with chronic low back pain of both sexes (13 women and 9 men) participated in the study. Material and method: One group performed deep-water walking/running training at moderate intensity (MIT) and a second group performed deep-water walking/running training at high intensity (HIT). Pain, disability, peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), and quality of life were assessed before and after an intervention. Results: Decreases in pain and disability were observed within both groups, without differences in these parameters between training groups. VO2peak did not change in either group after the training intervention. The results of the HIT group showed more significant improvements in quality of life than that of the MIT group, highlighting the social domain, psychological domain, and general quality of life. Both groups presented significant improvements in the physical and environmental domains of quality of life. Conclusions: Deep-water aerobic exercise training seems to be effective for improving pain symptoms and reducing the disability of people with chronic low back pain. These improvements seem to be independent of the intensity at which the training is performed. In addition, improving pain and disability does not directly reflect all areas of quality of life. In this case, the group that performed the intervention at high intensity achieved more significant improvements in quality of life.

469 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PAIN, DISABILITY, DISTRESS AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN: THE ROLE OF ASSESSMENT TIME

2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Scholich ◽  
D. Hallner ◽  
R. Wittenberg ◽  
A.C. Rusu ◽  
M.I. Hasenbring
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Assessment Time

Comparison of the effects of craniosacral therapy, muscle energy technique, and sensorimotor training on non-specific chronic low back pain

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cobra Ghasemi ◽  
Ali Amiri ◽  
Javad Sarrafzadeh ◽  
Mehdi Dadgoo ◽  
Nader Maroufi
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Sensorimotor Training ◽  
Muscle Energy Technique ◽  
Craniosacral Therapy ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Muscle Energy

Background and objectives: The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of craniosacral therapy (CST), muscle energy technique (MET), and sensorimotor training (SMT) on pain, disability, depression, and quality of life of patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (NCLBP). Methodology: In this randomized clinical trial study 45 patients with NCLBP were randomly divided in three groups including CST, SMT, and MET. All groups received 10 sessions CST, SMT, and MET training in 5 weeks. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry functional disability questionnaire (ODQ), Beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II), and 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) were used to evaluate the pain, disability, depression, and quality of life, respectively, in three times, before treatment, after the last session of treatment, and after 2 months follow up.  Results: The Results showed that VAS, ODI, BDI, and SF-36 changes were significant in the groups SMT, CST and MET (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001). The VAS, ODI, BDI, and SF-36 changes in post-treatment and follow-up times in the CST group were significantly different in comparison to SMT group, and the changes in VAS, ODI, BDI, and SF-36 at after treatment and follow-up times in the MET group compared with the CST group had a significant difference (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Craniosacral therapy, muscle energy technique, and sensorimotor training were all effective in improvement of pain, depression, functional disability, and quality of life of patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. Craniosacral therapy is more effective than muscle energy technique, and sensorimotor training in post-treatment and follow up. The effect of craniosacral therapy was continuous after two months follow up. Keywords: Low Back Pain; Craniosacral Therapy; Muscle Energy Technique; Sensorimotor Training Abbreviations: CST - Craniosacral therapy; MET - Muscle energy technique; SMT - Sensorimotor training; NCLBP - Non-specific chronic low back pain; ODQ - Oswestry functional disability questionnaire; 36-SF - 36-item short form health survey; BDI - Beck depression inventory; ROM - Range of motion Citation: Ghasemi C, Amiri A, Sarrafzadeh J, Dadgoo M, Maroufi N. Comparison of the effects of craniosacral therapy, muscle energy technique, and sensorimotor training on non-specific chronic low back pain Received: 21 July 2020, Reviewed: 14 August 2020, Revised: 15 August 2020, Accepted: 15 August 2020

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document