scholarly journals Understanding the Essence of the Accrual Method According to the International Standards

Author(s):  
Bidzina Grigalashvili ◽  

Assumption of international accounting standards was considerable event in the accounting practice of Georgia. One of the innovation was the introduction of "accounting policy" and establishment such an element in the compilation of financial statements as "accrual method". Mentioned method was not used in Soviet accounting. Based on his explanation, after the introduction of international standards, the definitions have undergone some changes. The article analyzes the implemented changes, definitions, given in international standards and conceptual frameworks, outlook of various authors concerning subject matter and relevant conclusions drawn. Based on researches have been proven that, the "accrual method" should be used by the enterprise in recognizing / reflecting income and expenses and not in relation to assets and liabilities. Based on the reconciliation and analysis of different definitions, the author's designation of the "accrual method" is proposed.

Author(s):  
Bidzina Grigalashvili ◽  

Assumption of international accounting standards was considerable event in the accounting practice of Georgia. One of the innovation was the introduction of "accounting policy" and establishment such an element in the compilation of financial statements as "accrual method". Mentioned method was not used in Soviet accounting. Based on his explanation, after the introduction of international standards, the definitions have undergone some changes. The article analyzes the implemented changes, definitions, given in international standards and conceptual frameworks, outlook of various authors concerning subject matter and relevant conclusions drawn. Based on researches have been proven that, the "accrual method" should be used by the enterprise in recognizing / reflecting income and expenses and not in relation to assets and liabilities. Based on the reconciliation and analysis of different definitions, the author's designation of the "accrual method" is proposed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Ahmad Adel Jamil Abdallah

The present study aimed to measuring the conformity level of income tax accounting in Jordan with the requirements of ISA (12), and because of increasing to apply the international standards by local and foreign companies in Jordan and Jordanian legislations it’s appear gap between the accounting profit and the tax profit caused Taxable temporary and permanent differences. The study seeks to achieve set of goals represented by studying and analyzing the   compatibility level of income tax accounting by a questionnaire was distributed to 100 income and sales auditors working in the senior and moderate Taxpayers, directorates 85 questionnaires were retrieved and eighty were valid for the study’s purposes, the major results that is the study found the income tax accounting in Jordan does not adhere to the requirements of most of the international accounting standards as there were no presentation to the financial statements, and There was no recognition of Taxable temporary differences and deductible temporary differences (the differences between accounting profit and taxable profit) in the income tax accounting in Jordan.


2008 ◽  
Vol 53 (No. 10) ◽  
pp. 466-474
Author(s):  
P. Svoboda

The valuation of assets is a relatively challenging activity as well as a scientific discipline having an impact on the amount of the reported assets and economic result process. The report deals with the issue of valuation of the tangible fixed assets in the accounting entities compiling the financial statements pursuant to the Czech national legislation and in conformity with the requirements of the International Accounting Standards IAS/IFRS and US GAAP. The substantial differences in the definitions and valuation of the tangible fixed assets in these systems have been determined, indicating the impact on the economy of the accounting entity, both at the primary acquisition and as at the day of the closing of books. Attention has also been paid to the possibilities of recording the value decreases and to subsequent expenses. The analysis of legal regulations was completed with the analysis of the financial statements from selected economic entities. As per the international standards, the main difference consists in the possibility of component depreciation of tangible assets or, on the other hand, the possibility of group depreciation, in the differences in valuation in the event of acquisition paid for and of acquisition by one’s own production and in the possibility to consider the costs of disposal of assets. The subsequent expenses are also construed in a different manner: as per the Czech regulation, they are construed as repairs and maintenance. The substantial difference in comparison with the Czech regulation consists in the possibility of re-valuation of assets upwards as well as the method of actual value determination.


2020 ◽  
Vol 384 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-118
Author(s):  
Y. E. Putihin ◽  
Y. N. Akimova ◽  
N. V. Ostrovskaya ◽  
I. A. Manvelova ◽  
E. V. Negashev

International Accounting Practice Accounting is multifaceted and heterogeneous. First distinguish between international standards and national standards. National accounting standards for each country is being developed independently. The leading countries in the field of national accounting standards are the United Kingdom and the United States, which is determined by the role of these countries in international financial markets. In different countries, national accounting standards are called differently; in addition, various bodies are involved in their development: in some these are state bodies, in other countries professional organizations. International accounting standards are implemented and developed at 2 levels: international, global and regional. In the regional aspect, the main role belongs to the EU Accounting Commission, which regulates these matters in the EU countries. World standards are developed by several organizations: International Federation of Accountants, Committee on International Accounting Standards, Intergovernmental Group of Experts on International Standards Reporting and Accounting Center for Transnational United Nations Corporation, Economic development and cooperation. There is a great variety of accounting systems around the world. The differences between them are explained mainly by the different business environments in which they operate. Among many classifications, which are based on various principles, two main classifications can be distinguished. The first one is based on the “geographical” principle, i.e.: the UK-US system, the Continental system, the Latin American system. In the second classification, systems are clustered based on their typical properties and hierarchy. The upper level defines the objectives that the accounting system focuses on. Next, systems are rated based on whether the state insists on applying the theoretical approach or the actual legislative requirements and business needs. It might be difficult to classify a system as belonging to a specific group if the country’s accounting system is unstable. Thus, in the 60s of the 20th century, New Zealand started to separate from the UK, although many provisions of its accounting system were taken directly from the standards developed by the English Institute of Financial Accountants. In view of the existing challenges and various approaches to the classification of national accounting systems, the importance of such classification can hardly be overestimated. The proximity of national accounting systems in countries that belong to the same model suggests the possibility of harmonization of accounting principles at the international level. Based on the above: - the possibility of grouping national accounting systems into clusters makes it possible to level out the differences between them during standardization; - the convergence of economies of different countries due to the globalization of the world economy contributes to the unification of accounting principles at the global level.


2013 ◽  
Vol 87 (9) ◽  
pp. 355-364
Author(s):  
Dick Van Offeren ◽  
Joop Witjes ◽  
Tim Verdoes

De International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) heeft recent het conceptual framework-project als kernproject aangemerkt. Het oorspronkelijke Framework for the preparation and presentation of financial statements (framework 1989) was aan een fundamentele herziening toe. Samen met de Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) heeft de IASB de eerste fase van het Conceptual framework for financial reporting (framework 2010) voltooid. In deze eerste fase worden twee onderwerpen besproken. Dit zijn het doel van financiële verslaggeving en de kwalitatieve kenmerken van financiële verslaggeving. Wij bespreken deze twee onderwerpen en gaan in op de verschillen tussen het framework 2010 en het framework 1989. Wij benadrukken het verschil in toepassingsgebied van de twee frameworks. Het framework 2010 is gericht op het ruimere begrip financial reporting, financiële verslaggeving en het framework 1989 was beperkt tot financial statements, jaarrekeningen.


Author(s):  
Veronica Paz ◽  
Thomas Griffin

The purpose of this research is to determine the impact of material differences in the conceptual framework of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) on the financial statements.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlozar Stefanov ◽  

This report attempts to address the issues of valuation, presentation and disclosure of land as an investment property within the meaning of International Accounting Standards. Emphasis is placed on the criteria for classifying land as investment property, as well as the questions for the initial and subsequent valuation of these properties. Due attention was also paid to the disclosure of investment property in the notes to the financial statements.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 206
Author(s):  
Rashidi Astaneh Milad

This article considers the comparative comparison of Iran's accounting standards and international accounting standards till 2014 and studies the accomplished changes after IASB and FASB cooperation. The purpose of this research is to collect the information for researchers in order to help to increase more convergence between Iran's accounting standards and international standards. After comparison of standards, the questionnaires were distributed among accountants community in Iran and they were analyzed by using of Chi-square test. The results indicate that for more convergence, seventeen standards of Iran's accounting standards should be reviewed by standards compilation committee.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document