MORPHOMETRY OF LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC WEDGE ANGLE, DISC HEIGHT AND CONCAVITY INDEX IN NORMAL SPINES

2021 ◽  
pp. 32-34
Author(s):  
Kalpana Chhetri

BACKGROUND: The lordotic wedging and height of the presacral disc avert detrimental loads and shearing of the lumbar spine. Age and functional degenerations affect these causing spinal disarrays frequently requiring lumbar reconstructive surgery. Reinstating the disc height and wedging to its optimum healthy state is essential for accomplished spinal rehabilitation. The fourth and fth lumbar segments being most predisposed to mechanical pathophysiology and surgical interventions were evaluated in a north-east Indian population. MATERIALS & METHOD: The disc wedge angle, vertebral and disc heights and concavity index were measured in eighty lumbar segments comprising of twenty males and twenty females. RESULTS: The disc-wedge angle, anterior, middle, posterior disc heights and concavity index were as follows: 12.06±1.67°, 12.27±1.25mm,10.83±1.04mm,6.95±0.77mm,0.90±0.01at L4/L5 and 15.65±1.83°, 15.15±1.67mm, 11.32±1.68mm, 6.79±0.79mm, 0.90±0.01 at L5/S1 in males and 13.02±1.66°, 13.03±1.30mm, 11.86±1.23mm, 6.44±0.95mm,0.90±0.01 at L4/L5 and 16.89±1.71°,36.40 ±1.29mm, 16.04± 1.62mm, 12.31± 1.77mm, 6.06±0.94mm and 0.088 ± 0.02 in females. CONCLUSION: The disc wedge angles and anterior and middle disc heights were signicantly higher in females while the vertebral and posterior disc heights and convexity index were larger in males. The larger lordotic wedging of L5/S1 intervertebral disc preserves the spinal conformation. All above dimensions decreased with age in both genders. Our study standardizes quantitative referral data for research, diagnosis and prothesis to resolve the existing discordances.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-66
Author(s):  
Brij Kumar ◽  
Nilotpol Kashyap ◽  
Khushnud Alam ◽  
Pabitra Mandal ◽  
Swargajyoti Das ◽  
...  

: In prosthodontics, esthetics a combination of the art and science. Patients requiring complete dentures usually expect comfort first, followed by harmonious appearance, and lastly efficiency. Therefore, the correct selection of the artificial teeth is essential for achieving a pleasant esthetic outcome. A number of soft tissue landmarks have been purported as useful for anterior tooth selection; but these are easily affected by several factors such as aging and the weight and build of the person. In the present study hard tissue landmarks like pterygomaxillary notches and maxillary arch width was presented as alternative anatomical landmark for anterior teeth selection. The aim of the study was to evaluate the hamular width and inter maxillary arch width which could be the guide for the selection ofartificial teeth for complete maxillary denture in the North-East Indian population.The study was conducted on 100 dentate individuals from the North Eastern Indian population, between the age group of 18- 30 years. All measurements were done with digital calliper on cast obtained after impression with irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.Pearson correlation analysis showed, statistically significant correlation between maxillary archwidth and central incisor width. The result was significant at p<0.05 but not high enough to be practically used. Correlation between hamular width and central incisor width was found to be insignificant. The value of R was 0.05435. The result was significant at p < 0.05. The maxillary arch width was in direct proportion to the maxillary central incisor width which meant that the increase of maxillary arch width,there was a corresponding increase of maxillary central incisor width. Significant correlation was found between maxillary arch width and central incisor width with p value=0132. The result was significant at p<0.05 but not high enough to be practically used. But In this study statistically insignificant correlation was found between hamular width and central incisor width.


Author(s):  
Das Hirak ◽  
Kusre Giriraj ◽  
Shankarishan Priyanka ◽  
Nirmolia Tulika ◽  
Panyang Rita ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
GUNNAR B. J. ANDERSSON ◽  
ALBERT SCHULTZ ◽  
ARNOLD NATHAN ◽  
LARS IRSTAM

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (S6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Purnali Nath Barbhuiya ◽  
Anannya Gogoi ◽  
Giasuddin Ahmed ◽  
Rita Mahanta

2019 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. 390
Author(s):  
Sofia Banu ◽  
Purabi Sarkar ◽  
Ananya Bhowmick ◽  
ManashP Baruah ◽  
Sahana Bhattacharjee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document