scholarly journals A CLINICAL COMPARISON OF 0.75% ISOBARIC ROPIVACAINE WITH 0.5% ISOBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK FOR UPPER LIMB SURGERIES

2020 ◽  
pp. 43-46
Author(s):  
Kalyan Sarma ◽  
Bandana Mahanta ◽  
Prabir Pranjal Das

Background: Regional anaesthesia and analgesia, has the potential to provide excellent operating conditions along with better and prolonged post-operative with pain relief with fewer side effects. As a result, it is becoming increasingly popular for ambulatory anaesthesia and for day care patients.. Among the commonly used local anaesthetics, lignocaine and bupivacaine, bupivacaine has significant cardiovascular and central nervous system toxicity. In addition, bupivacaine also has lesser differentiation between sensory and motor blockade post-operatively. Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine were developed to avoid the bupivacaine related toxicities. The clinical safety profile of ropivacaine seems to be more favourable than that of levobupivacaine. With this background the following study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of ropivacaine 0.75% for brachial plexus block in upper limb surgeries and its clinical comparison with bupivacaine 0.5%. Aims and Objectives: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of ropivacaine 0.75% and bupivacaine 0.5% as potential agents for brachial plexus block for surgeries of the upper limb around and below the elbow. Settings and Design: prospective, comparative, randomized, single blinded clinical trial. Materials and Methods: After institutional ethical committee approval, 100 patients physical status ASA I & II, of either sex, between 18-60 years, weighing between 40-60 kgs posted for upper limb surgeries around the elbow, forearm and hand were divide into two groups of 50 patients each. Group R (Ropivacaine group) received 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine 30 ml in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Group B (Bupivacaine group) received 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine 30 ml in supraclavicular brachial plexus block by using peripheral nerve stimulator. Vitals, sensory, motor and analgesia score at pre-defined intervals intra-operatively were noted. Onset of analgesia, sensory & motor blockade, total duration of post-operative pain relief (VAS ≥ 5) and time of demand of first rescue analgesic were also noted along with any intra-operative complications, if any. Statistical Analysis: All the results were expressed as Mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using Unpaired Student’s t-Test. Statistical significance was considered with a p value of ≤ 0.05. Results: Demographic profile and duration of surgery were comparable among the two groups. The mean time of onset of sensory block, onset of motor block and onset of analgesia were significant (p<0.05) in group R as compared to group B. The mean duration of sensory block and duration of post-operative analgesia were comparable between the two groups. However, the mean duration of motor block was significantly lower (p<0.05) in group R as compared to group B. the baseline hemodynamic variables and requirement of first analgesic dose and other adverse events were equivalent in both the group. Conclusion: Ropivacaine when compared with Bupivacaine, has faster onset of analgesia, sensory & motor blockade, significantly lesser duration of motor blockade. Ropivacaine also provides satisfactory post-operative analgesia with a stable hemodynamic profile similar to Bupivacaine with no undue adverse effects.

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ibrahim Khamis ◽  
Ahmed Saeed Mohamed ◽  
Hesham Mohamed El Azazy ◽  
Hala Salah El Ozairy ◽  
Mohamed Moien Mohamed

Abstract Background Brachial plexus block has substituted general anesthesia in the majority of patients planned for upper limb surgeries as it avoids the undesired effects of the medications used in general anesthesia as well as the stress response associated with airway manipulation. Opioid agonist–antagonists such as nalbuphine are used as adjuvant to improve the anesthetic properties of bupivacaine. Verapamil has an additive effect in brachial plexus blockade in the form of decreasing the consumption of analgesics in the postoperative period with reducing onset time and extending the duration of motor and sensory blockade. The aim of this study is to investigate the adjuvant effect of verapamil versus nalbuphine to 0.5% bupivacaine in brachial plexus block as regards onset, duration of sensory and motor blockade and postoperative analgesic augmentation. The study is randomized, prospective, double-blinded, comparative study where 90 patients subjected to arm, forearm and hand surgeries were randomized into three groups, group A received 30 ml of plain bupivacaine 0.5% plus 2 ml of normal saline, group B received 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% plus 2 ml verapamil equivalent to 5 mg, group C received 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% plus 10 mg of nalbuphine diluted in 2 ml of normal saline. Results Results of this study showed that group C and group B sensory block time onset was 7.25 ± 1.5 vs. 10.92 ± 3.84 min, P < 0.001 and was shorter than that in group A (13.2 ± 2.66 min). In addition, the motor block onset was (11.10 ± 1.24 vs. 13.50 ± 3.77 min, P < 0.001) shorter than group A (17.16 ± 1.30 min). In group C and group B, sensory block duration was 396 ± 32.17 vs. 355.83 ± 18.48 min, P < 0.001, respectively and was longer than that in group A (321.13 ± 25.08 min). Also, there was prolonged motor block duration in group C and group B recording (338.92 ± 25.2 vs. 302.93 ± 15.24 min, P < 0.001) and was longer than that in group A (280.70 ± 32.35 min). Time of demand of rescue analgesia dose was significantly long in group C and group B (449.53 ± 52.45 vs. 418.13 ± 41.12 min, P < 0.001) and was longer than group A (361.31 ± 21.42 min). Both verapamil and nalbuphine have additive effect to bupivacaine improving the all anesthetic parameters of the block. Conclusion Both drugs produce favorable enhancement of time onset and effective prolongation of duration of sensory and motor blockade and extend the period of postoperative analgesia with superiority to nalbuphine over verapamil.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33
Author(s):  
Bhawana Rastogi ◽  
Ankush Arora ◽  
Kumkum Gupta ◽  
Manish Jain ◽  
Vijendra Pal Singh ◽  
...  

Background: The present study was designed to evaluate the hypothesis that midazolam as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine would safely enhance the duration of analgesia without any adverse effects when compared with levobupivacaine alone, in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Primary end points were the duration of sensory and motor block and secondary end points were sedation score and any other complications. Patients and Method: Eighty consenting patients of both sexes, aged 18-60 years of ASA physical status I-II were randomized into two groups of 40 patients each. Patients in Group LS received 19 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 1 ml normal saline and patients in Group LM received 19 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 1ml midazolam (50µg/kg) for supraclavicular brachial plexus block using ultrasound guidance. Onset time and duration of sensory and motor blockade and VAS scores were assessed as primary end points. Hemodynamic changes, sedation or any other drug or technique related adverse effects were taken as secondary effects. Results: Onset of sensory and motor blockade was lower in patients of Group LM. The mean duration of sensory analgesia was significantly prolonged in patients of Group LM (537.6 ± 101.01 vs. 319.80 ± 87.09 mins). The mean duration of motor blockade was also significantly enhanced in patients of Group LM (405.0 ± 61.62 mins) compared to Group LS (274.8 ± 46.30 mins). VAS scores were higher in Group LS than group LM. Sedation scores were similar in both the groups. Conclusion: Midazolam with 0.5% levobupivacaine has effectively enhanced the duration of sensory and motor block without significant sedation and any other side effect.


Author(s):  
Kartheek Hanumansetty ◽  
Hemalatha S. ◽  
Gurudatt C. L.

Background: The supraclavicular brachial plexus block has proven to be an important, safer and effective alternative to general anaesthesia in surgeries of upper extremity. Primary aim is to study the effect of addition of dexamethasone to levobupivacaine on postoperative analgesia and secondary objectives are to study onset, peak effect and duration of sensory and motor block in brachial plexus blockade in adult patients posted for upper limb surgeriesMethods: This prospective randomized clinical study was conducted on 60 patients of age 18 to 60 years posted for upper limb surgeries. They were randomly allocated into two groups of 30. In Control group LS (n=30) received Inj. Levobupivacaine 30ml and Inj. Normal saline 2ml. In Study group LD (n=30) received Inj. Levobupivacaine 30ml and Inj. Dexamethasone 2ml (8mg).Results: Both the groups were demographically comparable. Onset of sensory block and motor block in group LD and in group LS were similar (p>0.05). Mean duration of sensory and motor block in group LD was higher than in group LS (<0.001). Duration of postoperative analgesia was 21.20±3.23 hours in group LD and 10.24±1.57 hours in group LS (p<0.001).Conclusions: Dexamethasone added to levobupivacaine for brachial plexus block prolonged the duration of sensory, motor blockade and postoperative analgesia but did not alter the onset time, peak effect time of sensory and motor blockade.


2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31
Author(s):  
Farhanaz Zainab ◽  
Mohammad Omar Faruq ◽  
Moumita Talukder ◽  
Sabina Yeasmeen ◽  
AKM Shamsul Alam ◽  
...  

Brachial plexus block is gaining popularity day by day for upper extremity surgery because it has manifold advantages. Supraclavicular approach offers a high success rate for elbow, forearm, hand surgery. Different mixtures of local anesthetics are intended to provide faster block onset than long-acting agents and to extend the duration typically seen with intermediate or short-acting agents. This prospective, randomized comparative study was conducted to compare the onset time of sensory block, onset time of motor block and time to achieve complete block, duration of analgesia adding fentanyl with bupivacaine-lignocaine mixtures in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. A total of 60 patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for the study & devided into two groups. Group A received lignocaine-bupivacaine mixtures( 1% lignocaine, 0.25% bupivacaine) and was considered control; group Group B received fentanyl (100?g) with the local anaesthetic mixtures( 1% lignocaine, 0.25% bupivacaine). The mean onset of sensory and motor block were significantly early in group B compared with that of group A. The mean time to achieve complete block and duration of analgesia were significantly longer in group B. It was revealed in the study that patients of group B had no pain up to 4 hrs, there was first reporting of pain (VAS >4) around 5 hrs, the worst pain was experienced after 8 hrs, first dose of analgesic was administered according to patient’s request. The patients of group A had no pain up to 3 hrs. Thereafter pain intensity increased at 4 hrs, around 6 hrs postoperatively the patients experienced the worst pain . This feature reveals a significantly longer duration of analgesia in group B. This study revealed that addition of fentanyl significantly causes early onset of anaesthesia and longer duration of analgesia without any side effects.Bangladesh Med J. 2015 Jan; 44 (1): 26-31


2017 ◽  
pp. E111-E116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Recep Aksu ◽  
Cihangir Bicer

Purpose: Research is ongoing to determine the lowest dose of local anesthetics in brachial plexus block that provides adequate anesthesia and postoperative analgesia and reduces complications related to local anesthetics. Methods: Patients 18-65 years of age who underwent upper limb surgery and who received ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block at the Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine Hospital between February 2014 and January 2015 were included in the study (n=50). Supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks were performed on Group B cases by adding 30 ml 0.33% bupivacaine and on Group BD cases by adding 15 ml 0.33% bupivacaine and 1 µg / kg dexmedetomidine. Block success was evaluated by the onset and block duration of motor and sensory block and the duration of analgesia. Results: The block success of Group B and Group BD was 92.6% and 89.3%, respectively (P = 1.000). Onset time of sensory block, degree of sensory block, duration of sensory block, onset time of motor block, degree of motor block and duration of motor block were similar in both groups in the intergroup comparison (P > 0.05). Duration of analgesia and the operative conditions of groups were similar (P > 0.05). Conclusions: In the implementation of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block, block success, sensory and motor block and analgesia duration were similar for patients anaesthetized with 30 ml of bupivacaine in comparison with dexmedetomidine+bupivacaine (when the bupivacaine dose was reduced by 50% by the addition of the adjuvant).


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 543-550
Author(s):  
Abhishek R ◽  
Arun Aravind ◽  
Shankaranarayana P

:Bupivacaine is an amide local anesthetic, available as a racemic mixture of Dextro and Levorotatory Isomers. Due to its rapid onset and longer duration of anesthesia, It is routinely preferred in various regional anesthetic techniques. However, it is associated with serious cardiovascular and neurological toxicity. Its pure S- enantiomer, Levobupivacaine having similar pharmacological profile is known to have lesser cardiovascular and CNS toxicity. Combining adjuvants like clonidine, a centrally acting partial alpha-2-adrenergic agonist to improve quality of anesthesia is common practice. Hence, the aim of our study is to compare efficacy and safety of 0.25% Levobupivacaine and 0.25% Bupivacaine when combined with clonidine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries.Eighty patients aged between 18 to 60 years with ASA physical status I-II, scheduled for elective upper limb surgeries under were randomized into two groups. Peripheral nerve stimulator guided Supraclavicular brachial plexus block was administered. Group BC received 30ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine plus 1µg/kg Clonidine and Group LC 30ml of 0.25% Levobupivacaine plus 1µg/kg Clonidine. The time of onset of sensory and motor block, duration of sensory and motor block, perioperative hemodynamic parameters, postoperative pain for 24hours and adverse effects were studies.Group LC had faster onset of sensory block (p= 0.014) as well as faster onset of motor block (p= 0.012) compared to group BC. However, durations of sensory block and motor block were statistically not significant in both the groups (p&#62;0.05). Perioperative hemodynamic parameters and assessment of pain during 24 hours of post operative period were comparable and statistically not significant.1mcg/kg of clonidine used as an adjuvant to 30ml of 0.25% Levobupivacaine produces faster onset of sensory and motor block compared to 0.25% Bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. However, similar anesthetic efficacy in terms of duration of sensory and motor block, hemodynamics and postoperative analgesia were observed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1791-1793

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block by nalbuphine and compare it to ropivacaine alone. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Fatima Memorial Hospital/College of Medicine & Dentistry, Lahore from 1st June 2020 to 31st March 2021. Methods: Ninety six patients of both genders with ages 20 to 65 years undergoing upper limb surgical procedure electively were included. All the patients were divided equally in to two groups, each group consist of 48 patients. Group A treated with ropivacaine with nalbuphine and group B treated with ropivacaine normal saline. Effectiveness between both groups was examined. Results: No significant difference was observed regarding age, gender, body mass index and ASA class I/II between both groups with p-value >0.05.A significant difference was found regarding onset time of sensory and motor block between both groups (p=0.001). Mean sensory block duration in group A was more 425.18±17.82 minutes as compared to group B 254.43±20.44 minutes. Mean duration of motor block was also more in group A 418.65±20.84 minutes as compared to group B 226.15±12.52 minutes. Duration of analgesia was high in group A as compared to group B with p-value <0.05. Conclusion: In supraclavicular brachial plexus block 0.75% with 10mg of nalbuphine is particularly effective in sensory, motor, and analgesic periods in relation to ropivacaine alone. Keywords: Supraclavicular, Brachial plexus block, Ropivacaine, Nalbuphine, Duration of analagesia


Author(s):  
Shaheena Parveen ◽  
Masrat Jan ◽  
Arshi Taj ◽  
Arif A. Bhat

Background: Supraclavicular brachial plexus block is a good alternative to general anesthesia in surgeries of elbow, forearm, wrist and hand. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of dexamethasone as an adjuvant with bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block in upper limb surgeries.Methods: This study was carried out on 60 adult patients of both sexes planned for upper limb surgery during the period from May 2015 to Jan 2016 after approval by the institutional Ethical Committee. Inclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists physical Status I-II and age between 18 and 50 years. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups of 30 patients each [group I (bupivacaine alone) and group II (bupivacaine + dexamethasone)]. Group I received 30ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with 2ml normal saline while group II received 30ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with 2ml (8mg) dexamethasone for supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), version 16.0. For analysis of demographic data and comparison of groups, χ2, unpaired Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test were performed. Power of significance p-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. We evaluated onset, quality and duration of sensory and motor block along with side effects if any.Results: The mean onset of sensory and motor block in Group I and II was statistically insignificant. The duration of motor and sensory block was significantly prolonged in Group II than in Group I. There were no statistically and clinically significant differences in respiratory and hemodynamic parameters.Conclusions: We conclude that dexamethasone as an adjuvant in supraclavicular brachial plexus block prolongs the duration of motor and sensory block with insignificant side effects.


Author(s):  
Fahad Khan ◽  
V. P. Singh

Background: Comparative study of intravenous versus perineural administration of dexmedetomidine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block using 0.75% ropivacaine by ultrasound guided technique in upper limb surgeries.Methods: Patients in the age group 18-58 years both male and female, having ASA 1 and ASA 2, scheduled for elective surgery of unilateral upper limb surgeries were included and randomly divided into three groups’ i.e. group RD, group RDI and group R and patients with chronic pain or taking any analgesics, ASA grade III and IV, bleeding disorders, history of brachial plexus injury, known allergy to the study drug, previous shoulder surgery, any psychiatric disorders, peripheral neuropathy, failed block, significant respiratory disease, hearing impairment, pregnant women, study were excluded.Results: Time to sensory onset in group RD was as compared to group RDI and group R was found statistically significant (p<0.001). Duration of sensory block (analgesia) in group RD, group RDI and Group R was also statistically significant (p<0.001). The level of sedation of Group RDI and Group RD had highly significant value till 30 mins (p<0.001).Conclusions: The central effects of dexmedetomidine also play some role in prolongation of sensory and motor block duration, as explained previously.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (14) ◽  
pp. 849-853
Author(s):  
Shweta Saurin Mehta ◽  
Nidhiben Sureshbhai Patel

BACKGROUND Supraclavicular brachial plexus block is a reliable, regional anaesthetic technique for upper limb surgeries. Also known as “spinal of upper limb”.1 The present study was conducted to assess the analgesic efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to 0.5 % ropivacaine for ultrasound sonography (USG) guided brachial plexus block. METHODS 50 adult patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II of both genders, aged 18 - 50 years scheduled for elective upper limb surgeries under brachial plexus block via supraclavicular approach were randomised into 2 groups of 25 patients each to receive either 20 ml of 0.5 % ropivacaine with 2 ml of normal saline (group A) or 20 ml of 0.5 % ropivacaine with 2 ml of dexamethasone (8 mg) (group B). RESULTS Use of ultrasound helps in better visualisation of nerves, needle & spread of local anaesthetic at brachial plexus block site. So, less amount of drug volume is required for the block. Time of onset of sensory and motor block was significantly lower in group B compared to group A. Mean duration of motor and sensory block was significantly longer in group B than group A. The duration of postoperative analgesia was 18.79 ± 2.31 hours in group B & 9.06 ± 0.35 hours in group A, with statistically highly significant difference (P < 0.05). There were no perioperative haemodynamic variations between the two groups and no complication of technique or adverse effects due to dexamethasone occurred. CONCLUSIONS Dexamethasone 8 mg has significantly extended duration of analgesia of brachial plexus block with no adverse effects. KEYWORDS Brachial Plexus Block, Ropivacaine, Dexamethasone, Supraclavicular Approach, Ultrasound Guidance


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document