Placental Mosaicism in the Era of Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) Screening: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Yang Cao ◽  
Nicole L. Hoppman ◽  
Sarah E. Kerr ◽  
Christopher A. Sattler ◽  
Kristi S. Borowski ◽  
...  

Background.Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is revolutionizing prenatal screening as a result of its increased sensitivity, specificity. NIPS analyzes cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) circulating in maternal plasma to detect fetal chromosome abnormalities. However, cffDNA originates from apoptotic placental trophoblast; therefore cffDNA is not always representative of the fetus. Although the published data for NIPS testing states that the current technique ensures high sensitivity and specificity for aneuploidy detection, false positives are possible due to isolated placental mosaicism, vanishing twin or cotwin demise, and maternal chromosome abnormalities or malignancy.Results.We report a case of false negative cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening due to fetoplacental mosaicism. An infant male with negative cfDNA screening result was born with multiple congenital abnormalities. Postnatal chromosome and FISH studies on a blood specimen revealed trisomy 13 in 20/20 metaphases and 100% interphase nuclei, respectively. FISH analysis on tissues collected after delivery revealed extraembryonic mosaicism.Conclusions.Extraembryonic tissue mosaicism is likely responsible for the false negative cfDNA screening result. This case illustrates that a negative result does not rule out the possibility of a fetus affected with a trisomy, as cffDNA is derived from the placenta and therefore may not accurately represent the fetal genetic information.


2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 397-398
Author(s):  
Francesca Romana Grati ◽  
Jose Ferreira ◽  
Peter Benn ◽  
Claudia Izzi ◽  
Federica Verdi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (S1) ◽  
pp. 32-32
Author(s):  
A. Familiari ◽  
B. Ischia ◽  
V. Accurti ◽  
I. Fabietti ◽  
S. Boito ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-93
Author(s):  
Ji E. Park ◽  
Ji K. Park ◽  
Min Y. Kang ◽  
In A. Cho ◽  
Jong C. Baek

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Romana Grati ◽  
Jose Ferreira ◽  
Peter Benn ◽  
Claudia Izzi ◽  
Federica Verdi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jill Rafalko ◽  
Erica Soster ◽  
Samantha Caldwell ◽  
Eyad Almasri ◽  
Thomas Westover ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Of 86,902 prenatal genome-wide cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening tests, 4,121 were positive for a chromosome abnormality. This study examines 490 cases screen-positive for one or more subchromosomal copy-number variants (CNV) from genome-wide cfDNA screening. Methods Cases positive for one or more subchromosomal CNV from genome-wide cfDNA screening and diagnostic outcomes were compiled. Diagnostic testing trends were analyzed, positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated, and the type of chromosomal abnormalities ultimately confirmed by diagnostic testing were described. Results CNVs were identified in 0.56% of screened specimens. Of the 490 cases screen-positive for one or more CNV, diagnostic outcomes were available for 244 cases (50%). The overall PPV among the cases with diagnostic outcomes was 74.2% (95% CI: 68.1–79.5%) and 71.8% (95% CI: 65.5–77.4%) for “fetal-only” events. Overall, isolated CNVs showed a lower PPV of 61.0% (95% CI: 52.5–68.8%) compared to complex CNVs at 93.9% (95% CI: 86.6–97.5%). Isolated deletions/duplications and unbalanced structural rearrangements were the most common diagnostic outcomes when isolated and complex CNVs were identified by cfDNA screening, respectively. Conclusion Genome-wide cfDNA screening identifies chromosomal abnormalities beyond the scope of traditional cfDNA screening, and the overall PPV associated with subchromosomal CNVs in cases with diagnostic outcomes was >70%.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristy Crooks ◽  
Ginger Edwardsen ◽  
Siobhan O'Connor ◽  
Cynthia Powell ◽  
Diane Vargo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document