Comparison of three methods for driven pile capacity

Author(s):  
Anthony R. Oxley
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 103103
Author(s):  
L. D. Suits ◽  
T. C. Sheahan ◽  
J. R. M. S. Oliveira ◽  
P. R. R. L. Nunes ◽  
M. R. L. Silva ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bengt H Fellenius ◽  
Jaime A Santos ◽  
António Viana da Fonseca

The 2nd International Conference on Site Characterization (ISC'2), held in 2004, included a seminar for prediction of pile capacity involving three 6 m embedment length test piles, one 350 mm square driven concrete pile, and two 600 mm diameter, strain-gage instrumented, bored piles. Invited predictors were provided with results of in situ, laboratory tests and dynamic tests. Test layout, soil information, and pile data are presented with calculations of pile capacity and load distribution, submitted predictions, and results of the static loading tests. The CPT-calculated capacities show considerable scatter—total values ranged from 500 to 1400 kN for the driven pile and from 1000 to 1900 kN for the bored piles. The static loading test on the driven pile showed an offset limit load of 1200 kN and a plunging capacity of 1500 kN. Despite pile movements of 100 mm for 1200 kN of applied load, neither of the bored piles showed signs of having reached an ultimate resistance value. Effective stress analysis of strain measurements for the bored piles showed the data to correlate to a β coefficient of 1.0 and a toe coefficient of 16. Most submitted predictions underestimated the capacity of the driven pile and overestimated the capacities of the bored piles.Key words: pile capacity, effective stress analysis, shaft and toe resistances, β coefficient, CPTU, dynamic testing.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1349 ◽  
pp. 012120
Author(s):  
M I P Harahap ◽  
A Ibrahim ◽  
M R Abdul Majid ◽  
F N L Ling

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 2919
Author(s):  
Massamba Fall ◽  
Zhengguo Gao ◽  
Becaye Cissokho Ndiaye

A pile foundation is commonly adopted for transferring superstructure loads into the ground in weaker soil. They diminish the settlement of the infrastructure and augment the soil-bearing capacity. This paper emphases the pile-driving effect on an existing adjacent cylindrical and semi-tapered pile. Driving a three-dimensional pile into the ground is fruitfully accomplished by combining the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) adaptive mesh and element deletion methods without adopting any assumptions that would simplify the simulation. Axial forces, bending moment, and lateral displacement were studied in the neighboring already-installed pile. An investigation was made into some factors affecting the forces and bending moment, such as pile spacing and the shape of the already-installed pile (cylindrical, tapered, or semi-tapered). An important response was observed in the impact of the driven pile on the nearby existing one, the bending moment and axial forces were not negligible, and when the pile was loaded, it was recommended to consider the coupling effect. Moreover, the adjacent semi-tapered pile was subjected to less axial and lateral movement than the cylindrical one with the same length and volume for taper angles smaller than 1.0°, and vice versa for taper angles greater than 1.4°.


2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin G. Burdette ◽  
Shahram Pezeshk ◽  
J. Harold Deatherage ◽  
David W. Goodpasture
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document