scholarly journals Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in the treatment of inoperable advanced pancreatic cancer and gemcitabine-based regimen

2019 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 281-286
Author(s):  
Xufeng Guo ◽  
Daoming Zhang ◽  
Hui Ren ◽  
Yongfa Zheng ◽  
Tian Tang
2015 ◽  
pp. 1427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongchun Song ◽  
Zhiyong Yuan ◽  
Fengtong Li ◽  
Yang Dong ◽  
Hongqing Zhuang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheling Chen ◽  
Shanshan Zhang ◽  
Ning Han ◽  
Jiahong Jiang ◽  
Yunyun Xu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Tumor-specific neoantigens are considered as personalized and potential ultimate targets for cancer immunotherapy. Recently, neoantigen cancer vaccines have been designed to train the patient's immune system to specifically target and kill tumor cells. However, the safety and efficacy of neoantigen vaccines in pancreatic cancer treatment remain poorly understood. Methods: Personalized peptide neoantigen cancer vaccines were successfully designed and manufactured for pancreatic cancers with low tumor mutation burden. Seven patients with advanced pancreatic cancer refractory to standard treatments were enrolled and treated with personalized peptide neoantigen vaccine, iNeo-Vac-P01. Besides the evaluation of the safety and clinical efficacy of iNeo-Vac- P01, pre- and post-vaccination peripheral blood samples were collected to analyze the vaccine’s immunogenicity.Results: For all 7 patients, none sever vaccine-related adverse effects was witnessed. The mean progression free survival, overall survival (OS) and OS associated with vaccine treatment were 3.1, 24.1 and 8.3 months, respectively. For Patient P01, who had a 21-month OS associated with vaccine treatment, the abundance of the TCR clone remarkably increased after vaccination, indicating the potential of iNeo-Vac-P01 to specifically induce a subset of T cells to kill tumor cells. This study also demonstrated that the quantity of IFN-γ in peripheral blood might be a potential biomarker for OS.Conclusions: We believed that it was the first tentative study focused in the application of peptide-based neoantigen cancer vaccine in advanced pancreatic cancer. Promisingly, personalized peptide neoantigen vaccine might provide a new strategy to improve the limited clinical efficacy for pancreatic cancer.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03645148. Registered August 24, 2018 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03645148?term=neoantigen&cond=Pancreatic+Cancer&cntry=CN&draw=2&rank=1


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592090540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor H. F. de Jesus ◽  
Marcos P. G. Camandaroba ◽  
Vinicius F. Calsavara ◽  
Rachel P. Riechelmann

Background: There are no randomized data to guide treatment decisions for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma following first-line FOLFIRINOX. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using gemcitabine-based chemotherapy after FOLFIRINOX to assess treatment efficacy and toxicity. Methods: We included studies published between 2011 and 2018 that evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy after FOLFIRINOX in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), any grade 3/4 toxicity rate, and progression-free survival (PFS). We used the random-effects model to generate pooled estimates for proportions. Results: Sixteen studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, ORR was 10.8%, DCR was 41.1%, and any grade 3/4 toxicity rate was 28.6%. In subgroup analyses, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was associated with superior ORR (14.4 versus 8.4%; p = 0.038) and DCR (53.5 versus 30.5%; p < 0.001) compared with single-agent gemcitabine. Median PFS ranged from 1.9 to 6.4 months and numerically favored gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. Conclusions: Our study suggests gemcitabine-based chemotherapy likely outperforms best supportive care after FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer. Also, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel seems to be more active than single-agent gemcitabine (CRD42018100421).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document