Comparing Household Structure Over Time and Between Cultures

1974 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Hammel ◽  
Peter Laslett
Keyword(s):  
Social Change ◽  
Group Structure ◽  
Social Mobilization ◽  
Household Structure ◽  
Knowing How ◽  
The Family ◽  
Family And Household ◽  
Domestic Group ◽  
Historical Periods ◽  
Over Time

Because of the importance of the family and household in all societies and at all historical periods, it is essential to be able to make comparisons between varieties of domestic groups. If we wish to comment on the extent to which the household is affected by social change and especially by the process of modernization, industrialization, social mobilization, or whatever that vague but ubiquitous phenomenon is called, it must be clear what would consitute such change. This means knowing how domestic group structure differs from country to country as well as from period to period.

An Aspect of Domestic Group Structure Among Eastern Canadian Eskimo

Man ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 216 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. Dunning
Keyword(s):  
Group Structure ◽  
Domestic Group

Some effects of unequal distribution of information in a wheel group structure.

1954 ◽  
Vol 49 (4, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 554-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Gilchrist ◽  
Marvin E. Shaw ◽  
L. C. Walker
Keyword(s):  
Group Structure ◽  
Unequal Distribution

A performative network theory of attitudes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Quayle
Keyword(s):  
Attitude Change ◽  
Network Structure ◽  
Network Theory ◽  
Social Group ◽  
Group Structure ◽  
Social Identities ◽  
Bipartite Network ◽  
Identity Change ◽  
Multilayer Network ◽  
Dynamic Phenomena

In this paper I propose a network theory of attitudes where attitude agreements and disagreements forge a multilayer network structure that simultaneously binds people into groups (via attitudes) and attitudes into clusters (via people who share them). This theory proposes that people have a range of possible attitudes (like cards in a hand) but these only become meaningful when expressed (like a card played). Attitudes are expressed with sensitivity to their potential audiences and are socially performative: when we express attitudes, or respond to those expressed by others, we tell people who we are, what groups we might belong to and what to think of us. Agreement and disagreement can be modelled as a bipartite network that provides a psychological basis for perceived ingroup similarity and outgroup difference and, more abstractly, group identity. Opinion-based groups and group-related opinions are therefore co-emergent dynamic phenomena. Dynamic fixing occurs when particular attitudes become associated with specific social identities. The theory provides a framework for understanding identity ecosystems in which social group structure and attitudes are co-constituted. The theory describes how attitude change is also identity change. This has broad relevance across disciplines and applications concerned with social influence and attitude change.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document