scholarly journals Multiplanar reformations and minimum intensity projections using multi-detector row CT for assessing anomalies and disorders of the pancreaticobiliary tree

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (31) ◽  
pp. 4177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Cheol Kim
2021 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 109478
Author(s):  
Christian Booz ◽  
Thomas J. Vogl ◽  
U. Joseph Schoepf ◽  
Damiano Caruso ◽  
Maria Cristina Inserra ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 207 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Raptopoulos ◽  
P Prassopoulos ◽  
R Chuttani ◽  
M M McNicholas ◽  
J D McKee ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arghavan Salles ◽  
Matilde Nino-Murcia ◽  
R. Brooke Jeffrey

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-435
Author(s):  
Patricia C. Mancini ◽  
Richard S. Tyler ◽  
Hyung Jin Jun ◽  
Tang-Chuan Wang ◽  
Helena Ji ◽  
...  

Purpose The minimum masking level (MML) is the minimum intensity of a stimulus required to just totally mask the tinnitus. Treatments aimed at reducing the tinnitus itself should attempt to measure the magnitude of the tinnitus. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the MML. Method Sample consisted of 59 tinnitus patients who reported stable tinnitus. We obtained MML measures on two visits, separated by about 2–3 weeks. We used two noise types: speech-shaped noise and high-frequency emphasis noise. We also investigated the relationship between the MML and tinnitus loudness estimates and the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ). Results There were differences across the different noise types. The within-session standard deviation averaged across subjects varied between 1.3 and 1.8 dB. Across the two sessions, the Pearson correlation coefficients, range was r = .84. There was a weak relationship between the dB SL MML and loudness, and between the MML and the THQ. A moderate correlation ( r = .44) was found between the THQ and loudness estimates. Conclusions We conclude that the dB SL MML can be a reliable estimate of tinnitus magnitude, with expected standard deviations in trained subjects of about 1.5 dB. It appears that the dB SL MML and loudness estimates are not closely related.


Spine ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
PHILIPP LANG ◽  
HARRY K. GENANT ◽  
NEIL CHAFETZ ◽  
PETER STEIGER ◽  
JAMES M. MORRIS

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document