scholarly journals A General Correlation of Primary Implant Stability between the Non-Invasive Methods Osstell and Periotest

Author(s):  
Marwa Abdel AAL ◽  
Mahmoud El Far ◽  
Nora Mohamed Sheta ◽  
Ahmed Fayyad ◽  
Eman El Desouky ◽  
...  

Various invasive and non-invasive methods have been used for measuring primary implant stability. Periotest damping device, and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) with the Osstell device have been classified as non-invasive methods.In this clinical randomized trial, a general correlation of primary implant stability was recorded using both the Osstell and Periotest device at the day of implant installation and 3 month after healing for the submerged and non submerged   loading protocols. The gender of included patients were investigated in the correlation of the two devices.Eighty completely edentulous patients were recruited, all patients were of age ranging from 50 to 69 years old. A single implant was installed in the midline of the completely edentulous mandible to improve retention of their lower denture. After implant installation, Implant Stability was recorded using the osstel and periotest device. Patients were then randomized into two groups using sealed envelopes; Submerged (S), and Non Submerged (NS). All ISQ and PTV were recorded at the day of implant installation, and 3 month after healing for both groups.When the ISQ was correlated to the (PTV), there was a moderate negative statistically significant correlation between the two readings, correlation coefficient= -0.466, p=0.000 . There tends to be a weak negative correlation between the two devices in the male group ,while there tends to be no correlation between the two devices in the female group After 3 month healing, there was no statistically significant correlation of the readings with in both groups ;NS and S ; Correlation coefficient =-0.014, -0.430, p=0.942, 0.052 respectively.   A strong negative statistically significant correlation between the two devices for the female group for both, NS and the S group. While there was no statistically significant correlation with in the male group for both groups.The present study concluded that there is a significant negative correlation between the two devices when recording primary implant stability, while this significance is lost after 3 month of loading when recording secondary implant stability. Gender would affect the implant stability recording, this would mainly due to the difference in bone density between the male and female group.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 3427
Author(s):  
Alessandro Antonelli ◽  
Francesco Bennardo ◽  
Ylenia Brancaccio ◽  
Selene Barone ◽  
Felice Femiano ◽  
...  

The author wishes to make the following corrections to this paper [...]


Author(s):  
Juri A. Steiner ◽  
Urs A.T. Hofmann ◽  
Patrik Christen ◽  
Jean M. Favre ◽  
Stephen J. Ferguson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 594-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanja Grobecker‐Karl ◽  
Victor Palarie ◽  
Sonja Schneider ◽  
Matthias Karl

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 8084
Author(s):  
Andreas Vollmer ◽  
Babak Saravi ◽  
Gernot Lang ◽  
Nicolai Adolphs ◽  
Derek Hazard ◽  
...  

The success rate of dental implants depends on primary and secondary stability. We investigate predictive factors for future risk stratification models. We retrospectively analyze 272 patients with a total of 582 implants. Implant stability is measured with resonance frequency analysis and evaluated based on the implant stability quotient (ISQ). A linear regression model with regression coefficients (reg. coeff.) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) is applied to assess predictive factors for implant stability. Implant diameter (reg. coeff.: 3.28; 95% CI: 1.89–4.66, p < 0.001), implant length (reg. coeff.: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.26–1.08, p < 0.001), and implant localization (maxillary vs. mandibular, reg. coeff.: −7.45, 95% CI: −8.70–(−6.20), p < 0.001) are significant prognostic factors for primary implant stability. An increase in ISQ between insertion and exposure is significantly correlated with healing time (reg. coeff.: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.04–0.19). Patients with maxillary implants have lower ISQ at insertion but show a higher increase in ISQ after insertion than patients with mandibular implants. We observe positive associations between primary implant stability and implant diameter, implant length, and localization (mandibular vs. maxillary). An increase in implant stability between insertion and exposure is significantly correlated with healing time and is higher for maxillary implants. These predictive factors should be further evaluated in prospective cohort studies to develop future preoperative risk-stratification models.


2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miori Howashi ◽  
Yoshihiro Tsukiyama ◽  
Yasunori Ayukawa ◽  
Kei Isoda-Akizuki ◽  
Masafumi Kihara ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document