scholarly journals Teaching Integrated Learning and Critical Thinking Through the Lens of the COVID-19 Pandemic

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Joshua C. Jenson
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Lockley

This article uses the conceptual framework of second language willingness to communicate (L2 WTC), and in particular the contributory construct of international posture (IP; Yashima, 2002), to report on a content and language integrated learning (CLIL) course taught in the Japanese university context. The research follows up an exploratory, small-scale study with a focused qualitative investigation. Due to space restrictions the current paper reports only on the key qualitative findings and attempts to build a picture of how the theme of the course, Japanese international history, affected learners’ IP, a construct that has been shown to be key to Japanese learners of English’s L2 WTC (Yashima, 2002). It is shown that after completing the course, learners felt more connected to the wider world, and as a result IP developed in varied and meaningful ways, seemingly increasing L2 WTC and stimulating critical thinking facilities both within and without the classroom.


Author(s):  
David Strong ◽  
Brian Frank

Research and development in engineering education has been prominent at Queen’s University since the early 1990’s. Initially focused on evolving improved methods to encompass theoretical, practical, industrial, and multidisciplinary aspects into undergraduate engineering programs, the outcome of those early endeavours became what is now known as “Integrated Learning” at Queen’s. This effort also recognized the need for a new and different facility to accommodate evolving pedagogical approaches and enhanced team-based activities, and in 2005, the 6,000 m2 Integrated Learning Centre was opened. Both the Integrated Learning philosophy and the corresponding facility have been a tremendous success. With the establishment of Integrated Learning , engineering education research began to expand both in breadth and depth. Research studies and publications have included topics such as optimized assessment of both students and pedagogical activities, understanding student attitudes towards learning, evaluating engineering practitioners’ needs and expectations of engineering graduates, defining needs for outreach activities, developing and assessing measurements for graduate attributes, and using web-based classroom response systems for quality student feedback. Graduate students have been engaged in engineering education research topics for nearly a decade, with the first Master’s student with a full- fledged engineering education research topic graduating in 2006, and the first post-doctoral researcher hired in 2011. Additional graduate students have been engaged in engineering education research since, producing four more Master’s graduates to date, and two more in process. The outcomes from this research, combined with collaborative efforts across the faculty, have resulted in new and innovative pedagogy, including the Multidisciplinary Design Stream and the recently introduced Engineering Design & Professional Practice sequence. Both of these programs include a combination of proven and innovative pedagogy, and through multiple assessment techniques, themselves become the subject of ongoing research and development. Further research studies are underway. One is exploring how critical thinking develops in first year engineering, and whether the use of complex authentic engineering problems assists in developing critical thinking. Queen’s is also part of a learning outcomes consortium project with Toronto, Guelph, and University of Kansas, and three Ontario colleges, to develop procedures for assessing learning outcomes at an institutional level. In addition, Queen’s is part of a collaboration with 7 Canadian and US schools on research into sustaining change in institutions and influencing adoption of evidence-based practices. The panel presentation will provide more detail on our past, present, and future research in this field. The engineering education research community in Canada is dynamic but under-represented, and it is hoped that this session will encourage more engineering academics to venture into this field.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-158
Author(s):  
Ayu Rahma Ulufa Nuri ◽  
Sajidan Sajidan ◽  
Dwi Oetomo ◽  
Nanik Murti Prasetyanti ◽  
Parmin Parmin

The objectives of this research was to examine the implementation of Science Integrated Learning Model in improving critical thinking skills of 11 Indonesian high school student in the excretion system and immune system. This research is a Class Action Research (CAR). Subjects were eleventh-grade students in the academic year of 2017/2018 consisted of 31 students, specifically 18 male students and 13 female students. The data was collected from students and teachers. Data collection techniques were conducted by observation, interview, and documentation study. The triangulation technique was used to verify the validity of the data. The data analysis technique employed was a qualitative descriptive analysis. The research procedure used an interrelated spiral CAR model. The experiment was conducted in two cycles, each cycle consisted of planning, action implementation, observation, and reflection. The result shows that students' critical thinking skills increased from 42.78% before research, become 54.92% in the first cycle, then 78.73% in the second cycle. It can be concluded that the implementation of the Science Integrated Learning Model can improve the critical thinking skills of 11 Indonesian high school students in the excretion system and immune system.


Author(s):  
Fembriani Fembriani ◽  
Taty R. Koroh

<em>Learning of  Primary School Teacher Education (PGSD) needs to improving with' critical thinking skills. Critical thinking for student in integrated learning, the basis of this research. In this case integrated learning has a low critical thinking ability value. The research will be conducted in PGSD Nusa Cendana Univercity in 4th semester using the think pair share model. The purpose of this study to determine effectiveness of learning includ differences in critical thinking skills and increasing critical thinking skills. The results of this study 1) the ability to think critically for students after learning using the think pair share model that the significance results 0,000 &lt;0.005 that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted means that there are differences in students' critical thinking skills in the control and experimental class. 2) there is an increase in students' critical thinking skills with the acquisition of N-Gain value of 0.65 which is in the range of 0.70&gt; g&gt; 0.30 in the medium criteria.</em> <em>It can be concluded that think pair share model can improve critical thinking skills of PGSD Nusa Cendana Univercity.</em>


Author(s):  
Barbora Pavelova

As many authors agree, positive associations of Content Language Academic Learning have attracted numerous researchers, administrators, teacher educators and teachers, particularly those in the field of English as a foreign language. One of the main goals of the presented article is to offer a comparative analysis of CLIL approach at primary level in Spain and in Slovakia. The need for elaborating this issue is related to the diversity of language and the fact that CLIL has become prolific phenomenon in recent years, especially in pedagogical communication. The paper responds to different claims of the proponents of CLIL emphasizing its numerous benefits. Apart from that, the following paper provides a critical empirical examination of the positive CLIL outcomes in order to identify better its strengths in EFL. Due to distance, a sample of five Spanish teachers and five Slovak teachers at the primary level has been chosen randomly to respond to the online interview elaborating the use of CLIL in the classroom. In order to gain the results of the qualitative nature, the online interview included open-ended questions. Benefits of CLIL could be reflected in the enhanced motivation inside and outside the classroom, the need of students and teachers for critical thinking, requirement for a better concentration and in many other areas. The article presents current findings and brings the possibilities for implementing CLIL into more classrooms and enhancing pedagogical communication in foreign language classrooms.  


2000 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
pp. 610-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
LS Behar-Horenstein ◽  
TA Dolan ◽  
FJ Courts ◽  
GS Mitchell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document